Advertisement

Changes in Educational Inequality in Cross-National Perspective

  • Pia N. Blossfeld
  • Gwendolin J. Blossfeld
  • Hans-Peter Blossfeld
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

In the process of educational expansion and reforms, the old sharp divisions between academic and vocational/technical tracks in the secondary school systems of modern societies have greatly diminished and the proportion of young people who have completed at least upper secondary education has risen impressively. Also, the enrollment in higher education has quickly grown in all modern countries and turned their tertiary educational systems into institutions of mass education. Using truly comparative data from the PIAAC study, we analyze how the educational attainment of men and women from families with different educational backgrounds has changed over time in 22 modern societies. The results show that there are great cross-national differences in the development of inequality of educational opportunity.

Keywords

Educational expansion Educational opportunities Gender inequalities Cross-national comparison Social inequality Life course research 

References

  1. Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckmann, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. Discussion Paper No. 5500. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, D. (2014). The schooled society. The educational transformation of global culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, R. (2014). Reversal of gender differences in educational attainment – Historical analysis of the west German case. Educational Research, 56, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benavot, A., & Resnik, J. (2006). Lessons from the past: A comparative socio-historical analysis of primary and secondary education. In A. Benavot, J. Resnik, & J. Corrales (Eds.), Global educational expansion historical legacies and political obstacles (pp. 1–89). Cambridge (MA): American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  5. Bernardi, F., & Cebolla-Boado, H. (2014). Previous school results and social background: Compensation and imperfect information in educational transitions. European Sociological Review, 30, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, P., & Blossfeld, G. (2014). Educational expansion from below. The logic of educational expansion in modern societies. (Unpublished paper, work in progress).Google Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Hakim, C. (1997). Between equalization and marginalization : women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Dobnič, S. (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary societies. A cross-national comparison of the transition from male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blossfeld, H.-P., Mills, M., Klijzing, E., & Kurz, K. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Boli, J., Ramirez, F., & Meyer, J. (1985). Explaining the origins and expansion of mass education. Comparative Education Review, 29, 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bos, W., Hornberg, S., Arnold, K.-H., Faust, G., Fried, L., Lankes, E.-M., Schwippert, K., & Valtin, R. (2007). IGLU 2006. Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  13. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inquiry. Changing prospects in Western society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1973). Kulturelle Reproduktion und soziale Reproduktion. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Grundlagen einer Theorie der symbolischen Gewalt (pp. 88–137). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America (Vol. 57). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9, 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment. Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 5, 1475–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2010). Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review, 26, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breen, R., van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Meier Jæger, M. (2014). Deciding under doubt: A theory of risk aversion, time discounting preferences, and educational decision-making. European Sociological Review, 30, 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buis, M. L. (2011). The consequences of unobserved heterogeneity in a sequential logit model. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buis, M. L. (2013). The composition of family background: The influence of the economic and cultural resources of both parents on the offsping’s educational attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991. European Sociological Review, 29, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2012). Decomposing ‘social origins’: The effects of parents’ class, status, and education on the educational attainment of their children. European Sociological Review, 28, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2005). Human capital policy. In J. J. Heckman & A. B. Krueger (Eds.), Inequality in America. What role for human capital policies? (pp. 77–239). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Collins, R. (1971). Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 36, 1002–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cummings, W. (2003). The institutions of education: A comparative study of educational development in Six core nations. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  26. DiPrete, T., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  27. DiPrete, T., Goux, D., Maurin, E., & Quesnel-Vallee, A. (2006). Work and pay in flexible and regulated labor markets: A generalized perspective on institutional evolution and inequality trends in Europe and the U.S. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ditton, H. (2010). Schullaufbahnen und soziale Herkunft – eine Frage von Leistung oder Diskriminierung? In S. Aufenanger, F. Hamburger, L. Ludwig, & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Bildung in der Demokratie (pp. 79–99). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  29. Dollmann, J. (2011). Verbindliche und unverbindliche Grundschulempfehlungen und soziale Ungleichheiten am ersten Bildungsübergang. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 63, 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elder, G. H., & Shanahan, M. J. (2006). The life course and human development. In R. E. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), The handbook of child psychology. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 665–715). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Elder, G. H., Johnson, K. M., & Crosnoe, R. (2004). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18, 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ermisch, J., & Francesconi, M. (2001). Family matters: Impacts of family background on educational attainments. Economica, 68, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Esser, H. (2014). Bildungssysteme und ethnische Bildungsungleichheiten. Unpublished manuscript. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research. Mannheim University.Google Scholar
  38. Gerber, T. P. (2000). Educational stratification in contemporary Russia: Stability and change in the face of economic and institutional crisis. Sociology of Education, 73, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gerber, T. P., & Hout, M. (1995). Educational stratification in Russia during the Soviet period. American Journal of Sociology, 3, 611–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1983). Women and class analysis: In defence of the conventional view. Sociology, 17, 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2009). The education gospel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews/Neuroscience, 11, 651–659.Google Scholar
  43. Hanmer, M. J., & Kalkan, K. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heeringa, S. G., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hout, M. (2006). Maximally maintained inequality and essentially maintained inequality: Cross-national comparisons. Sociological Theory and Methods, 21, 253–278.Google Scholar
  46. Iannelli, C. (2003). Parental education and young people’s educational and labour market outcomes: A comparison across Europe. In I. Kogan & W. Müller (Eds.), School-to-work transitions in Europe: Analyses of the EU LFS 2000 ad hoc module. Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, M. (2013). Introduction. How is inequality of educational opportunity generated? The case for primary and secondary effects. In M. Jackson (Ed.), Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment (pp. 1–33). Standford: Standford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jang, S., & Kim, N. (2004). Transition from high school to higher education and work in Korea, from the competency-based education perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson, W., Penke, L., & Spinath, F. (2011). Heritability in the era of molecular genetics. Some thoughts for understanding genetic influences on behavioural traits. European Journal of Personality, 25, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Katz, L. F., & Autor, D. H. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In O. Aschenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1463–1555). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  52. Kirsch, I., & Thorn, W. (2013). Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). http://www.oecd.org/site/piaac/_Technical%20Report_17OCT13.pdf
  53. Lenski, G. E. (1966). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books.Google Scholar
  54. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality. Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  55. Mare, R. D. (1981). Trends in schooling: Demography, performance, and organization. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 435, 96–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mare, R. (1993). Educational stratification on observed and unobserved components of family background. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.), Persistent inequality (pp. 351–376). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. Mateju, P., Rehakova, B., & Simonova, N. (2003). Transition to university under communism and after its demise. The role of socio-economic background in the transition between secondary and tertiary education in the Czech Republic 1948–1998 (pp. 301–324). Prague: Institute of Sociology, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  58. Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Rubinson, R., & Boli-Bennett, J. (1977). The world educational revolution, 1950–1970. Sociology of Education, 50, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. OECD. (1999). Classifying educational programmes. Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  60. Park, H. (2009). Inequality of educational opportunity in Korea by gender, socio-economic background, and family structure. The International Journal of Human Rights, 11, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park, H. (2010). Japanese and Korean high schools and students in comparative perspective. In J. Dronkers (Ed.), Quality and inequality of educdatioan. Cross-national perspectives (pp. 255–273). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pfeffer, F. (2006). The institutional context of educational attainment. Intergenerational educational mobility in comparative perspective. Presented at the ECSR Prague Conference September 2006.Google Scholar
  63. Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921–1975. Sociology of Education, 1, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rohwer, G. (2014). A defence of the sequential transition model. (Paper is in progress).Google Scholar
  65. Schoon, I., & Eccles, J. S. (2014). Gender differences in aspiration and attainment: A life course perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Shanahan, M. J., Vaisey, S., Erickson, L. D., & Smolen, A. (2008). Environmental contingencies and genetic propensities: Social capital, educational continuation, and dopamine receptor gene DRD2. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 260–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persistent inequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  68. Simkus, A., & Andorka, R. (1982). Educational attainment in Hungary. American Sociological Review, 47, 740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steinmetz, S. (2013). The contextual challenges of occupational sex segregation. Deciphering cross-national differences in Europe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  70. Treiman, D. J. (1970). Industrialization and social stratification. Sociological Inquiry, 40(2), 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. UNESCO. (2012). International standard classification of education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics: Montreal. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/isced-2011-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  72. Weinert, S., Artelt, C., Prenzel, M., Senkbeil, M. Ehmke, T., & Carstensen, C. H. (2011). Development of competences across the life span. In H.-P. Blossfeld, J.-G. Roßbach, & J. von Maurice (Eds.), Education as a lifelong process. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14, 67–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pia N. Blossfeld
    • 1
  • Gwendolin J. Blossfeld
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Blossfeld
    • 2
  1. 1.Nuffield CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.European University Institute FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations