Carving Up Concepts? Differentiating Between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes Towards Legal Authority

Chapter

Abstract

In recent years, scholars of criminal justice and criminology have brought legitimacy to the forefront of academic and policy discussion. In the most influential definition, institutional trust is assumed to be an integral element of legitimacy, alongside duty to obey. For an individual to find a criminal justice institution to be legitimate, he or she must (a) believe that officials can be trusted to exercise their institutional power appropriately, and (b) feel a positive duty to obey rules and commands. In this chapter we argue that the nature, measurement, and motivating force of trust and legitimacy are in need of further explication. Considering these two concepts in a context of a type of authority that is both coercive and consent-based in nature, we make three claims: first, that legitimacy is the belief that an institution exhibits properties that justify its power and a duty to obey that is wrapped up in this sense of appropriateness; second, that trust is about positive expectations about valued behavior from institutional officials; and third, that legitimacy and institutional trust overlap conceptually if one assumes that people judge the appropriateness of the police as an institution on whether officers can be trusted to use their power appropriately. Our discussion will, we hope, be of broad theoretical and policy interest.

Keywords

Police Legitimacy Citizens Police-community relations Measurement Operationalization Conceptualization Legal compliance Cooperation Law enforcement 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Jonathan Jackson would like to thank Yale School Law and Harvard Kennedy School for hosting him while he coauthored this chapter; he is also grateful to the United Kingdom’s Economic and Social Research Council for funding the research leave (grant number ES/L011611/1).

References

  1. Antrobus, E., Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Sargeant, E. (2015). Community norms, procedural justice, and the public’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 151–170. doi: 10.1177/1043986214568840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, P. C. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring trust and trustworthiness. Political Concepts: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, 61, 1–27.Google Scholar
  5. Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Beetham, D. (2013). Revisiting legitimacy, twenty years on. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice (pp. 19–36). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittner, E. (1970). The functions of police in modern society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16, 265.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119–170.Google Scholar
  10. Bradford, B., Hohl, K., Jackson, J., & MacQueen, S. (2015). Obeying the rules of the road: Procedural justice, social identity and normative compliance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation and Governance, 8, 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Hough, M. (2014). Police legitimacy in action: Lessons for theory and practice. In M. Reisig & R. Kane (Eds.), The oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 551–570). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 19, 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunson, R. K. (2007). ‘Police don’t like black people’: African‐American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brunson, R. K., & Gau, J. M. (2014). Race, place, and policing the inner-city. In M. Reisig & R. J. Kane (Eds.), The oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 362–382). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cao, L., Frank, J., & Cullen, F. T. (1996). Race, community context and confidence in the police. American Journal of Police, 15, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flexon, J. L., Lurigio, A. J., & Greenleaf, R. G. (2009). Exploring the dimensions of trust in the police among Chicago juveniles. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Gau, J. M. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gau, J. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner‐city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geller, A., Fagan, J., Tyler, T. R., & Link, B. (2014). Aggressive policing and the mental health of young urban men. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 2321–2327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Granot, Y., Balcetis, E., Schneider, K. E., & Tyler, T. R. (2014). Justice is not blind: Visual attention exaggerates effects of group identification on legal punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Hawdon, J. (2008). Legitimacy, trust, social capital, and policing styles: A theoretical statement. Police Quarterly, 11, 182–201. doi: 10.1177/1098611107311852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hohl, K., Bradford, B., & Stanko, E. A. (2010). Influencing trust and confidence in the Metropolitan Police: Results from an experiment testing the effect of leaflet drops on public opinion. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 491–513. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azq005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013a). The governance of criminal justice, legitimacy and trust. In S. Body-Gendrot, R. Lévy, M. Hough, S. Snacken, & K. Kerezsi (Eds.), Routledge handbook of European criminology (pp. 243–265). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013b). Legitimacy, trust and compliance: an empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 326–352). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2011a). How do the purposes and targets of policing influence the basis of public cooperation with law enforcement? Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17, 419–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2011b). Mechanisms for eliciting cooperation in counterterrorism policing: A study of British Muslims. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 728–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson, J. (2015). On the dual motivational force of legitimate authority. In B. H. Bornstein & A. J. Tomkins (Eds.), Cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust. 62nd Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, J., Asif, M., Bradford, B., & Zakar, M. Z. (2014). Corruption and police legitimacy in Lahore, Pakistan. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 1067–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S. R., Widdop, S., et al. (2011). Developing European indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, E. A., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Kuha, J., & Hough, M. (2015). Empirical legitimacy as two connected psychological states. In G. Meško & J. Tankebe (Eds.), Improving legitimacy of criminal justice in emerging democracies (pp. 137–160). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Jackson, J., Huq, A. Z., Bradford, B., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes towards the acceptability of violence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 19, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jackson, J., & Sunshine, J. (2007). Public confidence in policing: A Neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 214–233. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azl031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, D., Maguire, E. R., & Kuhns, J. B. (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law and Society Review, 48, 947–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Justice, B., & Meares, T. L. (2014). How the criminal justice system educates citizens. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 651, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kochel, T., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30, 895–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.Google Scholar
  49. Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McEvily, B. (2011). Reorganizing the boundaries of trust: From discrete alternatives to hybrid forms. Organization science, 22, 1266–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meares, T. L. (2014). The law and social science of stop & frisk. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation and Governance, 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 397–440.Google Scholar
  55. Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96(1), 267–298.Google Scholar
  56. Rawls, J. (1964). Legal obligation and the duty of fair play. In S. Hook (Ed.), Law and philosophy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime: Results from a survey of Jamaican adolescents. Police Quarterly, 12, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice quarterly, 17, 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reith, C. (1952). The blind eye of history: A study of the origins of the present police era. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  61. Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. (2013). A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organization, 11, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schulhofer, S., Tyler, T., & Huq, A. (2011). American policing at a crossroads: Unsustainable policies and the procedural justice alternative. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 335–375.Google Scholar
  64. Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stoutland, S. (2001). The multiple dimensions of trust in resident/police relations in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 226–256. doi: 10.1177/0022427801038003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003a). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003b). Moral solidarity, identification with the community, and the importance of procedural justice: The police as prototypical representatives of a group’s moral values. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tankebe, J. (2009). Self-help, policing, and procedural justice: Ghanian vigilantism and the rule of law. Law and Society Review, 43, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tankebe, J., & Liebling, A. (2013). Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431–505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  77. Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy, 593, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tyler, T. R. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 307–359.Google Scholar
  81. Tyler, T. R. (2011a). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tyler, T. R. (2011b). Why people cooperate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Why do people cooperate with the police? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.Google Scholar
  84. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell-Sage.Google Scholar
  85. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tyler, T. R., Jackson, J., & Mentovich, A. (forthcoming, 2015). On the consequences of being a target of suspicion: Potential pitfalls of proactive police contact. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies.Google Scholar
  88. Tyler, T. R., Fagan, J. A., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 751–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S. J., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counter-terrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law and Society Review, 44, 365–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R., & Rojek, J. (2015). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantiative Criminology, doi: 10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Methodology and Mannheim Centre for CriminologyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations