The Bologna Process Goes East? from “Third Countries” to Prioritizing Inter-regional Cooperation Between the ASEAN and EU

Abstract

The Bologna Process increasingly prioritizes its dialogues and negotiations with regions over individual countries, thus expanding its outreach to a larger scale. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations—ASEAN and ASEAN+3—which are developing collective mechanisms for regional harmonization, have become one of the strategic regions for the EU partnerships in higher education. This paper draws on policy diffusion approach in regional studies literature and a constructivist approach to policy movement and mutation in geography to examine how Bologna policies have travelled to ASEAN and transformed their features and effects in the new context. Bringing the theoretical frameworks from political science and geography into higher education studies, this paper attempts to make a novel methodological contribution. Tracing the evolution of the ASEAN regional cooperation in higher education over the last four decades and using first-hand empirical data, this paper argues that although the Bologna Process provides a point of reference for ASEAN, the active construction of an ASEAN regional higher education space in its flexible institutional design can become a model in its own right and potentially provide a useful source for reflecting on European Bologna practices.

Keywords

ASEAN Bologna Process Regionalism Policy diffusion Policy mobility Localization 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, L. (2013). Preaching regionalism? Norm diffusion in the EU-ASEAN relationship. (PhD thesis), School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  3. ASEAN. (2009). Chairman’s statement of the 15th ASEAN summit—enhancing connectivity, empowering peoples. http://www.asean.org/news/item/chairman-s-statement-of-the-15th-asean-summit-enhancing-connectivity-empowering-peoples
  4. ASED. (1977). Joint Communique of The First ASEAN education ministers meeting Manila, 8–9 Dec 1977. http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-communique-of-the-first-asean-education-ministers-meeting-manila-8-9-december-1977
  5. ASED. (2014). Joint statement of the eighth ASEAN education ministers meeting. http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/joint-statement-of-the-eighth-asean-education-ministers-meeting-8th-ased?category_id=26. Accessed 23 Dec 2014.
  6. Bergen Communique. (2005). The European higher education area-achieving the goals. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Declarations/Bergen_Communique1.pdf
  7. Berlin Communique. (2003). Realising the European higher education area. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/about/Berlin_Communique1.pdf
  8. BFUG. (2002). Attractiveness, openness and cooperation. The European higher education area and third countries. Report by the Danish Presidency, first draft on 4 November 2002. Copenhagen: Danish Presidency.Google Scholar
  9. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2009). Diffusing (inter-) regionalism: The EU as a model of regional intergration, KFG working paper no. 7. Berlin: Freie University Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2012). When Europeanisation meets diffusion: exploring new territory. West European Politics, 35(1), 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chao, R. (2014a). Pathways to an East Asian higher education area: A comparative analysis of East Asian and European regionalization processes. Higher Education.Google Scholar
  12. Chao, R. (2014b). Harmonising academic calendars: A student mobility tool? In University World Newsx (p. 317), 25 Apr.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, N. (2014). The Bologna process as a model for regional integration. In World education news & review, 3 June.Google Scholar
  14. Cochrane, A., & Ward, K. (2012). Guest editorial: Researching the geographies of policy mobility: Confronting the methodological challenges. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (2012). Towards a critical grammar of education policy movements. In Gita Steiner-Khamsi & Florian Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 21–40). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Dang, Q. (2013). ASEM—the modern silk road: Travelling ideas for education reforms and partnerships between Asia and Europe. Comparative Education, 49(1), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dent, C. (2012). The century belongs to all of us: East Asia regionalism and world society. In C. Dent & J. Dosch (Eds.), The Asia Pacific regionalism and the global system. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doidge, M. (2011). The European union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. (2014). An art of the region: Towards a politics of regioness. New Political Economy, 19(4), 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EU SHARE. (2014). EU support to higher education in ASEAN region (EU SHARE), Guidelines for grant applicants.Google Scholar
  22. Garben, S. (2010). The Bologna process: from a European law perspective. European Law Journal, 16(2), 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 534–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ICEF. (2014). ASEAN poised to usher in new era of regional student mobility, 21 Jan. http://monitor.icef.com/2014/01/asean-poised-to-usher-in-new-era-of-regional-student-mobility/. Accessed 23 Dec 2014.
  25. Jetschke, A., & Lenz, T. (2013). Does regionalism diffuse? A new research agenda for the study of regional organizations. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 626–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jetschke, A., & Murray, P. (2012). Diffusing regional integration: The EU and Southeast Asia. West European Politics, 35(1), 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamibeppu, T. (2013). Effects and influences of the Bologna process on Japan and beyond. Paper presented at the external dimension of the Bologna Process, Dresden, 8–9 Oct 2013.Google Scholar
  28. Koh, A. (2007). Deparochializing education: Globalization, regionalization, and the formation of an ASEAN education space. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(2), 179–195.Google Scholar
  29. Koopmans, R. (1999). Political. Opportunity. Structure. Some splitting to balance the lumping. Sociological Forum, 14(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuroda, K. (2009). Possibilities and challenges in constructing a new regional collaboration educational framework in Asia. Working Paper 2009-E-1. Global Institute for Asian Regional Integration, Waseda University.Google Scholar
  31. Lawn, M. (2003). The ‘usefulness’ of learning: The struggle over governance meaning and the European education space. Discourse, 24(3), 325–336.Google Scholar
  32. McCammon, H., Muse, C., Newman, H., & Terrell, T. (2007). Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: The polictical successes of the U.S. Women’s July movements. American Sociological Review 72, 725–749.Google Scholar
  33. Narine, S. (1998). Institutional theory and Southeast Asia: The case of ASEAN. World Affairs, 161(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  34. Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 1–25.Google Scholar
  35. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods and mutations. Geoforum, 41, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning, 44, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Re-inventing Japan. (2012). Selected mobility programs with ASEAN universities. http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-tenkairyoku/data/shinsa/h24/H24_tenkai_kekka_e.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2014.
  38. Re-inventing Japan. (2013). Selected mobility programs with ASEAN universities. http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-tenkairyoku/data/shinsa/h25/h25_tenkai_kekka_eng.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2014.
  39. Rüland, J. (2010). Balancers, muiltilateral utilities or regionsal identity builders? International relations and the study of interregionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1271–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rüland, J. (2014a). The limits of democratizing interest representation: ASEAN’s regional corporatism and normative challenges. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rüland, J. (2014b). Constructing regionalism domestically: Local actors and foreign policymaking in newly democratised Indonesia. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10, 181–201.Google Scholar
  42. Rüland, J., & Jetschke, A. (2008). 40 years of ASEAN: Perspectives, performance and lessons for change. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sirat, M. (2008). Towards harmonisation of higher education in Southeast Asia: Malaysia’s perspective. http://globalhighered.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/towards-harmonisation-of-higher-education-in-southeast-asia/. Accessed 23 Dec 2014.
  44. Solingen, E. (2012). Of dominoes and firewalls: The domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stubbs, S. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to “global” governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sujatanond, C. (2014). Student mobility enhancement ASEAN international mobility for students (AIMS) programme, presentation by the special advisor to SEAMEO RIHED. Paper presented at the 8th Meeting of Directors General/Secretary General/Commissioner of Higher Education in Southeast Asia, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 27 May 2014.Google Scholar
  47. Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vögtle, E., & Martens, K. (2014). The Bologna process as a template for transnational policy coordination. Policy Studies, 35(3), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wong, B. (2012). Model power or reference point? The EU and the ASEAN charter. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(4), 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamada, R. (2013). Chapter 10 structural transformation of Japanese higher education: Adopting to meet challenges posed by globalisation and market economy. In D. Neubauer, J. Cheol shin & J. N. Hawkins (Eds.), The dynamics of higher education development in East Asia: Asian cultural heritage, western dominance, economic development, and globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Yeo, L. H. (2010). Institutional regionalism versus networked regionalism: Europe and Asia compared. International Politics, 47(3/4), 324–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zgaga, P. (2003). Reforming the curricula in universities of South East Europe in view of the Bologna process. Higher Education in Europe, 28(3).Google Scholar
  53. Zgaga, P. (2006). Looking out: The Bologna process in a global setting: On the “external dimension” of the Bologna process. Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations