Advertisement

Urban Renewal: Negotiation Procedures and Evaluation Models

  • Luci Della Spina
  • Raffaele Scrivo
  • Claudia Ventura
  • Angela Viglianisi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9157)

Abstract

In complex programs of urban redevelopment recourse to negotiation procedures between PA and private developers emphasizes the role of evaluation, both in terms of the collective advantage and from the point of view of financial feasibility. The purpose of the contribution is twofold: the first is to investigate the role that can be exercised by the evaluation in order to confer efficiency, fairness, transparency and democratic participation in the processes of formation and implementation of strategic programs for urban and metropolitan development characterized by high levels of complexity, the second objective is to provide an integrated assessment model which can fulfill this role properly and adequately support the decision-makers and the public in decision-making ex-ante to an integrated assessment of the “public convenience” and at the same time check whether there are sufficient margins of feasibility and financial sustainability for the private developer to carry out the investment program.

Keywords

Integrated evaluation Evaluation models Multicriteria analysis Financial feasibility Strategic programs Urban development Public-private partnership 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aragona, S., et al.: The evaluation culture to build a network of competitive cities in the mediterranean. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. The Integrated Approach of Urban Sustainable Development through the Implementation of Horizon/Europe 2020. Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calabrò, F., et al.: Evaluating cultural routes for a network of competitive cities in the mediterranean sea: the eastern monasticism in western mediterranean area. In: Advanced Materials Research, vols. 1073–1076, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calabrò, F., et al.: Quality Monitoring and Control Tools for the enhancement of the architectural heritage: the Code of Practice for Historic Centres Conservation. WSEAS Press (2015). ISBN: 978-1-61804-259-0Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L.: The public-private partnerships in buildings regeneration: a model appraisal of the benefits and for land value capture. In: Advanced Materials Research, vols. 931–932, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L.: The cultural and environmental resources for sustainable development of rural areas in economically disadvantaged contexts. Economic-appraisals issues of a model of management for the valorisation of public assets. In: Advanced Materials Research, vols. 869–870, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L.: Innovative tools for the effectiveness and efficiency of administrative action of the metropolitan cities: the strategic operational programme. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. The Integrated Approach of Urban Sustainable Development through the Implementation of Horizon/Europe 2020. Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Calabrò, F., et al.: Cultural planning: a model of governance of the landscape and cultural resources in development strategies in rural contexts. In: Proceedings of the XVII - Ipsapa Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference, vol. V (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calavita, N., et al.: Transfer of development rights as incentives for regeneration of illegal settlements. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. The Integrated Approach of Urban Sustainable Development through the Implementation of Horizon/Europe 2020. Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Calavita, N., Mallac, A.: Inclusionary housing, incentives, and land value recapture. In: Land Lines, Lincoln institute of Land Policy (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Alpaos, C., Marella, G.: Urbanistica consensuale e valori d’opzione. In: Valori e valutazioni. n. 12. Dei, Roma (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Della Spina, L., et al.: The culture of evaluation to improve the airport competitiveness of the metropolitan city of the strait: analysis of alternative scenarios of connection. In: Advanced Materials Research, vols. 1065–1069, © Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Della Spina, L.: Procedure di valutazione della qualità abitativa. Gangemi, Roma (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forte, C., De Rossi, B.: Principi di economia ed estimo, ETAS, Milano (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khakee, A., et al. (eds.): New Principles in Planning Evaluation. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., England (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Bare ownership evaluation. Hedonic price model vs. artificial neural network. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 8(4) (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Least Median of Squares regression and Minimum Volume Ellipsoid estimator for outliers detection in housing appraisal. International Journal of business intelligence and data mining 9 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Concession and lease or sale? A model for the enhancement of public properties in disuse or underutilized. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics 11 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munda, G.: Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nesticò, A., De Mare, G.: Government tools for urban regeneration: the cities plan in italy. A critical analysis of the results and the proposed alternative. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part II, LNCS, vol. 8580. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nesticò, A., De Mare, G.: Efficiency analysis for sustainable mobility. The design of a mechanical vector in Amalfi Coast (Italy). In: Advanced Materials Research, vols. 931–932. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nesticò, A., De Mare, G., Fiore, P., Pipolo, O.: A model for the economic evaluation of energetic requalification projects in buildings. A real case application. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2014, Part II, LNCS, vol. 8580. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prizzon, F.: Gli investimenti immobiliari. Analisi di mercato e valutazione economica finanziaria degli interventi. Celid, Torino (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nijkamp, P., Delft, A.: Multicriteria Analysis and Regional Decision Making. Springer, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roy, B.: Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la decision. In: Economica-Collection Gestion, Parigi (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sen, A.K.: The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy (78) (1970)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Delft, A., Nijkamp, P.: Multi-criteria analysis and regional decision-making. In: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division, Leiden (1977)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Voogd, H.: Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luci Della Spina
    • 1
  • Raffaele Scrivo
    • 1
  • Claudia Ventura
    • 1
  • Angela Viglianisi
    • 1
  1. 1.Mediterranea University of Reggio CalabriaReggio CalabriaItaly

Personalised recommendations