The Timing of Experiences: How Far Can We Get with Simple Brain Time Models?

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Brain and Mind book series (SIBM, volume 9)

Abstract

When questioned, we are generally able to provide a coherent narrative regarding the order in which recent events happened. In considering this ability, many theorists have appealed to the idea that our perception of physical event timing might be related to the corresponding timing of neural events (i.e. brain time). However, a number of findings indicate that our perception does not slavishly follow from brain time, which might lead us to disregard the whole notion that the time of neural events is important. In this chapter we will suggest that this is premature. We will outline some simple models in which brain time matters, and discuss ways in which they would need to be developed to deal with the realities of our perceptual experiences. Our main point is not that these models are necessarily correct, but rather that theorists need to make alternative accounts similarly concrete and implementable before they will provide a compelling alternative.

Keywords

Time perception Order judgement Simultaneity judgement Neural latency Sensory events 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aschersleben, Gisa. 2002. Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition 48: 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burr, David, Ottavia Silva, Guido M. Cicchini, Martin S. Banks, and Maria C. Morrone. 2009. Temporal mechanisms of multimodal binding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 276: 1761–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardoso-Leite, Pedro, Andrei Gorea, and Pascal Mamassian. 2007. Temporal order judgment and simple reaction times: Evidence for a common processing system. Journal of Vision 7: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colonius, Hans, and Adele Diederich. 2004. Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: A time-window-of-integration model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennett, Daniel C., and Marcel Kinsbourne. 1992. Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15: 183–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunlap, Knight. 1910. Reactions on rhythmic stimuli, with attempt to synchronize. Psychological Review 17: 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eagleman, David M., and Terrence J. Sejnowski. 2000. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036–2038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ernst, Marc O., and Martin S. Banks. 2002. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraisse, Paul. 1980. Les synchronisations sensori-motrices aux rythmes [The sensorimotor synchronization of rhythms]. In Anticipation et comportement, ed. Jean Requin, 233–257. Paris: Centre National.Google Scholar
  10. Fredericksen, R. Eric, and Robert F. Hess. 1998. Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision. Vision Research 38: 1023–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fröhlich, Friedrich. 1923. Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58–78.Google Scholar
  12. Fujisaki, Waka, Shin Shimojo, Makio Kashino, and Shin’ya Nishida. 2004. Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience 7: 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujisaki, Waka, Anskar Koene, Derek Arnold, Alan Johnston, and Shin’ya Nishida. 2006. Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 273: 865–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Perez, Miguel A., and Rocio Alcala-Quintana. 2012. Response errors explain the failure of independent-channels models of perception of temporal order. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 94.Google Scholar
  15. Green, David M., and John A. Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hubel, David H. 1988. Eye, brain, and vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  17. Jazayeri, Mehrdad, and J. Anthony Movshon. 2006. Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations. Nature Neuroscience 9: 690–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffress, Lloyd A. 1948. A place theory of sound localization. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 41: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knill, David C., and Alexander Pouget. 2004. The bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences 27: 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ley, Ian, Patrick Haggard, and Kielan Yarrow. 2009. Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35: 1005–1019.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Jeff, and Wolfgang Schwarz. 2006. Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: A diffusion model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32: 394–412.Google Scholar
  22. Miyazaki, Makoto, Shinya Yamamoto, Sunao Uchida, and Shigeru Kitazawa. 2006. Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nature Neuroscience 9: 875–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moutoussis, Konstantinos, and Semir Zeki. 1997. A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nijhawan, Romi. 1994. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nishida, Shin’ya, and Alan Johnston. 2002. Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology 12: 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paillard, Jacques. 1949. Quelques données psychophysiologiques relatives au déclenchement de la commande motrice [Some psychophysiological data relating to the triggering of motor commands]. L’Année Psychologique 48: 28–47.Google Scholar
  27. Phillips, Ian. 2014. The temporal structure of experience. In Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality, ed. Valtteri Arstila and Dan Lloyd, 139–158. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Roach, Neil W., James Heron, David Whitaker, and Paul V. McGraw. 2011. Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 278: 1314–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roseboom, Warrick, Shin’ya Nishida, Waka Fujisaki, and Derek H. Arnold. 2011. Audio-visual speech timing sensitivity is enhanced in cluttered conditions. PLoS ONE 6: e18309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross, John, Maria C. Morrone, Michael E. Goldberg, and David C. Burr. 2001. Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences 24: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheier, C.R., Romi Nijhawan, and Shin Shimojo. 1999. Sound alters visual temporal resolution. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40: S792.Google Scholar
  32. Schneider, Keith A., and Daphne Bavelier. 2003. Components of visual prior entry. Cognitive Psychology 47: 333–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stelmach, Lew B., and Christopher M. Herdman. 1991. Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17: 539–550.Google Scholar
  34. Sternberg, Saul, and Ronald L. Knoll. 1973. The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In Attention and performance IV, ed. Sylvan Kornblum, 629–686. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  35. Ulrich, Rolf. 1987. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception and Psychophysics 42: 224–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van der Burg, Erik, David Alais, and John Cass. 2013. Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony. The Journal of Neuroscience 33: 14633–14637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Santen, Jan P.H., and George Sperling. 1985. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2: 300–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Wassenhove, Virginie, Ken W. Grant, and David Poeppel. 2007. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia 45: 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vroomen, Jean, Mirjam Keetels, Beatrice de Gelder, and Paul Bertelson. 2004. Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 22: 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitney, David, and Ikuya Murakami. 1998. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1: 656–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yarrow, Kielan, Patrick Haggard, Ron Heal, Peter Brown, and John C. Rothwell. 2001. Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity. Nature 414: 302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yarrow, Kielan, Helen Johnson, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2004. Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical efferent trigger. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 839–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yarrow, Kielan, Louise Whiteley, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2006. Biases in the perceived timing of perisaccadic perceptual and motor events. Perception & Psychophysics 68: 1217–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yarrow, Kielan, Patrick Haggard, and John C. Rothwell. 2010. Saccadic chronostasis and the continuity of subjective visual experience across eye movements. In Space and time in perception and action, ed. Romi Nijhawan and Beena Khurana, 149–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yarrow, Kielan, Nina Jahn, Szonya Durant, and Derek H. Arnold. 2011. Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Consciousness and Cognition 20: 1518–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yarrow, Kielan, Ingvild Sverdrup-Stueland, Warrick Roseboom, and Derek H. Arnold. 2013. Sensorimotor temporal recalibration within and across limbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39: 1678–1689.Google Scholar
  47. Zeki, Semir, and Andreas Bartels. 1998. The asynchrony of consciousness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 265: 1583–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCity University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations