Advertisement

Trends in Women’s and Men’s Time Use, 1965–2012: Back to the Future?

  • Liana C. SayerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the National Symposium on Family Issues book series (NSFI, volume 6)

Abstract

Women’s and men’s time use is more similar today than it was in the 1960s, when specialization in adult roles was at its peak, but convergence remains stubbornly out of sight. This chapter updates earlier trend studies of time use and finds that recent data confirm the most consistent findings from earlier analyses. The greater similarity of women’s and men’s time use today is due much more to changes among women than among men. Further, despite declines in women’s housework time, the increase in women’s childcare time and paid work time has resulted in a gender gap in leisure time. New findings from this analysis reveal the gender gap in leisure is accounted for by men’s higher levels of television time.

Keywords

Time use Trends studies of time use Housework Child care Developmental child care Paid work hours Leisure Self care Television time Second shift Third shift Gendered time use Gender gap Gender inequality Division of labor American’s use of time study Time diary 

References

  1. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Sayer, L. C. (2001). Family interaction, social capital, and trends in time use study (FISCT) (grant). Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does, or will do it and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, C. E., & Rieker, P. P. (2008). Gender and health: The effects of constrained choices and social policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bittman, M., Matheson, G., & Meagher, G. (1999). The changing boundary between home and market: Australian trends in outsourcing domestic labour. Work Employment and Society, 13, 249–273.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014). American time use survey user’s guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  7. Burgard, S. A., & Ailshire, J. A. (2013). Gender and time for sleep among U.S. adults. American Sociological Review, 78, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, P. N. (2014). The family: Diversity, inequality, and social change. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2009). Spousal economic factors in ATUS parents’ time choices. Social Indicators Research, 93, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Converse, P. E., & Robinson, J. P. (1980). American’s use of time, 1965–1966. (ICPSR 7254). Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07254.v1. Accessed 1 Sep 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Cooke, L. P., & Baxter, J. (2010). “Families” in international context: Comparing institutional effects across western societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  16. Cotter, D., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2011). The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coverman, S., & Sheley, J. F. (1986). Change in men’s housework and child-care time, 1965–1975. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare. American Sociological Review, 76, 834–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2013). Parental leisure time: A gender comparison in five countries. Social Politics, 20, 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Elliott, S., & Umberson, D. (2008). The performance of desire: Gender and sexual negotiation in long-term marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. England, P. (2011). Reassessing the uneven gender revolution and its slowdown. Gender & Society, 25, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gauthier, A. H., Smeeding, T. M., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2004). Are parents investing less time in children? Trends in selected industrialized countries. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 647–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grunow, D., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2012). What determines change in the division of housework over the course of marriage? International Sociology, 27, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 700–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (1997). Housework, fixed effects, and the wages of married mothers. The Journal of Human Resources, 32, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodges, M. J., & Budig, M. J. (2010). Who gets the daddy bonus? Gender & Society, 24, 717–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackman, M. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Juster, F. T. (1985). The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from recall diaries. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being (pp. 63–91). Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  34. Juster, F. T. (1999). Time use data: Analytic framework, descriptive findings, and measurement issues. Paper prepared for the National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics Workshop on Measurement of Research on Time Use. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9866&page=74. Accessed 1 Sep 2001.
  35. Juster, F. T., Courant, P., Duncan, G. J., Robinson, J. P., & Stafford, F. P. (1979). Time use in economic and social accounts, 1975–1976. (ICPSR 7580). Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).Google Scholar
  36. Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33, 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Race, class and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Macdonald, C. L. (2010). Shadow mothers: Nannies, au pairs, and the micropolitics of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Man, Y. K., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45, 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marini, M. M., & Shelton, B. A. (1993). Measuring household work: Recent experience in the United States. Social Science Research, 22, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81, 999–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mattingly, M., & Sayer, L. C. (2006). Under pressure: Gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maume, D. J., Sebastian, R. A., & Bardo, A. R. (2010). Gender, work-family responsibilities, and sleep. Gender & Society, 24, 746–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milkie, M. A., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). Taking on the second shift: Time allocations and time pressures of U.S. parents with preschoolers. Social Forces, 88, 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nomaguchi, K. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2004). Exercise time: Gender differences in the effects of marriage, parenthood, and employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raley, S., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raley, S., Bianchi, S. M., & Wang, W. (2012). When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1422–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time (2nd ed.) University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The Age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time, and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work, and free time. Social Forces, 84, 285–303.Google Scholar
  52. Sayer, L. C. (2010). Trends in housework. In J. Treas & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective (pp. 19–38). Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sayer, L. C., England, P., Bittman, M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). How long is the second (plus first) shift? Gender differences in paid, unpaid, and total work time in Australia and the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40, 523–545.Google Scholar
  55. Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework and leisure. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  56. Shows, C., & Gerstel, N. (2009). Fathering, class, and gender. Gender & Society, 23, 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, K., & Mattingly, M. J. (2012). Are all recessions the same? Husbandsjob loss and wives’ labor force participation during economic downturns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Population Association of America, San Francisco, CA (May).Google Scholar
  58. Smith, K., Downs, B., & O’Connell, M. (2001). Maternity leave and employment patterns: 1961–1995 (Rep. No. P70–79). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  59. Stinson, L. L. (1999). Measuring how people spend their time. Paper prepared for the Joint Statistical Meetings, Baltimore, MD (August).Google Scholar
  60. Stone, P. (2007). Opting out: Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2001). Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology, 52, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Szalai, A. (1972). The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
  63. Twiggs, J. E., McQuillan, J., & Ferree, M. M. (1999). Meaning and measurement: Reconceptualizing measures of the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 712–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations