Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 165-182 | Cite as

Design Criteria for Stimulating Emotions in Web Applications

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9296)

Abstract

This work aims to identify the main aspects of Web design responsible for eliciting specific emotions. For this purpose, we performed a user study with 40 participants testing a Web application designed by applying a set of criteria for stimulating various emotions. In particular, we considered six emotions (hate, anxiety, boredom, fun, serenity, love), and for each of them a specific set of design criteria was exploited. The purpose of the study was to reach a better understanding regarding what design techniques are most important to stimulate each emotion. We report on the results obtained and discuss their implications. Such results can inform the development of guidelines for Web applications able to stimulate users’ emotions.

Keywords

Web guidelines Emotions Affective interfaces Adaptable interfaces 

References

  1. 1.
    Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and i: understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., Wright, P. (eds.) Funology. Human Computer Interaction Series, vol. 3, pp. 31–42. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karlsson, M.: Expressions, emotions, and web site design. CoDesign 3(1), 75–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, J., Lee, J., Choi, D.: Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. Int. J. Hum Comput. Stud. 56(6), 899–940 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., De Angeli, A.: Investigating attractiveness in web user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., Noonan, P.: An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 1 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, X., Chakraborty, I., Lin, J., Rauschenberger, R.: Correlating low-level image statistics with users’ rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages. In: Proceedings of the CHI (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Angeli, A., Sutcliffe, A., Hartmann, J.: Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users’ preferences? In: Proceedings of the DIS 2006, pp. 271–280, ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cyr, D.: Emotion and web site design. In: Soegaard, M., Dam, R.F. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, 2nd edn., (Chapter 40), Interaction Design Foundation. http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/emotion_and_website_design.html
  9. 9.
    Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., Brown, J.: Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 115–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., Sharfi, T.: Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 1071–1083 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tuch, A.N., Presslaber, E., Stoecklin, M., Opwis, K., Bargas-Avila, J.: The Role of visual complexity and prototypically regarding first impression of web sites: working towards understanding aesthetic judgments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70(11), 794–811 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mori, G., Paternó, F., Furci, F.: Design criteria for web applications adapted to emotions. In: Casteleyn, S., Rossi, G., Winckler, M. (eds.) ICWE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8541, pp. 400–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Constants across cultures in the face and emotions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17(2), 124–129 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bànziger, T., Tran, V., Scherer, K.R.: The Geneva emotion wheel. J. Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 23–34 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cowie R., Douglas-Cowie E., Savvidou S, McMahon E.: ‘FEELTRACE’: an instrument for recording perceived emotion in real time. In: Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on Speech and Emotion pp. 19–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reinecke K., Yeh T., Miratrix L., Mardiko R., Zhao Y., Liu J., Gajos K. Z.: Predicting users’ first impressions of web site aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 2049–2058 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H.: Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: a multi-method evaluation. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68(1–2), 1–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonnardel, N., Piolat, A., Le Bigot, L.: The impact of colour on website appeal and users’ cognitive processes. Disp. J. 32(2), 69–80 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ou, L.C., Luo, M.R., Woodcock, A., Wright, A.: A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: colour emotions for single colours. Color Res. Appl. 29(3), 232–240 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISTI – CNRPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations