Advertisement

“…if the Universe Is Beautiful, We’re Part of that Beauty.”—A “Neither Religious nor Spiritual” Biography as Horizontal Transcendence

  • Thomas J. Coleman IIIEmail author
  • Christopher F. Silver
  • Ralph W. HoodJr.
Chapter

Abstract

27-year-old Isabella grew up with her parents on the Eastern Coast of the United Sates. She describes her life as “pretty boring” and “normal.” However ‘boring’ and ‘normal’ her life may have appeared to her, it is the worldview that Isabella takes—and has always had by her count—that draws great interest. Typically, many individuals who currently identify as an ‘atheist ’ also used to identify as ‘religious’ in their youth (Silver, 2013). Isabella stands out in this regard, she has never believed in a god or gods. What Coleman, Silver, and Holcombe (2013) have termed as “religio-spiritual frameworks” played no part in Isabella’s worldview. As this chapter shall demonstrate, Isabella was able to ask questions about life, make sense of her environment, and find meaning and purpose not in the confines of a religious or spiritual worldview, but, in a worldview that retained a similar sense of awe, wonder and meaning in the absence of any spiritual or religious structure—a worldview we term as ‘horizontal transcendence .’ This chapter will situate the role of the Faith Development Interview in the context of the ‘faithless ’ while drawing attention to the role of narrative in horizontal transcendence .

Keywords

Atheism Horizontal transcendence Nonbelief Absorption 

References

  1. Altınlı-Macić, M., & Coleman III, T. J. (2015). Spirituality and Religion: An Empirical Study Using a Turkish Muslim Sample. In Z. Agilkaya-Sahin, H. Streib, A. Ayten, & R. Hood (Eds.), Psychology of Religion in Turkey (pp. 161–176). Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004290884_008
  2. Beaman, L. (2013). The will to religion: Obligatory religious citizenship. Critical Research on Religion, 1(2), 141–157. doi: 10.1177/2050303213490040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blessing, K. (2013). Atheism and the meaningfulness of life. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 104–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2000). The Life Story Schema. Motivation And Emotion, 24(2), 121–147. doi: 10.1023/a:1005615331901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bradley, D. F., Exline, J. J., & Uzdavines, A. (2015). The God of nonbelievers: Characteristics of a hypothetical god [Special issue]. Science, Religion & Culture, 2(3).Google Scholar
  8. Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman III, T. J. (2013). The secular reality: A response to Pratt’s “Durkheimian Dread.” In The religious studies project podcast series. Online at http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/2013/02/06/the-secular-reality-by-thomas-j-coleman-iii/
  10. Coleman III, T. J. (2014). Review of Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Secularism & Nonreligion, 3(2). doi: 10.5334/snr.an
  11. Coleman III, T. J., & Arrowood, R. B. (2015). Only We Can Save Ourselves: An atheists ‘salvation’. In H. Bacon, W. Dossett, & S. Knowles (Eds.), Alternative Salvations: Engaging the Sacred and the Secular (pp. 11–20). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman III, T. J., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2015). Reconsidering everything: From folk categories to existential theory of mind [Peer commentary on the paper “From Weird Experiences to Revelatory Events” by A. Taves]. Religion and Society: Advances in Research, 6(1), 18–22.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman III, T. J., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Shook, J. R., (2015). An introduction to atheism, secularity, and science [Special issue]. Science, Religion & Culture 2(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Coleman III, T. J., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Silver, C. F. (2013, August 30) Horizontal and vertical transcendence: A theory, the paradigm, and research. Paper presented at the 2013 International Association for the Psychology of Religion congress in Lausanne, Switzerland. http://www3.unil.ch/wpmu/iapr2013/files/2012/03/AbstractBook4.pdf
  15. Coleman III, T. J., Silver, C. F., & Holcombe, J. (2013). Focusing on horizontal transcendence: Much more than a “non-belief.” Essays in the Philosophy Of Humanism, 21(2), 1–18. doi: 10.1558/eph.v21i2.1
  16. Cotter, C. (2011). Consciousness raising: The critique, agenda, and inherent precariousness of contemporary anglophone atheism. International Journal for the Study of New Religions, 2(1), 77–103. doi: 10.1558/ijsnr.v2i1.77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ecklund, E., & Scheitle, C. (2007). Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics. Social Problems, 54, 289–307. doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.2.289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. D. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 380–398). New York, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Feyerabend, P. (1999). Conquest of abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of faith. San Francisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Fowler, J., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research. Bielefeld: Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion.Google Scholar
  22. Frankl, V. (1988). The will to meaning. New York, N.Y.: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Gervais, W., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336(6080), 493–496. doi: 10.1126/science.1215647 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hood, R. W. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29–41. doi: 10.2307/1384454
  26. Hood, R. W. (2012). Methodological agnosticism for the socials sciences? Lessons from Sorokin’s and James’s allusions to psychoanalysis, mysticism, and godly love. In M. Lee & A. Young (Eds.) (2012), The science and theology of godly love (pp. 121–140). Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hood, R. W., Hill, P., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Keller, B., & Streib, H. (2013). Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal for Empirical Theology, 26(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1163/15709256-12341255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kohls, N., & Walach, H. (2006). Exceptional experiences and spiritual practice: A new measurement approach. Spirituality and Health International, 7(3), 125–150. doi: 10.1002/shi.296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In I. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  31. Luhrmann, T. (2012). When god talks back. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  32. Luhrmann, T. (2013). Building on William James: The role of learning in religious experience. In D. Xygalatas & W. McCorkle, Jr. (Eds.), Mental culture: Classical social theory and the cognitive science of religion (pp. 145–163). Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  33. Mann, M. (2013). Triangle atheists: Stigma, identity, and community among atheists in North Carolina’s triangle region (Master’s thesis, Duke University). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10161/8275
  34. McAdams, D. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In J. Oliver, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 242–262). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCutcheon, R. (1997). Manufacturing religion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Norenzayan, A., Gervais, W. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036880 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Roche, S., & McConkey, K. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91–101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  40. Schnell, T., & Keenan, W. (2011). Meaning-making in an atheist world. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33(1), 55–78. doi: 10.1163/157361211x564611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shook, J. (2014). Scientific atheology. Science Religion and Culture, 1(1), 32–48.Google Scholar
  42. Silver, C. F. (2013). Atheism, agnosticism, and nonbelief: A qualitative and quantitative study of type and narrative (Order No. 3592627). Available from Dissertations & Theses @ University of Tennessee - Chattanooga; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A & I. (1437233564). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1437233564?accountid=14767
  43. Silver, C. F., Coleman III, T. J., Hood, R. W. Jr., & Holcombe, J. M. (2014). The six types of nonbelief: A qualitative and quantitative study of type and narrative. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17, 990–1001. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2014.987743
  44. Singer, J., & Salovey, P. (1993). The remembered self. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Streib, H. (2001). Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(3), 143–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr1103_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Streib, H., & Hood, R. (2013). Modeling the religious field: Religion, spirituality, mysticism and related world views. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 137–155. doi: 10.1558/imre.v16i2.133 Google Scholar
  47. Streib, H., Hood, R., Keller, B., Csöff, R., & Silver, C. (2009). Deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Research in Contemporary Religion (Vol. 5). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  48. Taves, A. (2009). Religious experience reconsidered. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Taves, A. (2013). Building blocks of sacralities. In R. Paloutzian & C. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 138–161). New York, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Vergote, A. (1986). Two opposed viewpoints concerning the object of the psychology of religion. In Third International Conference for European Psychologists of Religion (pp. 67–75). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  51. Vergote, A. (1997). Religion, belief and unbelief. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wielenberg, E. (2013). Atheism and morality. In S. Bullivant & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 89–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Xygalatas, D. (2012). The burning saints. Bristol, CT: Equinox.Google Scholar
  54. Xygalatas, D., & McCorkle, W. (2013). Mental culture: Classical social theory and the cognitive science of religion. Durham [England]: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Zinnbauer, B., Pargament, K., Cole, B., Rye, M., Butter, E., Belavich, T., … (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 549–564. doi: 10.2307/1387689

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Coleman III
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christopher F. Silver
    • 1
  • Ralph W. HoodJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations