Advertisement

Useful or Easy-to-Use? Knowing What Older People Like about Near Field Communication Technology

  • Pei-Lee TehEmail author
  • Pervaiz K. Ahmed
  • Alan H. S. Chan
  • Soon-Nyean Cheong
  • Wen-Jiun Yap
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9193)

Abstract

The goals of this study are two-fold: (1) To develop a novel concept of a light system with the use of Near Field Communication (NFC)-enabled technology, Bluetooth and Raspberry-PI. This new system is known as NFC Light System (NLS). (2) To set up an experimental design to examine the influence of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on older adults’ behavioral intention to use the NLS. Our proposed system was empirically tested with 33 older adults in Malaysia. Our findings show that perceived ease of use appears to be the primary factor for the older adults to use the NLS. Interestingly, perceived usefulness was not a significant predictor of older adults’ behavioral intention to use the NLS. From the practical viewpoint, this study offers a new insight for gerontechnology manufacturer and developers to focus their design efforts on easy-to-use attribute that are desired by older adults.

Keywords

Technology acceptance model Experimental design Gerontechnology Near field communication Malaysia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Government of Malaysia, and Monash University Malaysia campus for financially supporting this research under contract ES-1-14/06-02-10-SF0211 and B-5-14. The authors would also like to thank all the research assistants (Cherish Voo Wen Yee, Natalie Ong Xi Men, Jayden Liew Yee Jin, Wong Poh Teng and Esther Tan En Yi) in the data collection. Most of all, heartfelt gratitude goes to the respondents of the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(6), 2904–2927 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouma, H., Fozard, J.L., Bouwhuis, D.G., Taipale, V.: Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology 6(4), 190–216 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun, M.T.: Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 673–680 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chau, P.Y.K.: An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 185–204 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: The ageing population of China and a review of gerontechnology. Gerontechnology 10(2), 63–71 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: Predictors of gerontechnology acceptance by older Hong Kong Chinese. Technovation 34(2), 126–135 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fozard, J.L.: Impacts of technology interventions on health and self-esteem. Gerontechnology 4(2), 63–76 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fozard, J.L., Rietsema, J., Bouma, H., Graafmans, J.A.M.: Gerontechnology: creating enabling environments for the challenges and opportunities of aging. Educ. Gerontechnology 26(4), 331–344 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heart, T., Kalderon, E.: Older adults: are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int. J Med. Inform. 82(11), e209–e231 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., Angst, C.M.: Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Q. 30(4), 781–804 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K., Chen, Z.: Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf. Manag. 42(8), 1095–1104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leong, L.Y., Hew, T.S., Tan, G.W.H., Ooi, K.B.: Predicting the determinants of the NFC-enabled mobile credit card acceptance: a neural networks approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(14), 5604–5620 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McKenna, B., Tuunanen, T., Gardner, L.: Consumers’ adoption of information services. Inf. Manag. 50(5), 248–257 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pan, S., Jordan-Marsh, M.: Internet Use intention and adoption among chinese older adults: from the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 1111–1119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pesonen, J., Horster, E.: Near field communication technology in tourism. Tourism Manag. Perspect. 4, 11–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phang, C.W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B.C.Y., Teo, H.H.: Senior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: a study in the context of e-Government services. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53(4), 555–569 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryu, M.H., Kim, S., Lee, E.: Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user’s participation in video UCC services. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(3), 619–632 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sintonen, S., Immonen, M.: Telecare services for aging people: assessment of critical factors influencing the adoption intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1307–1317 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Straub, D., Limayem, M., Karahanna-Evaristo, E.: measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Manag. Sci. 41(8), 1328–1342 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teh, P.L., Ahmed, P.K., Cheong, S.N., Yap, W.J.: Age-group differences in near field communication smartphone. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 114(3), 484–502 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Population Ageing 2013. ST/ESA/SER.A/348 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Bronswijk, J.E.M.H., Bouma, H., Fozard, J.L.: Technology for quality of life: an enriched taxonomy. Gerontechnology 2(2), 169–172 (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Volland, D., Noyen, K., Kayikci, O., Ackermann, L., Michahelles, F.: Switching the role of NFC tag and reader for the implementation of smart posters. In: 2012 fourth International Workshop on Near Field Communication, pp. 63–68, Helsinki (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhou, J., Rau, P.L.P., Salvendy, G.: Older adults’ use of smart phones: an investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of new functions. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(6), 552–560 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pei-Lee Teh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pervaiz K. Ahmed
    • 1
  • Alan H. S. Chan
    • 2
  • Soon-Nyean Cheong
    • 3
  • Wen-Jiun Yap
    • 3
  1. 1.School of BusinessMonash UniversityBandar SunwayMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong
  3. 3.Faculty of EngineeringMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations