Advertisement

Getting the Balance Right: The Ethics of Researching Women Trafficked for Commercial Sexual Exploitation

  • Helen EastonEmail author
  • Roger Matthews
Chapter
Part of the Studies of Organized Crime book series (SOOC, volume 13)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the ethical issues associated with researching women who have been trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation. It refers to two studies conducted by the authors. The first was a study commissioned by the Scottish Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) as part of a wider Inquiry into Human Trafficking in Scotland. The second was a study of women exiting prostitution which included a small sample of trafficked women accessed through the Poppy Project in London. What became apparent during both of these studies was the way in which researching those who have been trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation can become a balancing act between gathering and presenting robust evidence about women’s individual experiences and ensuring the physical and emotional safety of the research subjects. Throughout both studies, the researchers needed to negotiate the methodological approach, work in partnership with stakeholders and manage issues around the limits of confidentiality and anonymity. A further balancing act was progressing fieldwork and analysis at a suitable pace for the commissioner while also being reflexive and taking care of the needs of women participants and the researcher’s personal responses to the subject matter. Although alive with ethical and moral issues, research that examines women’s experiences and presents these clearly without causing harm is fundamental to both the policy process and to the development of knowledge about human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation as well as how to conduct sensitive research with vulnerable victims.

Keywords

Human trafficking Commercial sexual exploitation Research ethics Qualitative interviewing Counter transference Vicarious trauma 

References

  1. Alexander, J., de Chesnay, M., Marshall, E., Campbell, A., Johnson, S., & Wright, R. (1989). Research note: Parallel reactions in rape victims and rape researchers. Violence and Victims, 4(1), 57–62.Google Scholar
  2. Andrees, B., & van der Linden, M. (2005). Designing trafficking research from a labour market perspective: The ILO experience. International Migration, 43(1–2), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bales, K. (2003). Because she looks like a child. In B. Ehrenreich & A. Hochschild (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  4. Beale, B., & Hillege, S. (2004). Impact of in-depth interviews on the interviewer: Roller coaster ride. Nursing and Health Sciences, 6, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2012). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles, G., & Duelli Klein, R. (Eds.). (1983).Theories of women’s studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Brannen, J. (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: An overview. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, D. (2005). Methodological challenges in research with trafficked persons: Tales from the field. International Migration, 43(1–2), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewer, J. (1990). Sensitivity as a problem in field research: A study of routine policing in Northern Ireland. American Behavioural Scientist, 33, 578–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. British Society of Criminology’s Code of Ethics for Researchers in the Field of Criminology. (2006). http://www.britsoccrim.org/docs/CodeofEthics.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
  12. Burman, M., Batchelor, S., & Brown, J. (2001). Researching girls and violence: Facing the dilemmas of fieldwork. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callender, C. (1996). Contract research and academic freedom. In H. Dean (Ed.), Ethics and social policy research. Luton: University of Luton Press in Association with the Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
  14. Cambell, R. (2004). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cannon, S. (1989). Social research in stressful settings: Difficulties for the sociologist studying the treatment of breast cancer. Sociology of Health and Illness, 11(1), 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coles, J., & Mudaly, N. (2010). Staying safe: Strategies for qualitative child abuse researchers. Child Abuse Review, 19(1), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coyle, A., & Wright, C. (1996). Using the counseling interview to collect research data on sensitive topics. Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cusick, L., Kinnell, H., Brooks-Gordon, B., & Campbell, R. (2009). Wild guesses and conflated meanings? Estimating the size of the sex worker population in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 29(4), 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cwikel, J., & Hoban, E. (2005). Contentious issues in research on trafficked women working in the sex industry: Study design, ethics and methodology. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dane, B. (2000). Child welfare workers: An innovative approach to interacting with secondary trauma. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 27–38.Google Scholar
  21. Danieli, Y. (1988). Confronting the unimaginable: Psychotherapists’ reactions to victims of the Nazi Holocaust. In J. Wilson & J. Lindy (Eds.), Human adaptation to extreme stress. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  22. Easton, H., & Matthews, R. (2012). Investigating the experiences of people trafficked into commercial sexual exploitation, research report 82. Glasgow: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  23. Economic and Social Research Council (2012). Framework for research ethics. Swindon. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/framework-for-research-ethics-09-12_tcm8-4586.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2014.
  24. Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2011). Inquiry into human trafficking in Scotland: Report of the equality and human rights commission. Glasgow: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  25. Farberow, N. (1963). Introduction. In N. Farberow (Ed.), Taboo topics. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  26. Figley, C. (1995). Compassion fatigue as secondary traumatic stress disorder: An overview. In C. Figley (Ed.), Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatised. New York: Bunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  27. Fincham, B., Scourfield, J., & Langer, S. (2008). The impact of working with disturbing secondary data: Reading suicide files in a coroner’s office. Qualitative Health Research, 18(6), 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freud, S. (1958). The dynamics of countertransference. In J. Strachey (Ed. and trans), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  29. Game, A. (1997). Sociology’s emotions’. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 34, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaskell, C. (2008). Isolation and distress’? (Re)thinking the place of emotions in youth research. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gelsthorpe, L. (1992). Response to Martyn Hammersley’s paper “on feminist methodology”. Sociology, 26(2), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilbert, K. (2001). Introduction: Why are we interested in emotions? In K. Gilbert (Ed.), The emotional nature of qualitative research. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Goodrum, S., & Keys, J. (2007). Reflections on two studies of emotionally sensitive topics: Bereavement from murder and abortion. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(4), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grinyer, A. (2005). Personal agendas in emotionally demanding research, Social Research Update. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU46.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
  35. Hammersley, M. (2014). On ethical principles for social research, International journal of social research methodology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.924169. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
  36. Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Herman, J. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., & Kemmer, D. (2001). Working with emotions: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, B., & Clarke, J. (2003). Collecting sensitive data: The impact on the researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 13(3), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Katz, J. (2002). How emotions work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kelly, L. (2002). Journeys of jeopardy: A review of research on trafficking in women and children in Europe. Geneva: International Organisation for Migration.Google Scholar
  45. Kelly, L. (2005). “You can find anything you want”: A critical reflection on research on trafficking in persons within and into Europe. International Migration, 43(1–2), 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kleinmann, S., & Copp, M. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Kleinmann, A., & Kleinmann, J. (1997). The appeal of experience; the dismay of images: Cultural appropriations of suffering in our times. In A. Kleinmann, et al. (Eds.), Social suffering. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lalor, J., Begley, C., & Devane, D. (2006). Exploring painful experiences: Impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(6), 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, R. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, R., & Renzetti, C. (1990). The problems of researching sensitive topics: An overview and introduction. American Behavioural Scientist, 33, 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liebling, A., & Stanko, B. (2001). Allegiance and ambivalence: Some dilemmas in researching disorder and violence. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manz, B. (2002). Terror, grief and recovery: Genocidal trauma in a Mayan village in Guatemala. In A. Hinton (Ed.), Annihilating difference: The anthropology of genocide. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Matthews, R. (2014). Female prostitution and victimisation: A realist analysis, International review of victimology. http://irv.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/02/0269758014547994. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
  54. McCann, I., & Pearlman, L. (1990). Vicarious traumatisation: A framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies, 3, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Melrose, M. (2002). Labour pains: Some considerations on the difficulties of researching juvenile prostitution. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(4), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pearlman, L., & Saakvitne, K. (Eds.). (1995). Trauma and the therapist: Countertransference and vicarious traumatisation in psychotherapy with incest survivors. New York: Norton and Company Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Rager, K. (2005). Self care and the qualitative researcher: When data can break your heart. Qualitative Researcher, 34, 23–27.Google Scholar
  58. Renzetti, C., & Lee, R. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Rostocki, A. (1986). Sensitive questions in sociological survey. Polish Sociological Bulletin, 75, 27–32.Google Scholar
  60. Rowling, L. (1999). Being in, being out, being with: Affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality, 4, 167–81Google Scholar
  61. Schauben, L., & Frazier, P. (1995). Vicarious trauma: The effects on female counsellors of working with sexual violence survivors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scott, S. (1998). Here be dragons: Researching the unbelievable, hearing the unthinkable: A feminist sociologist in uncharted territory. Sociological research online, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/3/1.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2015.
  63. Sexton, L. (1999). Vicarious traumatisation of counsellors and effects on workplaces. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 27, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sieber, J., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist, 43, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  66. Wakeman, S. (2014). Fieldwork, biography and emotion: Doing criminological autoethography. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warr, D. (2004). Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: Reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(4), 578–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Williamson, E., Goodenough, T., Kent, J., & Ashcroft, R. (2005). Conducting research with children: The limits of confidentiality and child protection protocols. Children and Society, 19(5), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, J., & Lindy, J. (1994). Empathic strain and countertransference. In J. Wilson & J. Lindy (Eds.), Countertransference in the treatment of PTSD. London: Guildford.Google Scholar
  70. Wincup, E. (2001). Feminist research with women awaiting trial: The effects on participants in the qualitative research process. In K. Gilbert (Ed.), The emotional nature of qualitative research. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  71. Woodby, L., Williams, B., Wittich, A., & Burgio, K. (2011). Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding. Qualitative Health Research, 21(6), 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zimmerman, C., & Watts, C. (2003). WHO ethical and safety recommendations for interviewing trafficked women. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  73. Zimmerman, C., Hossain, M., Yun, K., Roche, B., Morison, L., & Watts, C. (2006). Stolen smiles: A summary report on the physical and psychological health consequences of women and adolescents trafficked in Europe. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.Google Scholar
  74. University of Brighton. (undated). Illegal activities: Implications for researchers. http://about.brighton.ac.uk/hss/fregc/Illegal-activities.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law and Social SciencesLondon South Bank UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations