International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

HCI 2015: HCI International 2015 - Posters’ Extended Abstracts pp 117-122 | Cite as

Examining the Gender Gap in Information Assurance: A Study of Psychological Factors

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 528)

Abstract

The increasing cyber attacks result in an emergent need for Information Assurance professionals in the government and private sector. Young adults’ psychological factors related to the career field of Information Assurance (IA) remain largely understudied despite Information Assurance Workforce (IAW) becoming a crucial issue. Gender disparity, in particular, is a concern for Information Assurance. The first of its kind, this study investigates the gender gap in the field of IA by examining psychological factors affecting young adults, including attitudes, interests, self-efficacy, and goals. Our findings on gender difference in IA from psychological perspectives provide insight for understanding gender disparity in the IA field and initiate studies to explore this issue further. The practical purpose of this study is to contribute information related to gender differences, understood with regard to psychological aspects, for IA recruitment strategies to inspire young adults, especially the underrepresented population of women, to join the IAW.

Keywords

Information assurance workforce Gender disparity Career choice Vocational psychology Cyber security education 

References

  1. 1.
    Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P. (eds.): The Handbook of Attitudes. Psychology Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Libicki, M., Senty, D., Pollak, J.: An examination of the cybersecurity labor market. National Security Research Division. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR400/RR430/RAND_RR430.pdf (2014). Accessed 07 Nov 2014
  3. 3.
    Busch, T.: Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 12(2), 147–158 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markman, G.D., Balkin, D.B., Baron, R.A.: Inventors and new venture formation: the effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theor. Pract. 27(2), 149–165 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D.: Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship Education1. Entrepreneurship Theor. Pract. 31(3), 387–406 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper, J.: The digital divide: the special case of gender. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 22(5), 320–334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nye, C.D., Su, R., Rounds, J., Drasgow, F.: Vocational interests and performance a quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7(4), 384–403 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weisgram, E.S., Bigler, R.S.: Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychol. Women Q. 31(3), 262–269 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diekman, A.B., Clark, E.K., Johnston, A.M., Brown, E.R., Steinberg, M.: Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: evidence for a goal congruity perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101(5), 902 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diekman, A.B., Steinberg, M.: Navigating social roles in pursuit of important goals: a communal goal congruity account of STEM pursuits. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 7(7), 487–501 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eccles-Parsons, J.: Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In: Spence, J.T. (ed.) Achievement and Achievement Motivations, pp. 75–121. Freeman, San Francisco (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eccles, J.S.: Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychol. Women Q. 18(4), 585–609 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eccles, J.S.: Where Are All the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P. (eds.) The Handbook of Attitudes, pp. 173–221. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarrett, N., Malanchuk, O., Davis-Kean, P.E., Eccles, J.: Examining the gender gap in IT by race: young adults’ decisions to pursue an IT career. In: Cohoon, J.M., Aspray, W. (eds.) Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation, pp. 55–88. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hackett, G., Betz, N.E.: Self-efficacy and career choice and development. In: Maddux, J.E. (ed.) Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment, pp. 249–280. Springer, Berlin (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagemeyer, B., Neyer, F.J.: Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: the partner-related agency and communion test (PACT). Psychol. Assess. 24(1), 114 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Konrad, A.M., Ritchie Jr., J.E., Lieb, P., Corrigall, E.: Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 126(4), 593 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurtz-Costes, B., Rowley, S.J., Harris-Britt, A., Woods, T.A.: Gender stereotypes about mathematics and science and self-perceptions of ability in late childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Q. 54(3), 386–409 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    LeClair, J., Shih, L., Abraham, S.: Women in STEM and cyber security fields. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, Savannah, Georgia, 5–7 Feb 2014Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lips, H.M.: Gender and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students’ academic choices. J. Vocat. Behav. 40(1), 62–81 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois Informatics InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations