The Future for Responsible Leadership

  • Mario Fernando

Abstract

The responsible leadership field is still in its formative years: current responsible leadership research focuses more on clarifying the attributes of the concept and process than on the outcome variables, such as its link to productivity and organizational performance. But if the claims regarding responsible leadership are valid, the benefits to be derived at the individual, organizational and societal levels in the Asian century are too vast to gloss over. Thus this concluding chapter will address the need to develop appropriate research designs to capture and apply the concept of responsible leadership. It will emphasize the need for scholars to contribute theoretically and empirically to the development of responsible leadership discourse as well as approaches to teaching responsible leadership in business schools, so that leaders have the necessary skills and tools to enact responsible leadership in the Asian century.

Keywords

Business Ethic Business School Ethical Leadership Organizational Citizenship Behavior Critical Reflection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alavinia, S. M., Molenaar, D., & Burdorf, A. (2009). Productivity loss in the workforce: Associations with health, work demands, and individual characteristics. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 52(1), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Brookfield, S. D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Butterwick, S., & Lawrence, R. L. (2009). Creating alternative realities: Arts-based approaches to transformative learning. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caverley, N., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2007). Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New directions for adult and continuing education, 93, 63–72.Google Scholar
  8. Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delahaye, B. L. (2005). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. Milton: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  11. Duarte, F. (2010). Addressing student synicism through transformative learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 7(1), 4.Google Scholar
  12. Fernando, M. (2001). Are popular management techniques a waste of time? The Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernando, M. (2011). A social innovation based transformative learning approach to teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8, 119–138.Google Scholar
  14. Fernando, M., & McLean, P. D. (2010). Embedding notions of community in the teaching-research nexus: A case study. In M. Devlin, J. B. Nagy, & A. M. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) annual international conference, pp. 289–299). Milperra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.Google Scholar
  15. Goetzel, R. Z., Long, S. R., Ozminkowski, R. J., Hawkins, K., Wang, S., & Lynch, W. (2006). Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S. employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, C. D., & Andersen, J. H. (2008). Going ill to work: What personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Social Science & Medicine, 67(6), 956–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iverson, D., Lewis, K. L., Caputi, P., & Knospe, S. (2010). The cumulative impact and associated costs of multiple health conditions on employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1206–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy. Cambridge: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  22. Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Langan, D., Sheese, R., & Davidson, D. (2009). Constructive teaching and learning: Collaboration in a sociology classroom. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacLeod, R., & Egan, A. (2009). Transformation in palliative care. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace and higher education (pp. 111–121). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice – New directions for adult and continuing education (No. 74, pp. 5–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Pless, N. M. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pruzan, P., & Miller, W. C. (2006). Spirituality as the basis of responsible leaders and responsible companies. In T. Maak & N. M. Pless (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 68–92). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Rossouw, G. (2002). Three approaches to teaching business ethics. Teaching Business Ethics, 6(4), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Starbuck, W. H. (1996). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 484–515). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 523–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sydenstricker-Neto, J. (1997). Research design and mixed-method approach: A hands-on experience. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Sydenstricker/bolsa.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2010.
  37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zingales, L. (2012). Do business schools incubate criminals? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-07-16/do-business-schools-incubate-criminals-. Accessed 26 Apr 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Fernando
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations