Advertisement

HCI and the Community of Non-users

  • Michael Heidt
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
  • Linda Pfeiffer
  • Paul Rosenthal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9186)

Abstract

HCI’s success as a discipline is based on its ability of dealing with the problems, desires, and requirements of technology users. Through its turn to user experience, the community was able to create products whose use is pleasant and exciting. There are, however, design contexts where the corresponding focus on fostering use might be in need of a complementing perspective.

During the last couple of years, the topic of technology non-use has appeared within the scope of HCI. Within this text, we will explore how these recent conceptualisations and analyses can be employed in order to turn non-use into a design resource. We do so by discussing them in the context of a concrete development project aimed at creating interactive technology for exhibition contexts.

Keywords

Non-use HCI Prototyping Interdisciplinarity Cultural informatics Critical technical practice 

References

  1. 1.
    Baumer, E.P., Adams, P., Khovanskaya, V.D., Liao, T.C., Smith, M.E., Schwanda Sosik, V., Williams, K.: Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 3257–3266. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumer, E.P., Ames, M.G., Brubaker, J.R., Burrell, J., Dourish, P.: Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use. In: CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2014, pp. 65–68. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., Tscheligi, M.: Human-computer non-interaction: the activity of non-use. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS Companion 2014, pp. 57–60. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satchell, C., Dourish, P.: Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI 2009, pp. 9–16. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latour, B.: Technology is society made durable. Sociol. Rev. 38(S1), 103–131 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexander, C.: Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1964)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Center for Environmental Structure Series). Oxford University Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: Designing modular and integrative systems. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference Proceedings, DETC00/DTM, vol. 14571 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. J. Mech. Design 125(2), 240–252 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heidt, M., Pfeiffer, L., Berger, A., Rosenthal, P.: PRMD. In: Mensch and Computer 2014 - Workshopband, pp. 45–48. De Gruyter Oldenbourg (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heidt, M.: Examining interdisciplinary prototyping in the context of cultural communication. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse ecologies – interdisciplinary development for cultural education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wuttke, M., Heidt, M.: Beyond presentation - employing proactive intelligent agents as social catalysts. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8511, pp. 182–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Storz, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Fraas, C., Eibl, M.: ComforTable: a tabletop for relaxed and playful interactions in museums. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 2014, pp. 447–450. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berger, A., Heidt, M., Eibl, M.: Towards a vocabulary of prototypes in interaction design – a criticism of current practice. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8517, pp. 25–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berger, A., Heidt, M., Eibl, M.: Conduplicated symmetries: renegotiating the material basis of prototype research. In: Chakrabarti, A. (ed.) ICoRD 2015 Research into Design Across Boundaries. Number 34 in Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 71–78. Springer, India (2015) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Latour, B.: Coming out as a philosopher. Soc. Stud. Sci. 40(4), 599–608 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Latour, B.: On recalling ANT. In: Law, J., Hassard, J. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, pp. 15–25. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Metcalfe, M.: Generalisation: learning across epistemologies. Forum Qual. Sozialforschung/Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 6(1), 27 (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mayring, P.: On generalization in qualitatively oriented research. Forum Qual. Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual. Soc. Res. 8(3), 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3), 387–420 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Star, S.L.: This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 35(5), 601–617 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wyatt, S.: Non-users also matter: the construction of users and non-users of the internet. In: Oudshoorn, N., Pinch, T.J. (eds.) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies, Inside Technology, pp. 67–79. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Selwyn, N.: Apart from technology: understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technol. Soc. 25(1), 99–116 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser, M.: Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 36(7), 75–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3(3), 3–11 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Janlert, L.E., Stolterman, E.: Complex interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17(2), 8:1–8:32 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Derthick, K.: Exploring meditation and technology to problematize the use-or-non-use binary. In: Refusing, Limiting, Departing - Workshop @CHI 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hallnäs, L., Redström, J.: Slow technology - designing for reflection. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5(3), 201–212 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Heidt
    • 1
  • Kalja Kanellopoulos
    • 1
  • Linda Pfeiffer
    • 2
  • Paul Rosenthal
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Training Group crossWorldsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Visual Computing GroupChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations