Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 45))

Abstract

This chapter traces changes to English universities as a result of changing political economic conditions in the United Kingdom. These conditions shifted funding and governance mechanisms in unprecedented ways, and so entailed dramatic transformations for English universities. The chapter calls attention to the “imaginators,” meaning a group of campus officials and government officers, who systematically laid the groundwork for these reforms. Analysis of documents such as speeches and policy reports highlights the imaginators’ collective efforts to recast and repurpose existing university infrastructure. This effort has been gradual and concerted, creating mechanisms that could be redeployed when the Great Recession provided a crisis moment. The resulting system yields numerous opportunities for private-sector actors to capture profits from state-subsidized activities, but may provide more limited options to students and faculty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Household debt rose from 69 % of GDP in 1997 to 100 % in 2006 – even before the recession hit – before peaking at 110 % in 2009 and falling back slightly to 99 % now [2013]’ (Jones 2013).

  2. 2.

    The panel chairman, John Browne, was a businessman close to Mandelson and the Labour government. As chief executive of BP he was lauded for the expansion of BP into the USA and Russia and his ‘Sun King’ autocratic style, but later criticised as responsible for instilling high risk strategies and a poor safety culture. He was forced to resign as chief executive of BP when found by a judge to have lied to the court but perjury did not disqualify him from chairing a national review of an institution whose role some would describe as fearless pursuit of truth. Other members of the panel were: two vice chancellors, one with engineering expertise and the other formerly chief executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England; a former adviser to Blair and Obama on education reforms who was currently head of McKinsey’s Global Education Practice; a former director McKinsey & Co, now chief executive of Standard Chartered bank; an economist specialising in competition analysis; and a former chairman of the British Youth Council now on the Lottery Fund board. The panel consisted of no representatives of students or academics.

  3. 3.

    RAB stands for Resource Accounting and Budgeting.

  4. 4.

    Vice chancellors’ average pay had increased from £92,000 in 1994/1995 to £254,000 in 2009/2010. The prime minister, on £142,000, was paid less than every vice chancellor. Pay differentials within the university had also widened from 1994/2005 when vice chancellors were paid 2.8 times as much as a top senior lecturer, to 4.6 times the pay of a top senior lecturer in 2009/2010. Vice chancellors model their argument for such pay on those of private executives. The High Pay Commission in 2010 was highly critical of such widening differentials. In a period what FTSE 100 executives’ pay had risen by 49 %, their average employee’s pay had risen by 2.7 %, and these were often executive rewards for failure. It was also critical of the argument that executives of complex organisations in international markets deserve high salaries; there was no evidence of international competition for talent because only 1 FTSE 100 CEO had been poached in 5 years. Universities clearly share with corporations a moral hazard when managers divert such a large share of resources to private purposes as de facto owners that they think themselves stewards of their own enterprise.

  5. 5.

    BBC Wales reporters found that the University of Wales, founded 1893, had become a ‘validation machine’, selling its powers to validate degrees to bogus operators. In 2003–2004 the university validated 20 organisations in the UK and 55 overseas, generating £3 million (40 % of its income). By 2009–2010, the university earned £10.3 million from about 140 collaborative centres in 30 countries. The vice chancellor’s salary and pension package also rose from £84,284 in 2007–2008 (the year he was appointed) to £139,000 in 2009–2010. The QAA’s 2001 inspection said it had confidence in the university, but the university admitted it outsourced much of the validation work to academics in other universities by making a financial contribution to their department. The second BBC Wales undercover investigation not only found that the checks were inadequate but also an alleged visa scam at a University of Wales collaborative centre, Rayat London College. In autumn 2011, the University of Wales was dissolved (Matthews 2012).

  6. 6.

    Laureate is endowed by Harvard University and in England already offered online degrees in partnership with Liverpool University, but its main business plan was to take control of failing institutions with local degree awarding powers and run them as autonomous institutions (e.g. College of Santa Fe New Mexico where the city took over its assets and debts and leased it to Laureate).

  7. 7.

    ITT Educational Services was owned by Career Education Corporation, which had a London campus offering degrees accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (recognised by US Department of Education) but which failed an audit by UK’s Quality Assurance Agency.

  8. 8.

