Exploring the Workings of the Psyche: Metatheoretical and Methodological Foundations

Chapter
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 13)

Abstract

Introspection is considered a key method for exploring the workings of the psyche because psychical phenomena are accessible only by the individual him or herself. But this epistemological concept, despite its importance, remained unclear and contentious. Its scientificity is often questioned, but still introspective findings from psychophysics are widely accepted as the ultimate proof of the quantifiability of psychical phenomena. Not everything going on in individuals’ minds is considered introspection, but clear criteria that qualify explorations as introspective are still missing. This research applies the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals (TPS-Paradigm) to metatheoretically define the peculiarities of psychical phenomena of which various kinds are differentiated and to derive therefrom basic methodological principles and criteria applicable to any investigation. Building on these foundations, the TPS-Paradigm introduces the concepts of introquestion versus extroquestion and reveals that introspection cannot be clearly differentiated from extrospection and that psychophysical experiments and some first-person perspective methods are not introspective as often assumed. The chapter explores the challenges that arise from the fact that psychical phenomena can be explored only indirectly through individuals’ behavioural and semiotic externalisations and scrutinises what, when, where and how to externalise in introquestive explorations. The basic principles and criteria elaborated also allow for determining which kind of psychical phenomenon can be explored by using which kind of method for establishing an appropriate phenomenon–methodology match.

Keywords

Introspection–extrospection First-person perspective methods Psychophysics Introquestion–extroquestion Quantification in psychology/ Quantitative psychology 

References

  1. Adams, D. K. & Zener, K. E. (1935). Translators’ preface. In K. Lewin (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. Selected papers. New York and London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bohr, N. (1937). Causality and complementarity. Philosophy and Science, 4, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 169–189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bower, G. H. (1967). A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. The psychology of learning and motivation. Advances in Research and Theory, 1, 229–325.Google Scholar
  5. Brentano, F. C. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  6. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bühler, K. (1907). Tatsachen und Probleme zu einer Psychologie der Denkvorgänge I. Über Gedanken. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 9, 297–365.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (2013). Rethinking introspection. A pluralist approach to the first-person perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collingwood, R. G. (1940). An essay on metaphysics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Diriwächter, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2008). Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical syntheses. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Eich, E., & Metcalfe, J. (1989). Mood dependent memory for internal versus external events. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahrenberg, J. (2013). Zur Kategorienlehre der Psychologie Komplementaritätsprinzip. Perspektiven und Perspektiven-Wechsel. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Fechner, G. Th. (1888). Ueber die psychischen Maßprincipien und das Webersche Gesetz. Philosophische Studien, 4, 161–230.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
  16. Flick, U. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (1915). The unconscious. Standard Edition, 14, 159–214.Google Scholar
  18. Gibson, J. J. (1967). New reasons for realism. Synthese, 17, 162–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Studying the movement of thought. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray (pp. 69–88). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Hacker, W. (1886). Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Stuttgart und Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  21. Harman, G. (1990). The intrinsic quality of experience. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives (Vol. 4, pp. 31–52). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
  22. Hintzman, D. L., & Block, R. A. (1971). Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple trace hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirschberger, J. (1980a). Geschichte der Philosophie. Band I Altertum und Mittelalter. Zweitausendeins: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschberger, J. (1980b). Geschichte der Philosophie Band II Neuzeit und Gegenwart. Zweitausendeins: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  25. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kant, I. (1781/1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Hrsg. J. Timmermann). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Kant, I. (1786/1968). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (Hrsg. B. Erdmann, P. Menzer, & A. Höfler). Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Textausgabe Band IV (pp. 465–565). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Kant, I. (1798/2000). Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (Hrsg. R. Brandt). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 and 2). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lahlou, S. (2011). How can we capture the subject’s perspective?: An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50, 607–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lahlou, S., Le Bellu, S. & Boesen-Mariani, S. (2015). Subjective evidence-based ethnography: Method and applications. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 216–238.Google Scholar
  34. Lau, J. & Deutsch, M. (2014). Externalism about mental content. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/content-externalism; retrieved Feb, 15, 2015.
  35. Le Poidevin, R. (2011). The experience and perception of time. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/time-experience/; retrieved Apr, 15, 2014.
  36. Locke, J., (1689). Essay concerning human understanding. Book I. The Project Gutenberg EBook #10615. http://www.gutenberg.org; retrieved Sept, 08, 2013.
  37. McAdams, D. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1991). The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications. Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millikan, R. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Bradford: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peirce, C. S. (1902). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (eds.), vols. 7–8, A. W. Burks (ed.), (1931–1935/1958–1966). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pink, S. (2015). Going forward through the world: Thinking theoretically about first person perspective digital ethnography. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 239–252.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenbaum, P. J., & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory and Psychology, 21, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roth, W.-M. (2012). First person methods: Towards an empirical phenomenology of experience. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothschuh, K. E. (1963). Theorie des Organsimus. Bios—Psyche—Pathos (2. erw. Aufl.). München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  47. Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. Acumen: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). Constructive memory: Ghosts of past and future. Nature, 445, 27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). Introspection. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), E. N. Zalta (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/introspection; retrieved Jan, 31, 2015.
  50. Semon, R. W. (1909). Die mnemischen Empfindungen in ihren Beziehungen zu den Originalempfindungen. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. English translation: Semon, R. W. (1923). Mnemonic psychology. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  51. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Toomela, A. (2011). Travel into a fairy land: A critique of modern qualitative and mixed methods psychologies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 21–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uher, J. (under review a). Principles of measurement and quantification in the physical sciences, life sciences, social sciences and in psychology.Google Scholar
  57. Uher, J. (under review b). Objectivity in psychology: Standardised assessments standardise only the data format but not the data generation.Google Scholar
  58. Uher. J. (under review c). What’s wrong with ratings?Google Scholar
  59. Uher, J. (2011). Individual behavioral phenotypes: An integrative meta-theoretical framework. Why ‘behavioral syndromes’ are not analogues of ‘personality’. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 521–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Uher, J. (2013). Personality psychology: Lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story—Why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 1–55.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Uher, J. (2014). Fundamental challenges of contemporary “personality” research. Physics of Life Reviews, 11, 695–696.Google Scholar
  62. Uher, J. (2015a). Conceiving “personality”: Psychologists’ challenges and basic fundamentals of the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, xx–xx. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9283-1
  63. Uher, J. (2015b). Developing “personality” taxonomies: Metatheoretical and methodological rationales underlying selection approaches, methods of data generation and reduction principles. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, xx–xx. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9280-4
  64. Uher, J. (2015c). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual-specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, xx–xx. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9281-3
  65. Uher, J. (2015d). Agency enabled by the Psyche: Explorations using the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 12, 177–228.Google Scholar
  66. Uher, J. (2015e). Comparing individuals within and across situations, groups and species: Metatheoretical and methodological foundations demonstrated in primate behaviour. In D. Emmans & A. Laihinen (Eds.), Comparative Neuropsychology and Brain Imaging (Vol. 2), Series Neuropsychology: An Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 223–284) Berlin: Lit Verlag. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3848.8169
  67. Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s actions: A cultural–historical theory of developmental psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  68. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: History of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, N. Chaudhary, & M. Lyra (Eds.), Handbook of dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 99–121). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. (H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences (E.A. Shils and H.A. Finch, Trans (Eds.)). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
  75. Wundt, W. (1863). Vorlesungen über die Menschen- und Thierseele. Hamburg: Voss.Google Scholar
  76. Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (Vol. 3). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
  77. Wundt, W. (1894). Über psychische Kausalität und das Prinzip des psycho-physischen Parallelismus. Philosophische Studien, 10, 1–124.Google Scholar
  78. Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologie. Stuttgart: Körner. Online at https://archive.org/; Accessed July, 20, 2014.
  79. Wundt, W. (1920). Logik. Eine Untersuchung der Prinzipien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden Wissenschaftlicher Forschung. Band 2. Logik der exakten Wissenschaften (4. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social PsychologyThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Comparative Differential and Personality PsychologyFree University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations