Advertisement

Designing Simulation-Based Training for Prehospital Emergency Care: Participation from a Participant Perspective

  • Beatrice AlenljungEmail author
  • Hanna Maurin Söderholm
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

Simulation-based training for prehospital emergency care is characterized by high degrees of complexity. Thorough knowledge of both the work and the setting is crucial and it is therefore important to involve both end-users and other stakeholders during the whole design process. This paper investigates a design process by focusing on how project participants experience the work process and participation of a multi-disciplinary, research-practitioner design team. This case study focuses on the work within a development project of a new prehospital emergency training facility. Open-ended interviews were conducted with the project participants halfway through the project. Strikingly, the results show that while there are problems and tensions that potentially could overturn the project, all participants express strong satisfaction with their participation in the project. This implies that the accumulated positive experiences are so strong that they overshadow tensions and problems that under other circumstances could have caused a project breakdown.

Keywords

User participation Participatory design Simulation-based training Prehospital emergency care 

References

  1. 1.
    Alklind Taylor, A.: Facilitation matters: A framework for instructor-led serious gaming. Doctoral Thesis, School of Informatics, University of Skövde, Sweden, Thesis No. 4. (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Backlund, P., Heldal, I., Engström, H., Johannesson, M., Lebram, M.: Collaboration patterns in mixed reality environments for a new emergency training center. In: Modelling Symposium (EMS), 2013 European., p. 483–488. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Söderström, E., van Laere, J., Backlund, P., Maurin Söderholm, H.: Combining Work Process Models to Identify Training Needs in the Prehospital Care Process. In: Johansson, B., Andersson, B., Holmberg, N. (eds.) BIR 2014. LNBIP, vol. 194, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Söderholm, H.M., Sonnenwald, D.H.: Visioning future emergency healthcare collaboration: perspectives from large and small medical centers. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 61(9), 1808–1823 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sonnenwald, D.H., Söderholm, H.M., Welch, G.F., Cairns, B.A., Manning, J.E., Fuchs, H. Illuminating collaboration in emergency health care situations: paramedic-physician collaboration and 3D telepresence technology. Inform Res. 19(2) p. 618 (2014). http://InformationR.net/ir/19–2/paper618.html. Accessed 6 Oct. 2014
  6. 6.
    Lynch, T., Gregor, S.: User participation in decision support systems development: influencing system outcomes. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 13, 286–301 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kujala, S.: Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behav. Inform. Technol. 28(6), 457–473 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.): Participatory design Principles and practices. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanoff, H.: Editorial: Special issue on participatory design. Design Stud. 28, 213–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., Kyng, M. (eds.): Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Aldershot (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kristensen, M., Kyng, M., Palen, L.: Participatory design in emergency medical service: designing for future practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2006 pp. 161–170. Montréal, Québec, Canada. (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Büscher, M., Mogensen, P. H.: Designing for material practices of coordinating emergency teamwork. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowen, S., McSeveny, K., Lockley, E., Wolstenholme, D., Cobb, M., Dearden, A.: How was it for you?experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. Co Design: International Journal of Co Creation in Design and the Arts 9(4), 230–246 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S.: Impediments to user gains: Experiences from a critical participatory design project. In: Proceedings of PDC 2012, pp. 31–40. Roskilde, Denmark (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vines, J., Clarke R., Wright, P., Sejer Iversen, O., Wah Leong, T., McCarthy, J., Olivier, P.: Summary Report on CHI 2012 invited SIG: Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design? (2012). http://di.ncl.ac.uk/participation/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files/2012/09/CHISIGReportFinal.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2015
  16. 16.
    Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Inform. Software Tech 58, 148–169 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM 28(3), 300–311 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martikainen, S., Korpela, M., Tiihonen, T.: User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers’ viewpoint in Finland. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83, 189–200 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Subramanyam, R., Weisstein, F.L., Krishnan, M.S.: User participation in software developments projects. Commun. ACM 53(3), 137–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iivari, N.: “Constructing the users” in open source software development: an interpretative case study of user participation. Inform. Technol. People 22(2), 132–156 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu, J.-T.B., Marakas, G.M.: The impact of operational user participation on perceived system implementation success: an empirical investigation. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 46(5), 127–140 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Iivari, N.: Participatory design in OSS development: interpretive case studies in company and community OSS development contexts. Behav. Inform. Technol. 30(3), 309–323 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khaled, R., Vasalou, A.: Bridging serious games and participatory design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (2014) In PressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olsson, E., Jansson, A.: Participatory design with train drivers – a process analysis. Interact. Comput. 17, 147–166 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.University of BoråsBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations