Advertisement

Using Readers’ and Organizations’ Goals to Guide Assessment of Success in Information Websites

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9169)

Abstract

Informational and reference websites benefit readers without providing their publishing organizations with any direct or immediate financial benefit; however, organizations do expect return on their investment. We propose two website stakeholder taxonomies: one about the goals of readers when they use informational websites and the other about the goals of organizations when they produce sites. These taxonomies should help organizations measure readers’ success with their sites and understand how well their sites support the organizations’ goals, and in turn help them author and design better web content to meet their readers’ goals.

Keywords

Reader goals Organization goals User goals Usability Measurement Metrics Effectiveness Efficiency User satisfaction User-Centered Design (UCD) 

References

  1. 1.
    Schaupp, L.C., Fan, W., Belanger, F.: Determining success for website goals. In: HICCS 2006 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6, p. 107.2 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rouet, J.F.: The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning, 1st edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Redish, J.: Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content that Works, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Elsevier, Waltham (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watson, R.: Incorporating usability into the API design process. In: Albers, M., Still, B. (eds.) Usability of Complex Information Systems: Evaluation of User Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - part 11: Guidance on Usability (ISO/9241-11/1998). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quesenbery, W.: Balancing the 5Es of usability. Cut. IT J. 17(2), 4–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, J., Loranger, H.: Prioritizing Web usability. New Riders Publishing, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hertzum, M.: Images of usability. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 26(6), 567–600 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newman, W., Taylor, A.: Towards a methodology employing critical parameters to deliver performance improvements in interactive systems. In: Proceedings of IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 605–612. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bevan, N.: Measuring usability as quality of use. Softw. Qual. J. 4, 115–150 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, P., von Dran, G.M.: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: a two-factor model for website design and evaluation. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(14), 1253–1268 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elling, S., Lentz, L., de Jong, M.: Website evaluation questionnaire: development of a research-based tool for evaluating informational websites. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 293–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hornbaek, K.: Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 79–102 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Google. (n.d.). Features – Google Analytics. http://www.google.com/analytics/features/. Accessed 31 January 2015
  16. 16.
    Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M.: Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edn. Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redish, J.C.: Reading to learn to do. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 30(4), 289–293 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sticht, T.G., Fox, L.C., Hauke, R.N., Zapf, D.W.: The Role of Reading in the Navy. DTIC Document (1977)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brandt, J., Guo, P.J., Lewenstein, J., Dontcheva, M., Klemmer, S.R.: Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 1589–1598 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Google (n.d.). Bounce Rate - Analytics Help. https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1009409?hl=en. Accessed 1 February 2015
  21. 21.
    Google (n.d.). Time on Page - Analytics Help. https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1006924?hl=en. Accessed 1 February 2015
  22. 22.
    Tidwell, J.: Designing Interfaces, 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Halvorson, K., Rach, M.: Content Strategy for the Web. New Riders Publishing, Berkeley (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F.: Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harv. Bus. Rev. 81(11), 88–95 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McGovern, G.: Killer Web Content: Make the Sale, Deliver the Service, Build the Brand, 1st edn. A&C Black Trade, London (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keller, K.L.: Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 57(1), 1–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Farris, P.W., Bendle, N.T., Pfeifer, P.E., Reibstein, D.J.: Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. FT Press, Upper Saddle River (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reichheld, F.F.: The one number you need to grow. Harv. Bus. Rev. 81, 46–55 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sauro, J.: Should the Net Promoter Score Go? 5 Common Criticisms Examined (2014). http://www.measuringu.com/blog/nps-go.php. Accessed 8 February 2015
  30. 30.
    Freed, L.: Innovating Analytics: How the Next Generation of Net Promoter Can Increase Sales and Drive Business Results, 1st edn. Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bitner, M.J., Ostrom, A.L., Meuter, M.L.: Implementing successful self-service technologies. Acad. Manag. Exec. 16(4), 96–108 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Centered Design & EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations