Advertisement

On the Density of Context-Free and Counter Languages

  • Joey Eremondi
  • Oscar H. Ibarra
  • Ian McQuillanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9168)

Abstract

A language L is said to be dense if every word in the universe is an infix of some word in L. This notion has been generalized from the infix operation to arbitrary word operations \(\varrho \) in place of the infix operation (\(\varrho \)-dense, with infix-dense being the standard notion of dense). It is shown here that it is decidable, for a language L accepted by a one-way nondeterministic reversal-bounded pushdown automaton, whether L is infix-dense. However, it becomes undecidable for both deterministic pushdown automata (with no reversal-bound), and for nondeterministic one-counter automata. When examining suffix-density, it is undecidable for more restricted families such as deterministic one-counter automata that make three reversals on the counter, but it is decidable with less reversals. Other decidability results are also presented on dense languages, and contrasted with a marked version called \(\varrho \)-marked-density. Also, new languages are demonstrated to be outside various deterministic language families after applying different deletion operations from smaller families. Lastly, bounded-dense languages are defined and examined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Autebert, J., Berstel, J., Boasson, L.: Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 1, chap. Context-Free Languages and Pushdown Automata. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, B.S., Book, R.V.: Reversal-bounded multipushdown machines. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 8(3), 315–332 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berstel, J., Perrin, D.: Theory of Codes. Academic Press, Orlando (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiniforooshan, E., Daley, M., Ibarra, O.H., Kari, L., Seki, S.: One-reversal counter machines and multihead automata: Revisited. Theoretical Computer Science 454, 81–87 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eremondi, J., Ibarra, O.H., McQuillan, I.: Deletion operations on deterministic families of automata. In: Jain, R., Jain, S., Stephan, F. (eds.) TAMC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9076, pp. 388–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2015) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ginsburg, S.: The Mathematical Theory of Context-Free Languages. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1966) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibarra, O., Yen, H.: On the containment and equivalence problems for two-way transducers. Theoretical Computer Science 429, 155–163 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibarra, O.H.: Reversal-bounded multicounter machines and their decision problems. Journal of the ACM 25(1), 116–133 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito, M.: Dense and disjunctive properties of languages. In: Ésik, Z. (ed.) FCT 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 710, pp. 31–49. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jürgensen, H., Kari, L., Thierrin, G.: Morphisms preserving densities. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 78, 165–189 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minsky, M.L.: Recursive unsolvability of Post’s problem of “tag” and other topics in theory of Turing Machines. Annals of Mathematics 74(3), 437–455 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shyr, H.J.: Free Monoids and Languages, 3rd edn. Hon Min Book Company, Taichung (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joey Eremondi
    • 1
  • Oscar H. Ibarra
    • 2
  • Ian McQuillan
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations