Advertisement

Transport Disadvantage, Car Dependence and Urban Form

  • Giulio Mattioli
  • Matteo Colleoni
Chapter
Part of the Research for Development book series (REDE)

Abstract

In a more mobile world, the ability to cover greater distances and access to motorised means of transport are increasingly important for access to services and opportunities and, as a result, for social status and inclusion. In this chapter, we put forward an integrated conceptualisation of transport disadvantage, based on an extensive literature review and on insights from our own research. Given the dominance and the structuring power of car-based mobility in developed societies, we sketch a typology of different forms of car-related transport disadvantage, which allows us to show how access problems vary considerably in relation to car ownership and use. Given the important relationships between transport disadvantage, urban structure and the built environment, we then illustrate the spatial dimension of all forms of car-related transport disadvantage and demonstrate the role of urban socio-spatial configurations (i.e. patterns in the distribution of different social groups within metropolitan areas) in compounding or alleviating these issues. In the concluding section, we briefly review the policy options to tackle transport disadvantage, providing concrete examples of the measures proposed and implemented in a number countries.

Keywords

Transport disadvantage Social exclusion Car dependence Urban form Accessibility Transport policy 

References

  1. Allemand, S. (2008). Apprendre la mobilité. Les ateliers mobilité: une expérience originale. Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu.Google Scholar
  2. BBSR. (2009). Chancen und Risiken steigender Verkehrskosten für die Stadt- und Siedlungsentwicklung unter Beachtung der Aspekte der postfossilen Mobilität. BBSR-Online-Publikation 06/2009.Google Scholar
  3. Blumenberg, E., & Manville, M. (2004). Beyond the spatial mismatch: Welfare recipients and transport policy. Journal of Planning Literature, 19, 182–205. doi: 10.1177/0885412204269103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boden, D., & Molotch, H. (1994). The compulsion to proximity. In R. Friedland & D. Boden (Eds.), Nowhere. Space, time and modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cass, N., Shove, E., & Urry, J. (2005). Social exclusion, mobility and access. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 539–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatman, D., & Voorhoeve, N. (2010). The transportation-credit mortgage: A post-mortem. Housing Policy Debate, 20(3), 355–382. doi: 10.1080/10511481003788786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colleoni, M. (2013). Mobility, accessibility and social equity: A comparative and interdisciplinary empirical study in the metropolitan areas of Milan, Bologna and Turin. In D. Henckel, S. Thomaier, B. Könecke, R. Zedda, & S. Stabilini (Eds.), Space-time design of the public city (pp. 137–156). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curl, A., Nelson, J. D., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Currie, G. (Ed.). (2011). New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research. Emerald: Bingley.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2010). Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage. Transportation, 37(6), 953–966. doi: 10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2011). Mobility vs. affordability as motivations for car-ownership choice in urban fringe, low-income Australia. In K. Lucas, E. Blumenberg, & R. Weinberger (Eds.), Auto motives. Understanding car use behaviours (pp. 193–208). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  12. Dargay, J. M. (2002). Determinants of car ownership in rural and urban areas: A pseudo-panel analysis. Transportation Research Part E, 38, 351–366. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00019-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2007). Oil vulnerability in the Australian city: Assessing socioeconomic risks from higher urban fuel prices. Urban Studies, 44(1), 37–62. doi: 10.1080/00420980601023810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2014). EU Transport in figures. Statistical pocketbook 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  15. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farber, S., & Páez, A. (2009). My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(3), 216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farber, S., & Páez, A. (2011). Running to stay in place: The time-use implications of automobile oriented land-use and travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 782–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fol, S., Dupuy, G., & Coutard, O. (2007). Transport policy and the car divide in the UK, the US and France: Beyond the environmental debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 802–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallez, C., & Kaufmann, V. (Eds.). (2010). Mythes et pratiques de la coordination urbanisme-transport. Regards croisés sur quatres agglomérations suisses et françaises. INRETS.Google Scholar
  20. Gleeson, B., & Randolph, B. (2002). Social disadvantage and planning in the Sidney context. Urban Policy and Research, 20, 101–107. doi: 10.1080/08111140220131636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hine, J., & Grieco, M. (2003). Scatters and clusters in time and space: Implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport. Transport Policy, 10, 299–306. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00055-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jouffe, Y., Massot, & M. H. (2013). Vulnérabilités sociales dans la transition énergétique au croisement de l’habitat et de la mobilité quotidienne. 1er Congrès Interdisciplinaire du Development Durable. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00852513. Accessed in July 17, 2015.
  23. Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745–756. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenyon, S., Lyons, G., & Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3), 207–219. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kesteloot, C. (2005). Urban socio-spatial configurations and the future of European cities. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Cities of Europe. Changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to urban cohesion (pp. 123–148). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Knowles, R. D. (2006). Transport shaping space: Differential collapse in time-space. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(6), 407–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Breton, E. (2004a). Exclusion et immobilité: la figure de l’insulaire. In J.-P. Orfeuil (Ed.), Transports, pauvretés, exclusions. Pouvoir bouger pour s’en sortir. Paris: Editions de l’aube.Google Scholar
  28. Le Breton, E. (2004b). Nouveaux problèmes de mobilité, nouveaux acteurs? L’aide à la mobilité dans le secteur de l’insertion sociale et professionelle. In J. P. Orfeuil (Ed.), Transports, pauvretés, exclusions. Paris: Pouvoir bouger pour s’en sortir. Editions de l’aube.Google Scholar
  29. Levitas, R. (2006). The concept and measurement of social exclusion. In C. Pantazis, C. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Litman, T. (2015). Affordable-accessible housing in a dynamic city. Why and how to increase affordable housing in accessible neighborhoods. Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Victoria.Google Scholar
  31. Lovelace, R., & Philips, I. (2014). The ‘oil vulnerability’ of commuter patterns: A case study from Yorkshire and the Humber, UK. Geoforu, 51, 169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas, K. (Ed.) (2004). Running on empty. Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas, K., & Jones, P. (2012). Social impacts and equity issues in transport: An introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas, K., & Markovich, J. (2011). International perspectives. In G. Currie (Ed.), New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research (pp. 223–239). Emerald: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucas, K., Tyler, S., & Christodoulou, G. (2008). The value of new transport in deprived areas. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Martens, K. (2006). Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkley Planning Journal, 19(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7.Google Scholar
  38. Mattioli, G. (2013a). Car dependence, sustainability and the transport policy stalemate: The potential trade-offs between intra- and inter-generational equity. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practic, 8(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mattioli, G. (2013b). Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet. Households without cars and car dependence in Germany and Great Britain (PhD thesis). Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca.Google Scholar
  40. Mattioli, G. (2014a). Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet: Households without cars and car dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 379–400. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattioli, G. (2014b). ‘How the transport system ought to be’: Revisiting transport & social exclusion research in light of energy justice concerns. Paper presented at the RGS Annual Conference 2014, London, August 26–29, 2014.Google Scholar
  42. Mattioli, G. (2015). Energy-related economic stress at the interface between transport, housing and fuel poverty: A multinational study. 2nd International Days of Sociology of Energy, 254–257. Available at http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/87866/. Accessed in September 8, 2015.
  43. Mattioli, G., Anable, J., Vrotsou, K. (forthcoming). Car dependent practices: Findings from a sequence pattern mining study of UK time use data. Transportation Research Part A.Google Scholar
  44. Motte-Baumvol, B., Massot, M. H., & Byrd, A. M. (2010). Escaping car dependence in the outer suburbs of Paris. Urban studies, 47(3), 604–619. doi: 10.1177/0042098009349773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mullen, C., Tight, M., Whiteing, A., & Jopson, A. (2014). Knowing their place on the roads: What would equality mean for walking and cycling? Transportation Research Part A, 61, 238–248. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.009.Google Scholar
  46. Münter, A. (2013). Informations- und Wahrnehmungslücken von Stadt-Umland-Wanderern bei der Wohnstandortwahl. In j. Scheiner, H. H. Blotevogel, S. Frank, C. Holz-Rau, & N. Schuster (Eds.), Mobilitäten und Immobilitäten. Menschen – Ideen – Dinge – Kulturen – Kapital (pp. 263–275). Essen: Klartext.Google Scholar
  47. Næss, P. (2006). Urban structure matters. Residential location, car dependence and travel behaviour. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nicolas, J. P., Vanco, F., & Verry, D. (2012). Mobilité quotidienne et vulnerabilité des menages. Revue d’Economie Regionale & Urbaine, 1, 19–44. doi: 10.3917/reru.121.0019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paaswell, R. E., & Recker, W. W. (1976). Problems of the carless. Report prepared for the U.S.. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  51. Polacchini, A., & Orfeuil, J. P. (1999). Les dépenses des ménages franciliens pour le logement et les transports. Recherche Transports Sécurité, 63, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rendall, S., Page, S., & Krumdieck, S. (2014). Voila! A new measure of oil vulnerability for cities. Paper presented at the 1st International e-Conference on Energies, March 14–31, 2014.Google Scholar
  53. SEU. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  54. Sexton, S., Wu, J., & David, Z. (2012). How high gas prices triggered the housing crisis: Theory and empirical evidence. University of California, Center for Energy and Environmental Economics Working Paper Series. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  55. Siedentop, S., Roos, S., & Fina, S. (2013). Ist die „Autoabhängigkeit“ von Bewohnern städtischer und ländlicher Siedlungsgebiete messbar? Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Indikatorenkonzepts in der Region Stuttgart. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 71, 329–341. doi: 10.1007/s13147-013-0240-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, N., Hirsch, D., & Davis, A. (2012). Accessibility and capability: The minimum transport needs and costs of rural households. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stanley, J., & Stanley, J. (2007). Public transport and social exclusion: An operator’s perspective. In G. Currie, J. Stanley, & J. Stanley (Eds.), No way to go. Transport and social disadvantage in Australian communities (pp. 14.1–14.11). Clayton: Monash University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stanley, J., Stanley, J., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Currie, G. (2010). The place of transport in facilitating social inclusion via the mediating influence of social capital. Research in Transportation Economics, 29, 280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2004). Inconspicuous consumption. Work-rich, time-poor in the liberal market economy. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(1), 79–100. doi: 10.1177/1469540504040905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, J., Barnard, M., Neil, H., & Creegan, C. (2009). The travel choices and needs of low income households: The role of the car. The National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, B. D., & Ong, P. D. (1995). Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of rase, residence and commuting in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 32(9), 1453–1473. doi: 10.1080/00420989550012348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Unbehaun, W., & Uhlmann, T. (2013). Chancengerechtigkeit im Mobilitätsalltag - eine messbare Größe? In J. Scheiner, H. H. Blotevogel, S. Frank, C. Holz-Rau, & N. Schuster (Eds.), Mobilitäten und Immobilitäten: Menschen - Ideen - Dinge - Kulturen – Kapita (pp. 181–194). Essen: Klartext.Google Scholar
  63. Urry, J. (2002). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255–274. doi: 10.1177/0038038502036002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39. doi: 10.1177/0263276404046059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Velaga, N. R., Beecroft, M., Nelson, J. D., Corsar, D., & Edwards, P. (2012). Transport poverty meets the digital divide: Accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 102–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Walker, J. (2008). Purpose-driven public transport: Creating a clear conversation about public transport goals. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(6), 436–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.University of Milan BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations