Advertisement

Estimating Visual Comfort in Stereoscopic Displays Using Electroencephalography: A Proof-of-Concept

  • Jérémy Frey
  • Aurélien Appriou
  • Fabien Lotte
  • Martin Hachet
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9299)

Abstract

With stereoscopic displays, a too strong depth sensation could impede visual comfort and result in fatigue or pain. We used Electroencephalography (EEG), which records brain activity, to develop a novel brain-computer interface that monitors users’ states in order to reduce visual strain. We present the first proof-of-concept system that discriminates comfortable conditions from uncomfortable ones during stereoscopic vision using EEG. It reacts within 1 s to depth variations, achieving 63 % accuracy on average and 74 % when 7 consecutive variations are measured. This study could lead to adaptive systems that automatically suit stereoscopic displays to users and viewing conditions.

Keywords

Stereoscopy Comfort EEG Adaptive system Evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Bang, J.W., Heo, H., Choi, J.-S., Park, K.R.: Assessment of eye fatigue caused by 3D displays based on multimodal measurements. Sensors 14, 16467–16485 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blankertz, B., Lemm, S., Treder, M., Haufe, S., Müller, K.-R.: Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components–a tutorial. NeuroImage 56, 814–825 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho, H., Kang, M.-K., Yoon, K.-J., Jun, S.C.: Feasibility study for visual discomfort assessment on stereo images using EEG. In: IC3D 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodgson, N.A.: Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance. In: SPIE 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drossis, G., Grammenos, D., Adami, I., Stephanidis, C.: 3D visualization and multimodal interaction with temporal information using timelines. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8119, pp. 214–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frey, J., Mühl, C., Lotte, F., Hachet, M.: Review of the use of electroencephalography as an evaluation method for human-computer interaction. In: PhyCS 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frey, J., Pommereau, L., Lotte, F., Hachet, M.: Assessing the zone of comfort in stereoscopic displays using EEG. In: CHI EA 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghaderi, F., Kim, S.K., Kirchner, E.A.: Effects of eye artifact removal methods on single trial P300 detection, a comparative study. J Neurosci Meth. 221C, 41–47 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffmann, U., Vesin, J., Ebrahimi, T.: Spatial filters for the classification of event-related potentials. In: ESANN 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lambooij, M.: IJsselsteijn, W., Fortuin, M., Heynderickx, I.: Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 53, 030201 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, H.-C.O., Seo, J., Kham, K., Lee, S.: Measurement of 3D visual fatigue using event-related potential (ERP): 3D oddball paradigm. In: 3DTV-CON 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mikkola, M., Boev, A., Gotchev, A.: Relative importance of depth cues on portable autostereoscopic display. In: MoViD 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Momeni-Moghadam, H., Kundart, J., Ehsani, M., Gholami, K.: Stereopsis with TNO and titmus tests in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students. J. Behav. Optom. 23(2), 35–39 (2012). http://www.oepf.org/journal/pdf/jbo-volume-23-issue-2-stereopsis-tno-and-titmus-testssymptomatic-and-asymptomatic-unive
  14. 14.
    Müller-Putz, G., Scherer, R., Brunner, C., Leeb, R., Pfurtscheller, G.: Better than random? a closer look on BCI results. Int. J Bioelectromagnetism 10, 52–55 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D.M., Banks, M.S.: The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. J Vis. 11, 1–29 (2011). doi: 10.1167/11.8.11
  16. 16.
    Vi, C., Subramanian, S.: Detecting error-related negativity for interaction design. In: CHI 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zander, T.O., Kothe, C.: Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general. J. Neural. Eng. 8(2), 025005 (2011). doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérémy Frey
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aurélien Appriou
    • 1
  • Fabien Lotte
    • 1
  • Martin Hachet
    • 1
  1. 1.Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest/LaBRIBordeauxFrance
  2. 2.University BordeauxBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations