Advertisement

A Representational Analysis of the API4KP Metamodel

  • Adrian PaschkeEmail author
  • Tara Athan
  • Davide Sottara
  • Elisa Kendall
  • Roy Bell
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 225)

Abstract

The API for Knowledge Platforms (API4KP) provides a common abstraction interface for discovery, exploration of metadata and querying of different types of knowledge bases. It targets the basic administration services as well as the retrieval and the modification of expressions in machine-readable knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) languages, such as RDF(S), OWL, RuleML and Common Logic, within heterogeneous and possibly distributed (multi-language, multi-nature) knowledge platforms. This paper introduces typical use cases for API4KP and, based on their ontological requirements, analyses the representational completeness and clarity of its ontological metamodel.

Keywords

Knowledge Source Knowledge Resource Object Management Group Knowledge Item Knowledge Asset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP): Core. http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc3920.html
  2. 2.
    Athan, T., Bell, R., Kendall, E., Paschke, A., Sottara, D.: API4KP metamodel: a meta-API for Heterogeneous knowledge platforms. In: Proceedings of RuleML 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Developing a meta model for the bunge-wand-weber ontological constructs. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 75–91 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mellor, S.J., Kendall, S., Uhl, A., Weise, D.: MDA Distilled. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc, Redwood City (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Object Management Group (OMG): API4KB request for proposal. http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/API4KB.html
  6. 6.
    Object Management Group (OMG): OntoIOp request for proposal. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2013-12-02
  7. 7.
    The distributed ontology, model, and specication language (dol). https://github.com/tillmo/DOL/blob/master/Standard/ebnf-OMG_OntoIOp_current.pdf
  8. 8.
    Kozlenkov, A., Jeffery, D., Paschke, A.: State management and concurrency in event processing. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, DEBS 2009, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, July 6–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M.: A reference methodology for conducting ontological analyses. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 110–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Paschke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tara Athan
    • 2
  • Davide Sottara
    • 3
  • Elisa Kendall
    • 4
  • Roy Bell
    • 5
  1. 1.AG Corporate Semantic WebFreie Universitaet BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Athan Services (athant.com)West LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical InformaticsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  4. 4.Thematix Partners LLCNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.RaytheonFort WayneUSA

Personalised recommendations