Advertisement

Evaluating the Duplication of Dual-Rail Precharge Logics on FPGAs

  • Alexander WildEmail author
  • Amir Moradi
  • Tim Güneysu
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9064)

Abstract

Power-equalization schemes for digital circuits aim to harden cryptographic designs against power analysis attacks. With respect to dual-rail logics most of these schemes have originally been designed for ASIC platforms, but much efforts have been spent to map them to FPGAs as well. A particular challenge is here to apply those schemes to the predefined logic structures of FPGAs (i.e., slices, LUTs, FFs, and routing switch boxes) for which special tools are required. Due to the absence of such routing tools Yu and Schaumont presented the idea of duplicating (i.e., dualizing) a fully-placed-and-routed dual-rail precharge circuit with equivalent routing structures on an FPGA. They adopted such architecture from WDDL providing the Double WDDL (DWDDL) scheme.

In this work we show that this general technique – regardless of the underlying dual-rail logic – is incapable to properly prevent side-channel leakages. Besides theoretical investigations on this issue we present practical evaluations on a Spartan-6 FPGA to demonstrate the flaws in such an approach. In detail, we consider an AES-128 encryption module realized by three dual-rail precharge logic styles as a case study and show that none of those schemes can provide the desired level of protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partially funded by the European Horizon 2020 project SAFEcrypto (grant no. 644729), German Research Foundation (DFG), and DFG Research Training Group GRK 1817/1.

References

  1. 1.
    Side-channel AttacK User Reference Architecture. http://satoh.cs.uec.ac.jp/SAKURA/index.html
  2. 2.
    Beckhoff, C., Koch, D., Tørresen, J.: The Xilinx Design Language (XDL): tutorial and use cases. In: ReCoSoC 2011, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhasin, S., Guilley, S., Flament, F., Selmane, N., Danger, J.: Countering early evaluation: an approach towards robust dual-rail precharge logic. In: WESS 2010, pp. 6. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilgin, B., Gierlichs, B., Nikova, S., Nikov, V., Rijmen, V.: Higher-order threshold implementations. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8874, pp. 326–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canright, D.: A very compact s-box for AES. In: Rao, J.R., Sunar, B. (eds.) CHES 2005. LNCS, vol. 3659, pp. 441–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Z., Zhou, Y.: Dual-rail random switching logic: a countermeasure to reduce side channel leakage. In: Goubin, L., Matsui, M. (eds.) CHES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4249, pp. 242–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodwill, G., Jun, B., Jaffe, J., Rohatgi, P.: A testing methodology for side-channel resistance validation. In: NIST Non-Invasive Attack Testing Workshop (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, W., de la Torre, E., Riesgo, T.: A precharge-absorbed DPL logic for reducing early propagation effects on FPGA implementations. In: ReConFig 2011, pp. 217–222. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, W., Otero, A., de la Torre, E., Riesgo, T.: Automatic generation of identical routing pairs for FPGA implemented DPL logic. In: ReConFig 2012, pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lavin, C., Padilla, M., Lamprecht, J., Lundrigan, P., Nelson, B., Hutchings, B., Wirthlin, M.: RapidSmith - A Library for Low-level Manipulation of Partially Placed-and-Routed FPGA Designs. Technical report, Brigham Young University, September 2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lomné, V., Maurine, P., Torres, L., Robert, M., Soares, R., Calazans, N.: Evaluation on FPGA of triple rail logic robustness against DPA and DEMA. In: DATE 2009, pp. 634–639. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mangard, S., Oswald, E., Popp, T.: Power Analysis Attacks: Revealing the Secrets of Smart Cards. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moradi, A.: Side-channel leakage through static power. In: Batina, L., Robshaw, M. (eds.) CHES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8731, pp. 562–579. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moradi, A., Eisenbarth, T., Poschmann, A., Paar, C.: Power analysis of single-rail storage elements as used in MDPL. In: Lee, D., Hong, S. (eds.) ICISC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5984, pp. 146–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moradi, A., Immler, V.: Early propagation and imbalanced routing, how to diminish in FPGAs. In: Batina, L., Robshaw, M. (eds.) CHES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8731, pp. 598–615. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nassar, M., Bhasin, S., Danger, J., Duc, G., Guilley, S.: BCDL: a high speed balanced DPL for FPGA with global precharge and no early evaluation. In: DATE 2010, pp. 849–854. IEEE Computer Society (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popp, T., Kirschbaum, M., Zefferer, T., Mangard, S.: Evaluation of the masked logic style MDPL on a prototype chip. In: Paillier, P., Verbauwhede, I. (eds.) CHES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4727, pp. 81–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Popp, T., Mangard, S.: Masked dual-rail pre-charge logic: DPA-resistance without routing constraints. In: Rao, J.R., Sunar, B. (eds.) CHES 2005. LNCS, vol. 3659, pp. 172–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sauvage, L., Nassar, M., Guilley, S., Flament, F., Danger, J., Mathieu, Y.: DPL on stratix II FPGA: what to expect?. In: ReConFig 2009, pp. 243–248. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki, D., Saeki, M.: Security evaluation of DPA countermeasures using dual-rail pre-charge logic style. In: Goubin, L., Matsui, M. (eds.) CHES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4249, pp. 255–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tiri, K., Akmal, M., Verbauwhede, I.: A dynamic and differential CMOS logic with signal independent power consumption to withstand differential power analysis on smart cards. In: ESSCIRC 2002, pp. 403–406 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiri, K., Verbauwhede, I.: A Logic level design methodology for a secure DPA resistant ASIC or FPGA implementation. In: DATE 2004, pp. 246–251. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xilinx: Spartan-6 Libraries Guide for HDL Designs, October 2013Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, P., Schaumont, P.: Secure FPGA circuits using controlled placement and routing. In: CODES+ISSS 2007, pp. 45–50 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horst Gortz Institute for IT-SecurityRuhr-Universitat BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options