    State-owned companies that have been sold include BP, National Enterprise Board, Regional Water Authorities, Property Services Agency, British Aerospace, Cable and Wireless (global communications), Amersham International (computers), National Freight Company, the land owned by the Forestry Commission, Railways. The list goes on and most recently includes the Post Office.

References

  • Baker, S. (2010). Private practice. Times Higher Education, 9 Sept, pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhradnia, B., & Thompson, J. (2013). The cost of the government’s reforms of the financing of higher education – An update. London: HEPI. 17 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2011). Students at the heart of the system’ higher education white paper. London: HMSO. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills). (2014). Participation rates in higher education: 2006–2013. London: Gov.uk. 28 Aug, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/participation-rates-in-higher-education-2006-to-2013

  • Browne, J., & Lord Browne of Madingley. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education. An independent review of higher education funding and student finance. 2 Oct from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/hereview.independent.gov.uk/hereview/report/

  • Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Report of the national committee of inquiry into higher education. Norwich: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (1998). The learning age-a renaissance for a New Britain (green paper). http://www.lifelonglearning.co.uk/greenpaper/ and http://www.logos-net.net/ilo/150_base/en/init/uk_1.htm. Accessed 31 Oct 2003.

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2003). The future of higher education (white paper), Cm. 5735, January. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2004). Higher education act 2004, July. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/8/pdfs/ukpga_20040008_en.pdf

  • Eversheds. (2009). Developing future university structures: New funding and legal models. London: Universities UK. September, http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2009/FutureUniversityStructures.pdf

  • Fielden, J., Middlehurst, R., Woodfield, S., & Olcott, D. (2010). The growth of private and for-profit higher education providers in the UK’. London: Universities UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher, J., & Raffe, D. (2011). Higher education policy in post-devolution UK: More convergence than divergence? Journal of Education Policy, 27(4), 467–490. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.62608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. (2014). That’s the home office dealt with – What’s next? Times Higher Education, 2 Oct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansard (2004). Higher education bill (second reading), 27 January, cols. 167–284, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/cm040127/debtext/40127-06.htm. Accessed 29 Mar 2004.

  • HEPI. (2014). How to read the new BIS select committee report on student loans. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute blog, 22 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotson, H. (2011). Short cuts: For-profit universities. London Review of Books, 33(11), 19, 2 June. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n11/howard-hotson/short-cuts

  • IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research). (2013a). An avalanche is coming. Higher education and the revolution ahead. London: IPPR. March.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPR (Institute for Public Policy Research). (2013b). A critical path. Securing the future of higher education in England. London: IPPR. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarratt, A. (1985). Report of the steering committee for efficiency studies in universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jary, D., & Thomas, E. (1999). Widening participation and life-long learning – Rhetoric and reality. The role of research and the reflexive practitioner. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2013). Dominic Raab reveals Britain’s true debt burden. The Spectator, 4 May. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/05/dominic-raab-reveals-britains-true-debt-burden/

  • Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R., & McBride, S. (2008). The OECD and transnational governance. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. (2014). Student fees policy likely to cost more than the system it replaced. The Guardian, 21 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. (2012). Boom and bust. Times Higher Education, 5 January. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/418612.article

  • Matthews, D. (2014a). Students launch legal action over withdrawal of 60 visa sponsorships. Times Higher Education, 13 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. (2014b). Glyndwr planted the seeds of its financial woe some time ago. Times Higher Education, 17 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGettigan, A. (2012a). False accounting? Why the government’s higher education reforms don’t add up. London: Intergenerational Foundation. http://www.if.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/False-Accounting_-Why-Higher-Education-Reforms-dont-add-up.pdf

  • McGettigan, A. (2012b). NCH – New company structure. Critical Education Blog, 1 Sept. http://andrewmcgettigan.org/2012/09/01/nch-new-company-structure/

  • McQuillan, M. (2012). Another fine mess. Times Higher Education, 13 Sept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., & Fielden, J. (2011). Private providers in UK higher education: Some policy options. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). 5 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2010). Massive cut in Britain. Inside Higher Education, 21 Oct. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/10/21/britain

  • Morgan, J. (2012a). Fire sale feared as London met faces flood of red ink. Times Higher Education, 6 Sept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2012b). Company policy: Where UCLAN restructure plans lead, post-1992s may follow. Times Higher Education, 22 Nov.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2013a). Be wary, the kraken may be waking. Times Higher Education, 7 Feb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2013b). Expert voices raise alarm over capless costs. Times Higher Education, 19 Dec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014a). “Massive” budget hole predicted as RAB charge rises. Times Higher Education, 21 Mar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014b). For-profit won the title (and a “Premier League” debt to boot). Times Higher Education, 1 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014c). “Our ownership model ought to be an irrelevance”. Times Higher Education, 22 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014d). If the loan book sale isn’t going to fund student expansion, what will?. Times Higher Education, 24 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014e). David Willetts’ loan book plan: smart business of half-baked? Times Higher Education, 7 Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014f). For-profits investigated amid fears of fraud. Times Higher Education, 19 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2014g). Pearson rehomes private outcasts. Times Higher Education. 28 Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, K. (2010). Associations, networks, alliances etc. Making sense of the emerging global higher education landscape. A discussion Paper presented to the IAU conference. Mexico City, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • PA Consulting. (2009). Escaping the red queen effect: Succeeding in the new economies of higher education. London: PA Consulting Group. http://www.cisco.com/web/offer/emea/11046/docs/Escaping_the_Red_Queen_effect.pdf

  • PA Consulting. (2010). A passing storm, or permanent climate change? Vice chancellors’ views on the outlook for universities. London: PA Consulting Group. http://hedbib.iau-aiu.net/pdf/PAConsulting_2010_Passing_Storm.pdf

  • PA Consulting. (2014). Here be dragons. How universities are navigating the uncharted waters of higher education. London: PA Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • PAC (Public Accounts Committee). (2014). Student loan repayments. Fourty-fourth report of session 2013–14. London: House of Commons HC886, 14 Feb.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2010). In the eye of the storm: moving from collaboration to consolidation. London: PwC Public Sector Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F. (2006). Imagination and the globalisation of educational policy research. Globalisation Societies and Education, 4(2), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., Dale, R., Moutsios, S., Nielsen, G., Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2012). Globalisation and regionalisation in higher education: Toward a new conceptual framework. Summative Paper on URGE work package 1, working papers in university reform no 20. Copenhagen: Danish School of Education, Aarhus University, February. http://edu.au.dk/fileadmin/www.dpu.dk/forskningsprogrammer/epoke/WP_20_-_final.pdf

  • Select Committee on Business, Innovation and Skills. (2011). Twelfth report. Government reform of higher education. London: Parliament, November. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmbis/885/88502.htm

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (EASA series, pp. 57–89). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2014). Why universities should not buy their loan books. HEPI Blog, 4 Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, H. (2012). Could universities be sold off? The Guardian, 23 April. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/apr/23/college-of-law-private-sale

  • Thorne, M. (Ed.). (1999). Foresight, universities in the future. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Office of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education. (2011). Minister meets with equity firms to discuss education over dinner. 22/29 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education. (2014). Watchdog called in on private college use of student loans. 22 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasagar, J., Wintour, P., & Mulholland, H. (2011). David Willetts on back foot over extra university places for higher fees. The Guardian, Tuesday 10 May. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/may/10/david-willetts-extra-university-places

  • Wedel, J. (2009). Shadow elite: How the world’s new power brokers undermine democracy, government, and the free market. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, D. (2014). Sell the student loan book – And let the academy buy. Financial Times, 28 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2004). Markets, corporations, consumers? New landscapes in higher education. LATISS Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2005). Machetes into a jungle? A history of anthropology in policy and practice, 1981–2000. In P. Sarah (Ed.), Applications of anthropology (Vol. ASA series, pp. 27–54). Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2008). Governance as a regime of discipline. In D. Noel (Ed.), Exploring regimes of discipline: The dynamics of restraint (EASA series, pp. 75–98). Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2011). Section I: Introduction to studying policy: Methods, paradigms, perspectives. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power (pp. 27–31). Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2014). “Humboldt” Humbug! Contemporary mobilizations of “Humboldt” as a discourse to support the corporatization and marketization of universities and to disparage alternatives’. In T. Karlsohn, P. Josephson, & J. Ostling (Eds.), The humboldtian tradition – Origins and legacies. Brill: Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, S. (2016). The Imaginators of English University Reform. In: Slaughter, S., Taylor, B. (eds) Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21511-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21512-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics