Advertisement

Incommensurable Writings - Examining the Status of Gender Difference Within HCI Coding Practices

  • Michael Heidt
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
  • Arne Berger
  • Paul Rosenthal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9187)

Abstract

Gender relations are reproduced both within HCI development processes as well as within contexts of use. Hence, theorising the subject of gender becomes part of the responsibility of HCI as a form of practice. The fledgling subfield of feminist HCI has created an epistemological basis for thinking through these challenges. The current text seeks to relate to these contributions by analysing practices of coding as they pertain to HCI. We argue that coding is of yet undertheorised regarding the subject of gender relations. By drawing on the semiotic theories of Michael Mateas and combining them with Donna Haraway’s reading of material-semiotic actors, the text aims to provide new impulses for a theorisation of the practice of code-writing as a (potentially gendered) writing practice. It thus aims at increasing the translatability of HCI theory into gender-aware communities of knowledge production.

Keywords

Gender Coding HCI Prototyping Interdisciplinarity Cultural informatics Critical technical practice 

References

  1. 1.
    Bardzell, S.: Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 1301–1310. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrison, S., Sengers, P., Tatar, D.: Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interact. Comput. 23(5), 385–392 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tatar, D., Harrison, S.: CHI 2011 Feminism, HCI and Control. In: Feminism and Interaction Design Workshop at CHI 2011, pp. 1–7 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J.: Towards a feminist hci methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, pp. 675–684. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haraway, D.: Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud. 14(3), 575 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mateas, M.: Semiotic considerations in an artificial intelligence-based art practice. Dichtung Digital: J. Digital Aesthetics 29 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Latour, B.: The Pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ceruzzi, P.E.: A history of modern computing. MIT press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cramer, F.: Words Made Flesh: Code Culture Imagination. Piet Zwart Institute, Rotterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Expressive Processing: Digital fictions, computer games, and software studies. MIT press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Floyd, C.: Software development as reality construction. In: Floyd, C., Züllighoven, H., Budde, R., Keil-Slawik, R. (eds.) Software Development and Reality Construction SE - 10, pp. 86–100. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLean, A.: Textility of live code. In: Torque#1. Mind, Language and Technology, Link Editions, pp. 141–144 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cox, G.: Speaking Code: Coding as Aesthetic and Political Expression. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geiger, R.S.: Bots, bespoke, code and the materiality of software platforms. Inf. Commun. Soc. 17(3), 342–356 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rönkkö, K.: Interpretation, interaction and reality construction in software engineering: an explanatory model. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 682–693 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuller, M.: Elegance. A Lexicon, Software Studies, pp. 87–91 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krysa, J., Sedek, G.: Source code. Software studies\(\backslash \)a lexicon, 236 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blackwell, A., McLean, A., Noble, J., Rohrhuber, J.: Collaboration and learning through live coding (Dagstuhl Seminar 13382). Dagstuhl Rep. 3(9), 130–168 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Collins, N.: Live Coding of Consequence. Leonardo 44(3), 207–211 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Collins, N., McLEAN, A., Rohrhuber, J., Ward, A.: Live coding in laptop performance. Organised Sound 8(03), 321–330 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dean, R.T.: Hyperimprovisation: Computer-interactive Sound Improvisation. AR Editions Inc, Middleton (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heidt, M.: Extemporising digital empowerment. In: Human-Computer Improvisation, Workshop at the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS 2014, Vancouver, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse Ecologies – Interdisciplinary Development for Cultural Education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Metcalfe, M.: Generalisation: Learning across epistemologies. Forum Qual. Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual. Soc. Res. 6(1), 10 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blackwell, A., Wilson, L., Boulton, C., Knell, J.: Creating Value Across Boundaries; Maximizing the Return from Interdisciplinary Innovation. NESTA Research Report, London (2010) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barry, A., Born, G., Weszkalnys, G.: Logics of interdisciplinarity. Econ. Soc. 37(1), 20–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heidt, M., Pfeiffer, L., Berger, A., Rosenthal, P.: PRMD. In: Mensch and Computer 2014 - Workshopband, De Gruyter Oldenbourg (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wuttke, M., Heidt, M.: Beyond presentation - employing proactive intelligent agents as social catalysts. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8511, pp. 182–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oppermann, R., Specht, M., Jaceniak, I.: Hippie: a nomadic information system. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, pp. 330–333. Springer, Heidelberg (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heidt, M.: Prototypengestütztes reframing am beispiel forschungsorientierter systementwicklung. In: Mensch & Computer Workshopband, pp. 191–196 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heidt, M.: Examining interdisciplinary prototyping in the context of cultural communication. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heidt, M.: Reconstructing coding practice - towards a methodology for source-code. In: Boll, S., Maaß, S., Malaka, R. (eds.) Mensch and Computer 2013 - Workshopband, pp. 271–275. Oldenbourg Verlag, München (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Curtis, B., Iscoe, N.: Modeling the software design process. In: Zunde, P., Hocking, D., eds.: Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science V, pp. 21–27. Springer, US (1990)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Strauss, A.L.: Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1978)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Strauss, A.L.: Continual Permutations of Action. AldineTransaction, New Brunswick (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Naur, P.: Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and Microprogramming 15(5), 253–261 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Butler, J.: Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre J. 40(4), 519–531 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haraway, D.J.: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Heidt
    • 1
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
    • 1
  • Arne Berger
    • 2
  • Paul Rosenthal
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Training Group crossWorldsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Chair Media InformaticsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  3. 3.Visual Computing GroupChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations