Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 531-549 | Cite as

Bilingual Reading Experiences: What They Could Be and How to Design for Them

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9296)

Abstract

We introduce the idea of bilingual reading, where a document comes in two languages and the reader can choose at will on which language to focus during the reading. Between the complete ignorance of a language (where translation is the only option) and bilingualism (where translation is useless), there exists a variety of contexts of partial bilingualism where bilingual reading interfaces would prove highly useful. We first study through interviews and reviews how the bilingual reading experience is understood today. We provide an analysis framework and highlight design challenges for the design of bilingual reading appliances. We then describe a taxonomy of the different approaches available to address these challenges, analyze them in the light of our framework and show how they can be derived to sketch future bilingual reading interfaces.

Keywords

Bilingual reading Mechanisms of reading Nexus of attention E-book E-reader Parallel text Text morphing Text animation 

References

  1. 1.
    Appert, C., Fekete, J.D.: OrthoZoom scroller: 1D multi-scale navigation. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006. pp. 21–30. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bederson, B.B.: Interfaces for staying in the flow. In: Ubiquity 2004, September 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bederson, B.B., Quinn, A., Druin, A.: Designing the reading experience for scanned multi-lingual picture books on mobile phones. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2009, pp. 305–308. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braganza, C., Marriott, K., Moulder, P., Wybrow, M., Dwyer, T.: Scrolling behaviour with single- and multi-column layout. In: Proceedings of WWW 2009, pp. 831–840. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bucher, P., Chatty, S.: Qu’est-ce qu’une surface d’affichage?: une analyse rétrospective. In: Proceedings of IHM 2009, pp. 3–12. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buscher, G., Biedert, R., Heinesch, D., Dengel, A.: Eye tracking analysis of preferred reading regions on the screen. In: CHI EA 2010, pp. 3307–3312. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, B.W., Mackinlay, J.D., Zellweger, P.T., Igarashi, T.: A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. In: Proceedings of UIST 1998, pp. 123–132. ACM, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chevalier, F., Dragicevic, P., Bezerianos, A., Fekete, J.D.: Using text animated transitions to support navigation in document histories. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp. 683–692. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, C., Rumbold, K.: Reading for pleasure: a research overview. National Literacy Trust (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., Bederson, B.B.: A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Comp. Surv. 41(1), 2:1–2:31 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dehaene, S.: Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read. Penguin Group, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dragicevic, P., Huot, S., Chevalier, F.: Gliimpse: animating from markup code to rendered documents and vice versa. In: Proceedings of UIST 2011, pp. 257–262. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elmqvist, N., Henry, N., Riche, Y., Fekete, J.D.: Melange: space folding for multi-focus interaction. In: Proceedings of CHI 2008, pp. 1333–1342. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furnas, G.W.: A fisheye follow-up: Further reflections on focus + context. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, pp. 999–1008. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furnas, G.W., Bederson, B.B.: Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. In: Proceedings of CHI 1995, pp. 234–241. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao, G., Wang, H.C., Cosley, D., Fussell, S.R.: Same translation but different experience: the effects of highlighting on machine-translated conversations. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 449–458. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guilmaine, D., Viau, C., McGuffin, M.J.: Hierarchically animated transitions in visualizations of tree structures. In: Proceedings of AVI 2012, pp. 514–521. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han, C.H., Yang, C.L., Wang, H.C.: Supporting second language reading with picture note-taking. In: CHI EA 2014, pp. 2245–2250. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hinckley, K., Dixon, M., Sarin, R., Guimbretiere, F., Balakrishnan, R.: Codex: a dualscreen tablet computer. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, pp. 1933–1942. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E.: Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents. ACM ToCHI 10(2), 119–149 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyrskykari, A., Majaranta, P., jouko Räihä, K.: Proactive response to eye movements. In: Proceedings of INTERACT 2003, pp. 129–136. IOS Press (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ishak, E.W., Feiner, S.K.: Content-aware scrolling. In: Proceedings of UIST 2006, pp. 155–158. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jakobsen, M.R., Hornæk, K.: Transient visualizations. In: Proceedings of OZCHI 2007, pp. 69–76. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marshall, C.C., Bly, S.: Turning the page on navigation. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2005, pp. 225–234. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morineau, T., Blanche, C., Tobin, L., Guéguen, N.: The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 62(3), 329–348 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nelson, T.H.: Xanalogical structure, needed now more than ever: parallel documents, deep links to content, deep versioning, and deep re-use. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(4es) (1999). Article No 33Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Hara, K.: Towards a typology of reading goals. Technical report, Xerox RXRC (1996). http://www.xrce.xerox.com/content/download/16322/117657/file/EPC-1996-107.pdf
  28. 28.
    O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., Bentley, R.: Supporting memory for spatial location while reading from small displays. In: CHI EA 1999, pp. 220–221. ACM, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Piolat, A., Roussey, J.Y., Thunin, O.: Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 47(4), 565–589 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Potter, M.C.: Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In: Kieras, D.E., Just, M.A. (eds.) New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research, pp. 91–118. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1984)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rainie, L., Zickuhr, K., Purcell, K., Madden, M., Brenner, J.: The rise of e-reading, April 2012. http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading/
  32. 32.
    Schilit, B.N., Golovchinsky, G., Price, M.N.: Beyond paper: Supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. In: Proceedings of CHI 1998, pp. 249–256. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1998)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schilit, B., Price, M., Golovchinsky, G., Tanaka, K., Marshall, C.: The reading appliance revolution. Computer 32(1), 65–73 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schlienger, C., Dragicevic, P., Ollagnon, C., Chatty, S.: Les transitions visuelles différenciées : principes et applications. In: Proceedings of IHM 2006, pp. 59–66. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shibata, H., Omura, K.: Effects of paper on page turning: comparison of paper and electronic media in reading documents with endnotes. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engin. Psychol. and Cog. Ergonomics, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6781, pp. 92–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Subbaram, V.M.: Effect of display and text parameters on reading performance. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tashman, C.S., Edwards, W.K.: Active reading and its discontents: The situations, problems and ideas of readers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 2927–2936. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tiedemann, J.: Bitext alignment. In: Hirst, G. (ed.) Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 14. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tucker, G.R.: A global perspective on bilingualism and bilingual education. In: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1999, p. 332 (2001)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wästlund, E., Norlander, T., Archer, T.: The effect of page layout on mental workload: a dual-task experiment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(3), 1229–1245 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yu, C.H., Miller, R.C.: Enhancing web page readability for non-native readers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, pp. 2523–2532. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zellweger, P.T., Regli, S.H., Mackinlay, J.D., Chang, B.W.: The impact of fluid documents on reading and browsing: an observational study. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000, pp. 249–256. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, CÉDRICParisFrance

Personalised recommendations