Introduction: The Variety of Ethical Dilemmas
Abstract
Ethical issues have become an integral part of the process of preparing, conducting and publishing empirical research in the social sciences. These days, students are being trained in all kinds of skills and techniques for doing ‘ethical research’. The research protocols include detailed instructions and warnings about potential risks and harms and the dangers of manipulation and concealment. Such concerns about the ethical aspects of social research are typical of our ‘risk society’ (Beck, Risk society: Towards a new modernity, 1992) and our ‘culture of control’ (Garland, The culture of control, 2001). While medical sciences in particular are rightfully considered to be the most risk-producing disciplines, the social sciences are also strongly affected by research ethics protocols (Haggerty, Qualitative Sociology 27(4):392, 2004). However, risk management, regulation and overregulation of research ethics pose dangers to our ability to conduct research and produce knowledge. In the words of Adler and Adler (Walking the tightrope. Ethical issues for qualitative researchers, p. 42, 2002): ‘If you fundamentally shut down research there is no risk to subjects because researchers will not know anything’. In order to avoid such an extreme situation and to be able to continue doing research in criminology and anthropology, especially where qualitative methods are involved, scientists need to be alert to any obstacles, exaggerations or new regulations that could hinder their fieldwork activities.
Keywords
Qualitative research methods fieldwork risks harms protocolsReferences
- Adler, P., & Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In Van den W. Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope. Ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brandt, A. (1978). Racism, research and the Tuskegee syphilis study (Report no. 8). New York: Hastings Center.Google Scholar
- Danwall, S. (1998). Philosophical ethics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Ferrell, J., & Hamm, M. (1998). Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance and field research. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Haggerty, K. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Israel, M. (2004). Strictly confidential? Integrity and the disclosure of criminological and socio-legal research. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 715–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lowman, J., & Palys, T. (2001). Limited confidentiality, academic freedom and matters of conscience: Where does CPA stand? Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(4), 497–508.Google Scholar
- Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83–97). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sluka, J. (1990). Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organizations, 49(2), 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland, E., & Cressey, D. (1960). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
- Wolfgang, M. E. (1981). Confidentiality in criminological research and other ethical issues. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72(1 Spring), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar