Governing Beyond Cities: The Urban-Rural Interface

Abstract

If 70 % of the global population will reside in metropolitan regions by 2050, this poses new governance challenges related to urban-rural interfaces and linkages. It calls for governance that stretches across scales and beyond urban boundaries, taking into account both problems and opportunities of urbanization. This chapter reviews the literature on urban-rural interfaces and linkages and discusses suggestions for dealing with them. It also addresses three governance problems that hinder a more integrated approach towards the urban-rural interface, specifically fragmentation, institutional inertia, and the inability to realize inclusive development. Based on potential governance approaches to address these three problems, we present six institutional design dimensions for a more inclusive governance approach for urban-rural regions. Bridging organizations, nested issue-based platforms, and combining governance with strong government are identified as pathways towards inclusive urban-rural governance.

Keywords

Urban-rural linkages Peri-urban fringe Urban-rural regions Institutional design dimensions Inclusive urban-rural governance 

References

  1. Afridi F, Xin Lin S, Ren Y (2012) Social identity and inequality. The impact of China’s hukou system, IZA DP 6417, BonnGoogle Scholar
  2. Akinyoade A, Klaver W, Soeters S, Foecken D (2014) Digging deeper: inside Africa’s agricultural, food and nutrition dynamics. Brill Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen A (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban 1:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baud I, Pfeffer K, Scott D, Denis E, Sydenstricker-Neto J (2014) Participatory ‘spatial’ knowledge management configurations in metropolitan governance networks for SD. Thematic report, WP5. Chance2Sustain EADI, Bonn. Available via http://www.chance2sustain.eu/82.0.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  5. Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12):2021–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bélières J-F, Bosc P-M, Faure G, Fournier S, Losch B (2002) What future for West Africa’s family farms in a world market economy? Issue Paper 113. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell D (2006) Variations on the rural idyll. In: Cloke P, Marsden D, Mooney MH (eds) Handbook of rural studies. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, pp 149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 5:1692–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertolini L (2010) Complex systems, evolutionary planning? In: Roo G, Silva EA (eds) A planner’s encounter with complexity. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  10. Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, Bäckstrand K, Bernstein S, Betsill MM, Bulkeley H, … Zondervan R (2012) Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):51–60Google Scholar
  11. Billen G, Garnier J, Barles S (2012) History of the urban environmental imprint: introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the long-term relationships between Western cities and their hinterland. Reg Environ Change 2:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brookfield H (2008) Family farms are still around: time to invert the old agrarian question. Geogr Compass 2(1):108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulkeley H, Betsill M (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environ Polit 1:42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bunce M (1998) Thirty years of farmland preservation in North America: discourses and ideologies of a movement. J Rural Stud 2:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burger K, Zaal F (eds) (2009) Sustainable land management in the tropics: explaining the miracle. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  16. Cash C (2014) Towards achieving resilience at the rural–urban fringe: the case of Jamestown, South Africa. Urban Forum 25(1):125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8Google Scholar
  18. Castells M (2010) The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society, and culture, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Cobbinah PB, Amoako C (2012) Urban sprawl and the loss of peri-urban land in Kumasi, Ghana. Int J Soc Hum Sci 6:388–397Google Scholar
  20. Commons Wikimedia (2015a) Feldkirchen im Kanten. Available via http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Feldkirchen_in_Kärnten, Accessed 21 Mar 2015
  21. Commons Wikimedia (2015b) Urban agriculture. Available via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_agriculture Accessed 21 Mar 2015
  22. Commons Wikimedia (2015c) A view of Delhi. Available via http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_view_of_Delhi.jpg/ Accessed 21 Mar 2015
  23. Commons Wikimedia (2015d) Thimphu urbanization. Available via http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ThimphuUrbanization2010.jpg. Accessed 21 Mar 2015
  24. Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Hallegatte S, Teasdale PJ (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104(1):169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davelaar EJ, Nijkamp P (1989) The role of the metropolitan milieu as an incubation centre for technological innovations: a Dutch case study. Urban Stud 5:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Day JW, Moerschbaecher M, Pimentel D, Hall C, Yáñez-Arancibia A (2014) Sustainability and place: how emerging mega-trends of the 21st century will affect humans and nature at the landscape level. Ecol Eng 65:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Bruijn M, van Dijk RA, Foeken D (eds) (2001) Mobile Africa: changing patterns of movement in Africa and beyond, vol 1. Brill Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  28. Douglass M (1998) A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural–urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Plan Rev 1:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Du S, Shi P, van Rompaey A (2013) The relationship between urban sprawl and farmland displacement in the Pearl River Delta, China. Land 3(1):34–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dwyer JF, Childs GM (2004) Movement of people across the landscape: a blurring of distinctions between areas, interests, and issues affecting natural resource management. Landsc Urb Plan 2:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Evers D, de Vries J (2013) Explaining governance in five mega-city regions: rethinking the role of hierarchy and government. Eur Plan Stud 4:536–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I (2012) Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? J Peasant Stud 2:237–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. FAO (2011) Food, agriculture and cities. Challenges of food and nutrition security, agriculture and ecosystem management in an urbanizing world. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  34. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forster T, Escudero AG (2014) City regions as landscapes for people, food and nature. EcoAgriculture Partners, on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM (2006) Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 117(2):417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol 1:1–24Google Scholar
  38. Greiner C, Sakdapolrak P (2013) Rural–urban migration, agrarian change, and the environment in Kenya: a critical review of the literature. Popul Environ 34(4):524–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gupta J, Bavinck M (2014) Towards an elaborated theory of legal pluralism and aquatic resources. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 11:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gupta J, Pouw NRM, Ros-Tonen MAF (2015) Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. Eur J Dev Res (in press)Google Scholar
  41. Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol 4:573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hajer M (2014) On being smart about cities. Seven considerations for a new urban planning & design. In: Hajer M, Dassen T (eds) Smart about cities. Visualising the challenge for 21st century urbanism. Nai010 Publishers, Rotterdam and PBL, The Hague, pp 11–43Google Scholar
  43. Harrison J, Heley J (2014) Governing beyond the metropolis: placing the rural in city-region development. Urb Stud [online before print] doi: 10.1177/004209801453285
  44. Hazell PB (2005) Is there a future for small farms? Agric Econ 32(s1):93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Howley P (2011) Landscape aesthetics: assessing the general publics’ preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecol Econ 62:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (2013) Bonn declaration of mayors. Result of the 4th Global Forum on Urban Resilience held on 31 May – 2 June 2013 in Bonn, Germany. Available via http://resilient-cities.iclei.org/fileadmin/sites/resilient-cities/files/Resilient_Cities_2013/MAF_2013_Bonn_Declaration_of_Mayors.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  48. Kelly PF (2011) Migration, agrarian transition, and rural change in southeast Asia: introduction. Crit Asian Stud 4:479–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kingston C, Caballero G (2009) Comparing theories of institutional change. J Inst Econ 5:151–180Google Scholar
  50. Kooiman J, Bavinck JM (2013) Theorizing governability – the interactive governance perspective. In: Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture. Theory and applications, MARE Publication series no 7. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kooiman J, Jentoft S (2009) Meta-governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Adm 4:818–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Landscapes for People, Food and Nature (2015) A healthy world starts with whole landscapes. Available via http://peoplefoodandnature.org/. Accessed 27 Mar 2015
  53. Lerner AM, Eakin H (2011) An obsolete dichotomy? Rethinking the rural–urban interface in terms of food security and production in the global south. Geogr J 4:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leys AJ, Vanclay JK (2011) Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy 3:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lopez SL (2015) The remittance landscape: spaces of migration in rural Mexico and urban USA. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Lu D (2002) Rural–urban income disparity: impact of growth, allocative efficiency, and local growth welfare. China Econ Rev 13(4):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Martellozzo F, Ramankutty N, Hall RJ, Price DT, Purdy B, Friedl MA (2014) Urbanization and the loss of prime farmland: a case study in the Calgary–Edmonton corridor of Alberta. Reg Environ Change:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10113–014-0658-0
  58. Mazzucato V (2011) Reverse remittances in the migration–development nexus: two-way flows between Ghana and the Netherlands. Popul Space Place 5:454–468Google Scholar
  59. McGranahan G (2007) Urban transitions and the spatial displacement of environmental burdens. In: Marcotullio PJ, McGranahan G (eds) Scaling urban environmental challenges from local to global and back. Earthscan with UNU-IAS and IIED, London, pp 18–44Google Scholar
  60. McGranahan G, Satterthwaite D, Tacoli C (2001) Urban environmental improvement and poverty reduction. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. McGregor JA (2007) Researching wellbeing: from concepts to methodology. In: Gough I, McGregor JA (eds) Wellbeing in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316–350Google Scholar
  62. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Miranda Sara L, Baud I (2014) Knowledge-building in adaptation management: concertación processes in transforming Lima water and climate change governance. Environ Urban 26(2):505–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mortimore M (2003) The future of family farms in West Africa: what can we learn from long-term data? Issue paper 119. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  65. Mukherjee M (2006) Waste-fed fisheries in peri-urban Kolkata. In: McGregor D, Simon D, Thomson D (eds) The peri-urban interface. Approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (2013a) Introduction. In: Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (eds) Peri-urban futures: scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (eds) (2013b) Peri-urban futures: scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Nilsson K, Nielsen TAS, Aalbers C, Bell S, Boitier B, Chery JP, Fertner C et al. (2014) Strategies for sustainable urban development and urban-rural linkages. Research briefings EJSD. Available via http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Researchbriefings/article4.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  69. OECD (2011) Divided we stand. Why inequality keeps rising. Available via http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/49170475.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  70. OECD (2012a) Environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction. Available via http://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/oecdenvironmentaloutlookto2050theconsequencesofinaction.htm Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  71. OECD (2012b) Promoting growth in all regions. OECD Publishing, Paris. Available via http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264174634-en. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  72. Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11:1Google Scholar
  73. Osofsky H, Peel J (2013) Divergent responses to climate change in a multipolar world. Proc Am Soc Int Law 107:73–75Google Scholar
  74. Phillips D, Williams K, Andrews G, Clarke J, Carter M, Kinsman P, Smith D et al (1999) Literature review on peri-urban conceptualisation and management approaches. Final Technical Report for project R6949. School of Geography, University of Nottingham, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  75. Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pouw NRM, McGregor AJ (2014) An economics of wellbeing. How would economics look like if it focussed on human wellbeing? IDS Working Paper Series no 496, University of Sussex/IDS, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  77. Præstholm S, Kristensen SP (2007) Farmers as initiators and farms as attractors for non-agricultural economic activities in peri-urban areas in Denmark. Geogr Tidsskr 2:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 5652:1912–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rauws WS, de Roo G (2011) Exploring transitions in the peri-urban area. Plan Theory Pract 12:269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ravetz J (2000) City region 2020: integrated planning for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  82. Ravetz J, Fertner C, Nielsen TS (2013) The dynamics of peri-urbanization. In: Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (eds) Peri-urban futures: scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg /New York /Dordrecht /London, pp 13–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. EIA Rev 16:223–248Google Scholar
  84. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 7263:472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F (2002) Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Kennedy School of Government Working Paper. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ros-Tonen MAF, Derky M, Insaidoo TFG (2014) From co-management to adaptive landscape governance: whither the modified taungya system? Forests 5:2996–3021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M et al (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 21:8349–8356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scherr SJ, McNeely JA (2008) Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’ landscapes. Philos Trans R Soc B 1491:477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schneider A, Woodcock CE (2008) Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud 3:659–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Scott A, Gilbert A, Gelan A (2007) The urban-rural divide: myth or reality? Policy brief no 2, Socio-Economic Research Group (SERG). Available via http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/economics/research/SERPpb2.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2015
  91. Scott AJ, Carter C, Reed MR, Larkham P, Adams D, Morton N, Waters R et al (2013) Disintegrated development at the rural–urban fringe: re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. Prog Plan 83:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Seitzinger SP, Svedin U, Crumley CL, Steffen W, Abdullah SA, Alfsen C, Broadgate WJ et al (2012) Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: beyond city limits. Ambio 8:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Simon D (2008) Urban environments: issues on the peri-urban fringe. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Simon D, McGregor D, Nsiah-Gyabaah K (2004) The changing urban-rural interface of African cities: definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environ Urban 2:235–248Google Scholar
  95. Squires GD (ed) (2002) Urban sprawl: causes, consequences, and policy responses. The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  96. Swilling M, Annecke E (2012) Just transitions: explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. UCT Press, Cape Town and UNU, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  97. Tacoli C (1998) Rural-urban interactions: a guide to the literature. Environ Urban 1:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Theobald DM (2001) Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr Rev 3:544–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Torfing J, Peters BG, Pierre J, Sørensen E (2012) Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. UN Habitat (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/2013. Prosperity of cities. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. UNEP (2013) City-level decoupling. Urban resource flows and the governance of infrastructure transitions. A report of the Working Group on Cities of the International Resource Panel. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  102. Villarroel Walker R, Beck MB, Hall JW, Dawson RJ, Heidrich O (2014) The energy-water-food nexus: strategic analysis of technologies for transforming the urban metabolism. J Environ Manag 141:104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Von Thünen JH (1875) (based on 1826–1863) Der isoli[e]rte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, 3. Aufl. hrsg. von Hermann Schumacher-Zarchlin. Wiegand, Hempel & Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  104. Westerink J, Aalbers C (2013) The Hague region: negotiating the common ground in peri-urban landscapes. In: Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (eds) Peri-urban futures: scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/ London, pp 99–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Whyte MK (2010) One country, two societies: rural-urban inequality in contemporary China. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  106. Wolman A (1965) The metabolism of cities. Sci Am 3:179–190Google Scholar
  107. Yeo RK (2005) Revisiting the roots of learning organization. Learn Organ 12(4):368–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Young OR (2010) Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob Environ Change 20(3):378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zaal F, Dietz T (1998) The provisioning of African cities, with Ouagadougou as a case study. In: Baud ISA, Post J (eds) Re-aligning actors in an urbanizing world: institutions and governance in an international perspective. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 263–284Google Scholar
  110. Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 4:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zasada I, Loibl W, Berges R, Steinnocher K, Köstl M, Piorr A, Werner A (2013) Rural–urban regions: a spatial approach to define urban–rural relationships in Europe. In: Nilsson K, Pauleit S, Bell S, Aalbers C, Nielsen TS (eds) Peri-urban futures: scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zoomers A (2010) Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. J Peasant Stud 37(2):429–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Geography, Planning and International Development StudiesAmsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations