Beyond the Wall of Text: How Information Design Can Make Contracts User-Friendly
This study investigates the unique contribution of layout and visual cues to the comprehension of complex texts. Contracts are taken as a key example of cumbersome, complex texts that most laypeople do not like to read, and avoid reading altogether if possible. By means of information design, the meaning of contracts can be made more readily visible and understandable to their intended user-group. An experimental evaluation shows how it is not enough to simply reorganise the text in a more logical, user-friendly order, but real improvements in comprehension speed and accuracy can only be observed when enhancements to the textual structure of the contract are accompanied by an improved layout and other visual solutions.
KeywordsDocument design Information design Contracts Experimental evaluation User experience Usability Complex information Cognitive load theory
This research was kindly funded by the FIMECC UXUS project (User Experience & Usability in Complex Systems) and Tekes – the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation.
- 1.Albers, M.J.: Information salience and interpreting information. In: SIGDOC 2007, 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, pp. 80–86. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Fryar, E.F.: Common-law due process rights in the law of contracts. Tex. Law Rev. 66, 1021–1070 (1988)Google Scholar
- 4.Haapio, H.: Next generation contracts: a paradigm shift. Ph.D. thesis, Lexpert Ltd. (2013)Google Scholar
- 8.Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
- 16.Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper: bringing clarity to the concept of user experience (2010). http://www.allaboutux.org/uxwhitepaper
- 19.Spangenberg, E.R., Voss, K.E., Crowley, A.E.: Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitude: a generally applicable scale. Adv. Consum. Res. 24, 235–241 (1997)Google Scholar
- 23.Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books, New York (2013)Google Scholar
- 25.Passera, S., Pohjonen, S., Koskelainen, K., Anttila, S.: User-friendly contracting tools – a visual guide to facilitate public procurement contracting. In: Proceedings of the IACCM Academic Forum on Contract and Commercial Management 2013. IACCM, Ridgefield (2013)Google Scholar
- 26.GLPi, Schmolka, V.: Results of Usability Testing Research on Plain Language Draft Sections of the Employment Insurance Act. Justice Canada and Human Resources Development Canada (2000). http://www.davidberman.com/wp-content/uploads/glpi-english.pdf
- 27.Kay, M., Terry, M.: Textured agreements: re-envisioning electronic consent. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
- 28.Passera, S., Haapio, H.: The quest for clarity – how visualization improves the usability and user experience of contracts. In: Huang, W., Huang, M. (eds.) DVVA 2013: Innovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics, pp. 191–217. IGI Global, Hershey (2014)Google Scholar