Advertisement

Evaluating Anchored Discussion to Foster Creativity in Online Collaboration

  • Georg J.P. Link
  • Dominik Siemon
  • Gert-Jan de Vreede
  • Susanne Robra-Bissantz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9334)

Abstract

Open innovation and crowdsourcing ideas rely on people to be creative through an online collaboration system. Creativity in online groups depends heavily on the interaction between group members. Anchored discussion was evaluated in a preliminary laboratory experiment as a new mode for creative interaction. In anchored discussion every comment is tied to some aspect of the idea. This first exploration generated novel insights for additional and refined research. Results indicate that anchored discussion leads to a more structured discussion amongst group members. For the same level of creativity, groups using anchored discussion needed less interaction and less discussion than the control groups. In a post session survey, participants made several suggestions on how to improve anchored discussion. We conclude that anchored discussion is promising as a new tool to aid online groups in creative collaboration.

Keywords

Anchored discussion Idea generation Ideation Creativity Online collaboration Creativity support systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for the first author’s contributions was provided through a scholarship from the Hanns-Seidel-Foundation as part of its efforts to support highly talented students with financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Funding for the third author’s contribution to this research was provided by the National Science Foundation Grant #1322285.

References

  1. 1.
    Alrushiedat, N., Olfman, L.: Anchored asynchronous online discussions: facilitating participation and engagement in a blended environment. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amabile, T.M.: Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43(5), 997–1013 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amabile, T.M.: The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blohm, I., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M., and Krcmar, H.: Does collaboration among participants lead to better ideas in IT-based idea competitions? an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Converence on System Science (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs, R.O., Reinig, B.A.: Bounded ideation theory: a new model of the relationship between idea-quantity and idea-quality during Ideation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R.L., Schneider, S.K.: On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Res. 24(4), 490–503 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooke, N.J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Stout, R.J.: Measuring team knowledge. Hum. Factors 42(1), 151–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dean, D.L., Hender, J.M., Rodgers, T.L., Santanen, E.L.: Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7(10), 646–699 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Connolly, T., Wynne, B.E.: Process structuring in electronic brainstorming. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(2), 268–277 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Carte, T.A., Garfield, M.J., Haley, B.J., Aronson, J.E.: Research report: the effectiveness of multiple dialogues in electronic brainstorming. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(2), 203–211 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S.: Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. J. Appl. Psychol. 78(4), 531–537 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53(3), 497–509 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: tracking down the blocking effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61(3), 392–403 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 7–149 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., Nunamaker, J.F.: Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Manag. J. 35(2), 350–369 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hrastinski, S., Kviselius, N. Z., Ozan, H., Edenius, M.: A review of technologies for open innovation: characteristics and future trends. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imine, A., Rusinowitch, M., Oster, G., Molli, P.: Formal design and verification of operational transformation algorithms for copies convergence. Theor. Comput. Sci. 351(2), 167–183 (2006)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Javadi, E., Mahoney, J., Gebauer, J.: The impact of user interface design on idea integration in electronic brainstorming: an attention-based view. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 1–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson, T.E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O’Connor, D.L., Khalil, M.K., Huang, X.: Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 10(4), 437–454 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim, K.H.: Can we trust creativity tests? a review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creat. Res. J. 18(1), 3–14 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knoll, S.W., Horton, G.: Changing the Perspective: Improving Generate thinklets for ideation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lim, B.-C., Klein, K.J.: Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J. Organ. Behav. 27(4), 403–418 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mumford, M.D., Medeiros, K.E., Partlow, P.J.: Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. J. Creat. Behav. 46(1), 30–47 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W.: How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10(3), 186–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Osch, W., Avital, M.: Collective generativity: the emergence of IT-induced mass innovation. In: All Sprouts Content (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., Simons, P.R.-J.: The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 1(3), 339–357 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C.: Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73(5), 120–134 (1995)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reinig, B.A., Briggs, R.O.: Measuring the quality of ideation technology and techniques. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reinig, B.A., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: On the measurement of ideation quality. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23(4), 143–161 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rhodes, M.: An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42(7), 305–310 (1961)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Santanen, E.L., Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.-J.: Causal relationships in creative problem solving: comparing facilitation interventions for ideation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 167–198 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Santanen, E.L., Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.-J.: The cognitive network model of creativity: a new causal model of creativity and a new brainstorming technique. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2000)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Satzinger, J.W., Garfield, M.J., Nagasundaram, M.: The creative process: the effects of group memory on individual idea generation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 143–160 (1999)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sawyer, R.K., DeZutter, S.: Distributed creativity: how collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychol. Aesthetics Creat. Arts 3(2), 81–92 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Siemon, D., Robra-Bissantz, S.: Integration of information retrieval in creativity support: a prototype to support divergent thinking. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 388–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sonnenburg, S.: Kooperative Kreativität: Theoretische Basisentwürfe und organisationale Erfolgsfaktoren, 1st edn. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden (2007) Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sun, D., Xia, S., Sun, C., Chen, D.: Operational transformation for collaborative word processing. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 6, pp. 437–446. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business. Doubleday, New York (2004) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Voigt, M., Bergener, K.: Enhancing creativity in groups - proposition of an integrated framework for designing group creativity support systems. In: Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    De Vreede, T., Boughzala, I., de Vreede, G.-J., Reiter-Palmon, R.: A model and exploratory field study on team creativity. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu, L., Nickerson, J.V.: Generating creative ideas through crowds: an experimental study of combination. In: Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg J.P. Link
    • 1
  • Dominik Siemon
    • 1
  • Gert-Jan de Vreede
    • 2
  • Susanne Robra-Bissantz
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.University of Nebraska at OmahaOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations