Advertisement

A Novel Micro-shear Tester for Failure Analysis of Fine and Cohesive Granular Matter

  • Lutz Torbahn
  • Stefan Strege
  • Arno Kwade
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 41)

Abstract

We apply a novel micro-shear tester (μST) to investigate the shear flow behaviour of very small granular volumes (15 μl). We compare the results to standard ring shear devices which confirm that these small volumes are sufficient for granular flow analysis, and hence are helpful to identify the stable and unstable areas of very small granular quantities. Within the laboratory experiments we realised shear tests by using a torsional shear movement which was applied to a cohesive granular calcium carbonate. For the analysis of the shear behaviour the yield loci are used which were derived from the bulk shear and normal stresses. The comparison of the yield loci determined by μST and ring shear device shows only a minor deviation. A particle characterization of the calcium carbonate material according to the particle size distribution with a mean grain size of 5 μm using laser diffraction and determining cohesion forces on single particles with 34 nN using an atomic force microscope (AFM) is part of this study. Finally, we combine a X-ray computed tomography (XCT) with the μST to reveal changes in the microstructure and notice shear bands caused by the shearing process.

Keywords

Failure behaviour Granular flow Micro-shear tester X-ray computed tomography Atomic force microscopy Calcium carbonate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank, Stefan Kreiter and Jürgen Tomas for very constructive reviews. We also would like to thank the DFG for financial support within SPP 1486.

References

  1. Butt H-J, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59(1–6):1–152. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fuchs R, Weinhart T, Meyer J, Zhuang H, Staedler T, Jiang X, Luding S (2014) Rolling, sliding and torsion of micron-sized silica particles: experimental, numerical and theoretical analysis. Granul Matter 16(3):281–297. doi: 10.1007/s10035-014-0481-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hampton MA, Lee HJ, Locat J (1996) Submarine landslides. Rev Geophys 34:33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jenike AW (1964) Storage and flow of solids, Bulletin of the University of Utah. University of Utah – Utah Engineering Experiment Station, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  5. Locat J, Lee HJ (2002) Submarine landslides: advances and challenges. Can Geotech J 39(1):193–212. doi: 10.1139/t01-089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mader-Arndt K, Kutelova Z, Fuchs R, Meyer J, Staedler T, Hintz W, Tomas J (2014) Single particle contact versus particle packing behavior: model based analysis of chemically modified glass particles. Granul Matter 16(3):359–375. doi: 10.1007/s10035-013-0478-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marone C (1998) Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 26:643–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schulze D (1994) Development and application of a novel ring shear tester. Aufbereitungstechnik 35(10):524–535Google Scholar
  9. Schulze D (2008) Powders and bulk solids. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73768-1 Google Scholar
  10. Strege S (2014) Röntgenmikrotomographische Analyse der Verdichtung und Scherung feiner und kohäsiver Pulver. Dissertation, TU BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  11. Strege S, Weuster A, Zetzener H, Brendel L, Kwade A, Wolf DE (2014) Approach to structural anisotropy in compacted cohesive powder. Granul Matter 16(3):401–409. doi: 10.1007/s10035-013-0454-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sultan N, Cochonat P, Canals M, Cattaneo A, Dennielou B, Haflidason H, Laberg JS, Long D, Mienert J, Trincardi F, Urgeles R, Vorren TO, Wilson C (2004) Triggering mechanisms of slope instability processes and sediment failures on continental margins: a geotechnical approach. Mar Geol 213(1–4):291–321. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Torbahn L, Huhn K (2014) Interrelationship between sediment fabric, pore volume variations as indicator for pore pressure changes, and sediment shear strength. In: Krastel S, Behrmann J-H, Völker D et al (eds) Submarine mass movements and their consequences, vol 37, Advances in natural and technological hazards research. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 85–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00972-8_8
  14. Wargenau A, Kwade A (2010) Determination of adhesion between single aspergillus Niger spores in aqueous solutions using an atomic force microscope. Langmuir 26(13):11071–11076. doi: 10.1021/la100653c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wright SG, Rathje EM (2003) Triggering mechanisms of slope instability and their relationship to earthquakes and tsunamis. Pure Appl Geophys 160(10-11):1865–1877. doi: 10.1007/s00024-003-2410-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xradia (2011) MicroXCT-200 and microXCT-400, user’s guide, vol version 8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Particle Technology (iPAT)TU BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.BASF SELudwigshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations