ICCSA 2015: Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2015 pp 257-272 | Cite as
Modeling Socially Synergistic Behavior in Autonomous Agents
Abstract
The “Tragedy of the Commons” (TOC) is a problem in which the sustainability of the society (group of agents) reduces due to self-interested individual agents. Many areas of interest to society like climate change, fisheries management, preservation of rainforests exhibit this phenomenon. We have focused on understanding what is the degree of sacrifice that an agent can make so that the sustainability of the society can be extended. For this we first make a mathematical modeling of the TOC dilemma. Next we propose three types of algorithms corresponding to the different behaviors of the agents. First we assume that the agents are interested in their individual gains only. In this case the society survives for the least amount of time. In the second approach we assume that the agents make decisions based on the resource availability, individual gains or a combination of both. Here an agent’s behavior takes into account the welfare of the society to some extent. Thus now the society survives for a longer period of time compared to that in the previous case. In the third approach we define a measure of social awareness of the agents. This measure is indicative of the degree of sacrifice the agent is willing to make. Now the society performs considerably better than the second case. We have experimentally validated these results. Our study shows that if the agents are willing to sacrifice for some period of time, the sustainability of the society increases considerably.
Keywords
Public Good Shared Resource Autonomous Agent Aspiration Level Increment RatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Sen, O., Sen, S.: Averting the tragedy of commons by adaptive aspiration levels. In: PRIMA, pp 355–370 (2010)Google Scholar
- 2.Saha, S., Sen, S.: Local decisions procedures for avoiding the tragedy of commons. In: Das, S.R., Das, S.K. (eds.) IWDC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2918, pp. 311–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hardin, G.: The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(3859), 1243–1248 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Turner, R.M.: The tragedy of the commons and distributed AI systems. In: 12th International Workshop on Distributed AI, pp. 379–390 (1993)Google Scholar
- 5.Hogg, L.M.J., Jennings, N.R.: Socially Intelligent Reasoning for Autonomous Agents. IEEE Trans. SMC(A) 31(5), 381–393 (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Lopez, L., Almansa, G.D.R., Paquelet, S., Fernandez, A.: A mathematical model for the TCP Tragedy of the Commons. Theoretical Computer Science 343(1–2) (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Diekert, F.K.: The tragedy of the commons from a game-theoretic perspective. Sustainability 4, 1776–1786 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Killingback, T., Doebeli, M., Hauert, C.: Diversity of cooperation in the Tragedy of Commons. Biological Theory 5, 3–6 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Doebeli, M., Hauert, C.: Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner’s dilemma and the snowdrift game. Ecology Letters 8, 748–766 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Castelfranchi, C.: Modeling social action of AI agents. Artificial Intelligence 103(1–2) (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Milinsky, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.-J.: Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Letters to Nature, Nature 415, 424–426 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Smith, B.: The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. Doubleday, New York (1994)Google Scholar
- 13.Braun, W.: The System Archetypes (2002)Google Scholar
- 14.Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modelling (CCL). Northwestern University, USA. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
- 15.
- 16.MadKIT. http://www.madkit.org/
- 17.Pseudo-random numbers. http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/random/