Advertisement

Family of Related Systemic Elements (FoRSE™) Matrix: Big(ger) Picture Thinking and Application for Business and Organizations

  • Blane DesprésEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

We can best pursue problem framing and solutions by understanding their relationship to the organization’s purposes. Part of the process of problem framing involves distinguishing between problems and symptoms. In this chapter I present big(ger) picture thinking as a best fitting framework via the FoRSE™ Matrix system, and clarify big(ger) picture thinking and little window glimpses. Four types of thinking add to the complexity. The main outcome of big(ger) picture thinking is the best understanding of the organization, its purpose and direction, and the ripple effects of its queries and decision-making as these all relate to being. Benefits include a practical model for leaders to understand the complexity and ripple effects of their in/decisions, to have a comprehensive schema of the critical parts, or system elements, of their problems or questions, and greatly improved, sustainable directions.

Keywords

Problem framing System Complexity Goals Big picture Intervention 

References

  1. Bailin S, Case R, Coombs J, Daniels L (1999a) Common misconceptions of critical thinking. J Curric Stud 31(3):269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailin S, Case R, Coombs J, Daniels L (1999b) Conceptualizing critical thinking. J Curric Stud 31(3):285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Després B (ed) (2008a) Systems thinkers in action: A field guide for effective change leadership in education. Leading systemic school improvement series. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Lanham (Series Editor: Duffy FMGoogle Scholar
  4. Després B (2008b) Conclusions and continued beginnings: application of the systemic factors inventory analysis matrix. In Després B (ed) Systems thinkers in action: a field guide for effective change leadership in education. Leading systemic school improvement series. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Lanham, pp. 247–267 (Series Editor: Duffy FM)Google Scholar
  5. Després B (2008c) Tease of the perfect university: mis/matching systemic elements and their effect on organizational dynamics. Syst Prac Action Res 21(3):197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Després B (2012) FoRSE matrix: big(ger) picture key to sustainable success. In: Workshop presentation at the 2012 Pegasus conference, systems thinking in action: the power is in the connections. Indianapolis, 12–14 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  7. Després B (2014) Systemic thinking: a walk. In: Keynote presentation at the systems thinkers in action Temenos conference, Seattle, 16–18 Apr 2014Google Scholar
  8. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ripple Deep ConsultingKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations