Biometric Identification in eHealthcare: Learning from the Cases of Russia and Italy
Biometric identification technologies have become very popular in the last ten years. Applications that use biometrics are multiple and can be used for a variety of purposes: from physical access control, to authentication and access to information, recognition of people, etc. E-government is certainly a context where biometrics has a crucial role, because high level of assurance about the identity of citizens is required, whenever they interact by means of digital procedures with the Public Sector. Advanced technologies of digital identity may be seen as a factor influencing the quality improvement and raising the availability of services that require trusted environment.
This paper is aimed to find promising methods and models of building infrastructure of public and commercial services in the field of biometrics identification. Two practical cases (Russian and Italian) have been taken for the analysis in this regards. The authors are focused on modern technological trends in ICT- distribution of biometric technologies and mobile applications in the field of e-government and prepared conclusions on its best implementation not just in two studied countries but worldwide as well.
KeywordsBiometric identification eHealthcare Multiply identification Healthcare applications Voice identification
This work was partially financially supported by research work No.415825 “Development of opinion-mining tool for getting citizens’assessment on government activities”.
- 12.Economic 360 for Egypt: Growth Prospects and Emerging Opportunities in the Healthcare Industry (2011). https://frost.com/prod/servlet/report-brochure.pag?id=4721-01-00-00-00
- 13.Public Health: Improving health for all EU citizens (2013). http://ec.europa.eu/health/health_policies/docs/improving_health_for_all_eu_citizens_en.pdf
- 14.Patient Safety and Quality of Care. Special Euro barometer 411 (2013). http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_411_en.pdf
- 15.Market Statistics 2012. Biometric Technology Today, 16(6), 12 (2008). doi: 10.1016/S0969-4765(08)70168-1
- 16.Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On personal data №152 from 21.07.2014, art.11, p. 2 (2014)Google Scholar
- 17.Gamassi, M., Lazzaroni, M., Misino, M., Piuri, V., Sana, D., Scotti, F.: Acccuracy and performance of biometric systems. In: Proceedings of MTC 2004 – Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (2014). http://crema.di.unimi.it/~fscotti/ita/pdf/Scotti14.pdf
- 18.Privacy Guarantor General Act about Biometry November, 2014. Published in “Gazzetta Ufficiale” n. 280, 2 December 2014Google Scholar
- 19.Article 29 Working Party, European Commission, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 (1995)Google Scholar
- 20.Electronic identification and trust services (eIDAS): regulatory environment and beyond. Digital Agenda for Europe. European Commission Directorate General (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/en/content/electronic-identification-and-trust-services-eidas-regulatory-environment-and-beyond
- 21.Matveev, Y.N.: Biometric technologies of person identification by voice and other modalities, Vestnik MGTU. Priborostroenie. Biometric Technol. Special Issue 3(3), 46–61 (2012)Google Scholar
- 22.Gorelik, S., Lyaper, V., Bershadskaya, L., Buccafurri, F.: Breaking the barriers of e-participation: the experience of russian digital office development. In: Kȍ, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8650, pp. 173–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar