WADS 2015: Algorithms and Data Structures pp 470-481 | Cite as

Dynamic Set Intersection

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9214)

Abstract

Consider the problem of maintaining a family F of dynamic sets subject to insertions, deletions, and set-intersection reporting queries: given \(S,S'\in F\), report every member of \(S\cap S'\) in any order. We show that in the word RAM model, where w is the word size, given a cap d on the maximum size of any set, we can support set intersection queries in \(O(\frac{d}{w/\log ^2 w})\) expected time, and updates in O(1) expected time. Using this algorithm we can list all t triangles of a graph \(G=(V,E)\) in \(O(m+\frac{m\alpha }{w/\log ^2 w} +t)\) expected time, where \(m=|E|\) and \(\alpha \) is the arboricity of G. This improves a 30-year old triangle enumeration algorithm of Chiba and Nishizeki running in \(O(m \alpha )\) time.

We provide an incremental data structure on F that supports intersection witness queries, where we only need to find one \(e\in S\cap S'\). Both queries and insertions take \(O\left( {\sqrt{\frac{N}{w/\log ^2 w}}}\right) \) expected time, where \(N=\sum _{S\in F} |S|\). Finally, we provide time/space tradeoffs for the fully dynamic set intersection reporting problem. Using M words of space, each update costs \(O(\sqrt{M \log N})\) expected time, each reporting query costs \(O(\frac{N\sqrt{\log N}}{\sqrt{M}}\sqrt{op+1})\) expected time where op is the size of the output, and each witness query costs \(O(\frac{N\sqrt{\log N}}{\sqrt{M}} + \log N)\) expected time.

Keywords

Hash Function Lookup Table Expected Time Query Cost Fast Matrix Multiplication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kopelowitz, T., Pettie, S., Porat, E.: Dynamic set intersection (2014). CoRR abs/1407.6755v2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masek, W.J., Paterson, M.: A faster algorithm computing string edit distances. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 20(1), 18–31 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myers, G.: A Four Russians algorithm for regular expression pattern matching. J. ACM 39(2), 432–448 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan, T.M.: More algorithms for all-pairs shortest paths in weighted graphs. SIAM J. Comput. 39(5), 2075–2089 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, T.M.: All-pairs shortest paths for unweighted undirected graphs in \(o(mn)\) time. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 8(4), 34 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan, T.M.: All-pairs shortest paths with real weights in \(o(n^3/\log n)\) time. Algorithmica 50(2), 236–243 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchin, K., Buchin, M., Meulemans, W., Mulzer, W.: Four soviets walk the dog - with an application to Alt’s conjecture. In: Proceedings 25th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 1399–1413 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baran, I., Demaine, E.D., Pǎtraşcu, M.: Subquadratic algorithms for 3SUM. Algorithmica 50(4), 584–596 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grønlund, A., Pettie, S.: Threesomes, degenerates, and love triangles. In: Proceedings 55th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (2014). Full manuscript available as arXiv:1404.0799
  10. 10.
    Chan, T.M.: The art of shaving logs. In: Dehne, F., Solis-Oba, R., Sack, J.-R. (eds.) WADS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8037, p. 231. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pǎtraşcu, M.: Towards polynomial lower bounds for dynamic problems. In: Proceedings 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 603–610 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kopelowitz, T., Pettie, S., Porat, E.: 3sum hardness in (dynamic) data structures (2014). CoRR abs/1407.6756Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Demaine, E.D., López-Ortiz, A., Munro, J.I.: Adaptive set intersections, unions, and differences. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 743–752 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barbay, J., Kenyon, C.: Adaptive intersection and t-threshold problems. In: Proceedings 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 390–399 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baeza-Yates, R.: A fast set intersection algorithm for sorted sequences. In: Sahinalp, S.C., Muthukrishnan, S., Dogrusoz, U. (eds.) CPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3109, pp. 400–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bille, P., Pagh, A., Pagh, R.: Fast evaluation of union-intersection expressions. In: Tokuyama, T. (ed.) ISAAC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4835, pp. 739–750. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen, H., Porat, E.: Fast set intersection and two-patterns matching. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(40–42), 3795–3800 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Itai, A., Rodeh, M.: Finding a minimum circuit in a graph. SIAM J. Comput. 7(4), 413–423 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chiba, N., Nishizeki, T.: Arboricity and subgraph listing algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 14(1), 210–223 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Björklund, A., Pagh, R., Williams, V.V., Zwick, U.: Listing triangles. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 223–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Albers, S., Hagerup, T.: Improved parallel integer sorting without concurrent writing. Inf. Comput. 136(1), 25–51 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fredman, M.L., Willard, D.E.: Surpassing the information theoretic bound with fusion trees. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 47(3), 424–436 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brodnik, A., Miltersen, P.B., Munro, J.I.: Trans-dichotomous algorithms without multiplication—some upper and lower bounds. In: Rau-Chaplin, A., Dehne, F., Sack, J.-R., Tamassia, R. (eds.) WADS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1272, pp. 426–439. Springer, Heidelberg (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations