Advertisement

Identification in E-Participation: Between Quality of Identification Data and Participation Threshold

  • Peter Parycek
  • Judith Schossböck
  • Bettina RinnerbauerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9249)

Abstract

E-participation projects have to consider a low participation threshold while maintaining security and data quality standards. While users often perceive complex regulations and logins as hurdles for participation, providers of solutions want to avoid misuse and in some cases have identified the participants uniquely. Not all levels of e-participation require the same quality of identification and authentication to produce reliable outcomes. Based on the first results of an Austrian e-participation project, the paper presents a model that tries to match these complex relations and examines which identification methods are seen as appropriate on which levels of e-participation based on the dimensions of quality of identification data and low participation threshold.

Keywords

E-participation Identification Authentication Data quality 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The project “E-Partizipation” (“E-Participation”) is funded by the Austrian security research programme KIRAS of the Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit). We would like to thank our project partners: the Austrian Institute of Technology, the Austrian State Printing House, the Centre for Computers and Law (University of Vienna), the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Rubicon.

References

  1. 1.
    Fraser, C., et. al: DEMO_net: Demo_net Deliverable 5.1: Report on current ICTs to enable participation (2006). http://www.academia.edu/2737661/DEMO_net_Deliverable_5.1_Report_on_current_ICTs_to_enable_Participation. Accessed 15 March 2015
  2. 2.
    Phang, D., Kankanhalli, A.: A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Mag. Commun. ACM 51(12), 128–132. New York (2008) based on Glass, J.J.: Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques. Am. Plan. Assoc. J. 45, 180–189 (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Dalou, R., Abu-Shanab, E.: E-Participation levels and technologies. In: Proceedings of the ICIT 2013 The 6th International Conference on Information Technology (2013), 8 May 2013. http://sce.zuj.edu.jo/icit13/images/Camera%20Ready/E-Technology/656.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  4. 4.
    Machintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: The Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37) (2004), 5–8 Jan 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, N.: An overview of e-participation models. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2006). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan023622.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  6. 6.
    Medimorec, D., Parycek, P., Schossböck, J.: Vitalizing democracy through e-participation and open government: An Austrian and Eastern European perspective (2010). Bertelsmann Verlag. http://www.fundacionbertelsmann.org/cps/rde/xbcr/SID-853E53E9-9B1F1F76/bst/Daniel%20Medimorec.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  7. 7.
    Ergazakis, K. Metaxiotis, K, Tsitsanis, T.: A state-of-the-art review of applied forms and areas, tools and technologies for e-participation. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 7(1) (January–March 2011). www.researchgate.net/profile/Teta_Stamati/publication/220526926_Electronic_Transformation_of_Local_Government_An_Exploratory_Study/links/53f463ae0cf2888a7490eae3.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  8. 8.
    Wimmer, M.A., Grimm, R., Jahn, N., Hampe, J.: Mobile participation: exploring mobile tools in e-participation. In: Wimmer, M.A., Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A. (eds.) ePart 2013. LNCS, vol. 8075, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, S., Lee, J.: E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Adm. Rev. 72(6), 819–828 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Parycek, P.: Positionspapier zu E-Democray und E-Participation in Österreich. AG EDEM, Wien (2008). http://www.ref.gv.at/uploads/media/EDEM-1-0-0-20080525.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  12. 12.
    Böszörmenyi, J, Hötzendorfer, W, Rinnerbauer, B.: Identitätsmanagement bei demokratischer Online-Beteiligung. In: Schweighofer/Kummer/Hötzendorfer, Tagungsband des 18. Internationalen Rechtsinformatik Symposions, IRIS 2015: S. 361, Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Wien (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atteslander, P.: Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 12th edn. Schmidt Verlag, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gläser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagiller, J.: Das deliberative Potenzial von Online-Diskussionen auf Nachrichtenportalen; In: Dander, V., Gründhammer, V., Ortner, H., Pfurtscheller, D., Rizzolli, M. (Hg.) Medienräume: Materialität und Regionalität, Innsbruck University Press (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bernstein, M.S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., Vargas, G.G.: 4chan and/b: an analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stranach, K., Rössler, T.: Bürgerkarte und Handy-Signatur in der Privatwirtschaft. In: eGovernment review no. 15, Jan 2015, pp. 20–21 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ringler, P., Parycek, P., Schossböck, J., Sturmberger, W., Schönherr, D., Oberhuber, F.l., Aichberger, I., Hacker, E.: Internet und Demokratie in Österreich. Grundlagenstudie. SORA (Institute for Social Research and Consulting), Wien (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stein, R., Wenda, G.: Reviewing the regulation: the future of European citizens‘ initiatives. In Proceedings of ceeeGovDays 2015 (in print; 2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stein, R., Wenda, G.: Implementing the ECI: challenges for the member states. In: Proceedings of EDEM 2011 (2011), p. 45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Müller-Török, R., Prosser, A.: The European citizens’ initiative – a supranational approach towards eparticipation. In: Eixelsberger, W., Stember, J. (eds.) E-Government – Zwischen Partizipation und Kooperation, pp. 89–108. Springer, Wien (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, L., Zhou, S., Zhou, Z., Hong, Z., Huang, K.: A Reputation-based identity management model for cloud computing. Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2015). http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/. May 2015

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Parycek
    • 1
  • Judith Schossböck
    • 1
  • Bettina Rinnerbauer
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Danube University KremsKremsAustria

Personalised recommendations