Advertisement

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Cognitive Bias Modification in Internet-Based Interventions for Mood, Anxiety and Substance Use Disorders

  • Matthijs BlankersEmail author
  • Elske Salemink
  • Reinout W. Wiers

Abstract

In this chapter, the theoretical background of (computerized) cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT/c-CBT) is presented, along with cognitive bias modification (CBM), a novel set of interventions in which cognitive processes involved in a disorder are directly targeted. Next, the effectiveness of computerized CBT and CBM for common mental health disorders (depression, anxiety disorders and substance use disorders) is evaluated based on recent meta-analyses. Based on the reviewed literature, there is a reasonably strong evidence base for the effectiveness of computerized CBT interventions for depression, anxiety and substance use disorders. The evidence base for stand-alone CBM interventions is not very strong as research findings are heterogeneous – some studies report positive findings whereas others do not. The evidence base for CBM as an adjunct to computerized CBT interventions is accumulating with positive findings regarding the effectiveness. Therefore, it is concluded that based on the currently available evidence, CBM could be a useful add-on to computerized CBT in the clinical treatment of common mental health disorders.

Keywords

Anxiety Disorder Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Attentional Bias Common Mental Disorder Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Rehm J, Shield KD, Rehm MX, Gmel G, Frick U. Modelling the impact of alcohol dependence on mortality burden and the effect of available treatment interventions in the European Union. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23:89–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Effertz T, Mann K. The burden and cost of disorders of the brain in Europe with the inclusion of harmful alcohol use and nicotine addiction. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23(7):742–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13196.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riper H, Blankers M, Hadiwijaya H, Cunningham J, Clarke S, Wiers R, Ebert D, Cuijpers P. Effectiveness of guided and unguided low-intensity internet interventions for adult alcohol misuse: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99912.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Civljak M, Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, Sheikh A, Car J. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD007078.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanagh K, Gega L, Andersson G. Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(2):66–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Lindefors N. Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(6):745–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck JS. Cognitive behavior therapy: basics and beyond. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beck Institute. History of cognitive therapy. Accessed: 6 Feb 2015. URL: https://archive.today/MkHiX.
  10. 10.
    Piaget J, Cook MT. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press; 1952.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4:38–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013;1(2):192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rush AJ, Beck AT, Kovacs M, Hollon SD. Comparative efficacy of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Cogn Ther Res. 1977;1(1):7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stirman SW, Buchhofer R, McLaulin JB, Evans AC, Beck AT. The Beck initiative: a public academic collaborative partnership to implement cognitive therapy in a community behavioral health system. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1302–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khanna MS, Kendall PC. Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(5):737–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spurgeon JA, Wright JH. Computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12(6):547–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wright JH, Wright AS, Albano AM, et al. Computer-assisted cognitive therapy for depression: maintaining efficacy while reducing therapist time. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1158–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waller R, Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychol Med. 2009;39(5):705–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blankers M, Donker T, Riper H. E-mental health in Nederland [E-mental health in the Netherlands]. De Psychol. 2013;48:12–23.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johansson R, Sjöberg E, Sjögren M, Johnsson E, Carlbring P, Andersson T, Rousseau A, Andersson G. Tailored vs. standardized internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for depression and comorbid symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36905.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklícek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2007;37(3):319–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G. Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med. 2010;40(12):1943–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Farrer L, Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Mackinnon A. Internet-based CBT for depression with and without telephone tracking in a national helpline: randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28099.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Furmark T, Carlbring P, Hedman E, Sonnenstein A, Clevberger P, Bohman B, Eriksson A, Hållén A, Frykman M, Holmström A, Sparthan E, Tillfors M, Ihrfelt EN, Spak M, Eriksson A, Ekselius L, Andersson G. Guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(5):440–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Institute for Mental Health Research. MoodGYM website, 2014. URL: https://moodgym.anu.edu.au.
  26. 26.
    Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):265.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lintvedt OK, Griffiths KM, Sørensen K, Østvik AR, Wang CE, Eisemann M, Waterloo K. Evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of unguided internet-based self-help intervention for the prevention of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013;20(1):10–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mackinnon A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive-behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(2):130–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spek V, Nyklícek I, Smits N, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression in people over 50 years old: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Psychol Med. 2007;37(12):1797–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Warmerdam L, van Straten A, Twisk J, Riper H, Cuijpers P. Internet-based treatment for adults with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gerhards SA, de Graaf LE, Jacobs LE, Severens JL, Huibers MJ, Arntz A, Riper H, Widdershoven G, Metsemakers JF, Evers SM. Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(4):310–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Griffiths KM, Farrer L, Christensen H. The efficacy of internet interventions for depression and anxiety disorders: a review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Aust. 2010;192(11 Suppl):S4–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Christensen H, Batterham P, Calear A. Online interventions for anxiety disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(1):7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arnberg FK, Linton SJ, Hultcrantz M, Heintz E, Jonsson U. Internet-delivered psychological treatments for mood and anxiety disorders: a systematic review of their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98118.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wallace P, Murray E, McCambridge J, Khadjesari Z, White IR, Thompson SG, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, Linke S. On-line randomized controlled trial of an internet based psychologically enhanced intervention for people with hazardous alcohol consumption. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e14740.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blankers M, Koeter MW, Schippers GM. Internet therapy versus internet self-help versus no treatment for problematic alcohol use: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79(3):330–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cunningham JA. Comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(4):e107.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Postel MG, de Haan HA, ter Huurne ED, Becker ES, de Jong CA. Effectiveness of a web-based intervention for problem drinkers and reasons for dropout: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(4):e68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Blankers M, Nabitz U, Smit F, Koeter MW, Schippers GM. Economic evaluation of internet-based interventions for harmful alcohol use alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e134.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smit F, Lokkerbol J, Riper H, Majo MC, Boon B, Blankers M. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of health care systems for alcohol use disorders: how implementation of eHealth interventions improves cost-effectiveness. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(e56).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bricker J, Wyszynski C, Comstock B, Heffner JL. Pilot randomized controlled trial of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(10):1756–64.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010;105(8):1381–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction. 2009;104(11):1792–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen YF, Madan J, Welton N, Yahaya I, Aveyard P, Bauld L, Wang D, Fry-Smith A, Munafò MR. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1–205, iii–v.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tossmann HP, Jonas B, Tensil MD, Lang P, Strüber E. A controlled trial of an internet-based intervention program for cannabis users. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14(11):673–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schaub M, Sullivan R, Haug S, Stark L. Web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention to reduce cocaine consumption in problematic cocaine users: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e166.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety: review of technology appraisal 51. Updated 2013. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mathews A, Mackintosh B. A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cogn Ther Res. 1998;22(6):539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RC, Sher KJ, Grenard J, Ames SL, Stacy AW. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86(2):263–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    MacLeod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(1):107–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Amir N, Beard C, Burns M, Bomyea J. Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(1):28–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schmidt NB, Richey JA, Buckner JD, Timpano KR. Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    De Voogd EL, Wiers RW, Prins PJ, Salemink E. Visual search attentional bias modification reduced social phobia in adolescents. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014;45(2):252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    See J, MacLeod C, Bridle R. The reduction of anxiety vulnerability through the modification of attentional bias: a real-world study using a home-based cognitive bias modification procedure. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baert S, De Raedt R, Schacht R, Koster EH. Attentional bias training in depression: therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010;41(3):265–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wells TT, Beevers CG. Biased attention and dysphoria: manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms. Cogn Emot. 2010;24(4):719–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mogoaşe C, David D, Koster EH. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(12):1133–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Field M, Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;183(3):350–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Field M, Duka T, Eastwood B, Child R, Santarcangelo M, Gayton M. Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;192(4):593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Attwood AS, O'Sullivan H, Leonards U, Mackintosh B, Munafò MR. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 2008;103(11):1875–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schoenmakers T, Wiers RW, Jones BT, Bruce G, Jansen AT. Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007;102(3):399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109(4):602–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Salemink E, van den Hout M, Kindt M. Trained interpretive bias: validity and effects on anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38(2):212–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mathews A, Ridgeway V, Cook E, Yiend J. Inducing a benign interpretational bias reduces trait anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38(2):225–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Salemink E, van den Hout M, Kindt M. Effects of positive interpretive bias modification in highly anxious individuals. J Anxiety Disord. 2009;23(5):676–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Steinman SA, Teachman BA. Modifying interpretations among individuals high in anxiety sensitivity. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(1):71–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Salemink E, van den Hout M, Kindt M. How does cognitive bias modification affect anxiety? Mediation analyses and experimental data. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010;38(1):59–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lau JY. Cognitive bias modification of interpretations: a viable treatment for child and adolescent anxiety? Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(10):614–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Menne-Lothmann C, Viechtbauer W, Höhn P, Kasanova Z, Haller SP, Drukker M, van Os J, Wichers M, Lau JY. How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100925.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Blackwell SE, Holmes EA. Modifying interpretation and imagination in clinical depression: a single case series using cognitive bias modification. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2010;24:338–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rohrbacher H, Blackwell SE, Holmes EA, Reinecke A. Optimizing the ingredients for imagery-based interpretation bias modification for depressed mood: is self-generation more effective than imagination alone? J Affect Disord. 2014;152–154:212–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Williams AD, Blackwell SE, Mackenzie A, Holmes EA, Andrews G. Combining imagination and reason in the treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial of internet-based cognitive-bias modification and internet-CBT for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81(5):793–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Salemink E, Wiers RW. Alcohol-related memory associations in positive and negative affect situations: drinking motives, working memory capacity, and prospective drinking. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(1):105–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Woud ML, Fitzgerald DA, Wiers RW, Rinck M, Becker ES. ‘Getting into the spirit’: alcohol-related interpretation bias in heavy-drinking students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(3):627–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Woud ML, Hutschemaekers MH, Rinck M, Becker ES. The manipulation of alcohol-related interpretation biases by means of cognitive bias modification – interpretation (CBM-I). J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015. pii: S0005-7916(15)00031-2.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008;39(3):209–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8(1):101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction. 2011;106(9):1667–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;85:75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, Gallinat J, Bermpohl F. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013;229(1):187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105(2):279–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(3):322–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(4):490–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gladwin TE, Rinck M, Eberl C, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J, Wiers RW. Mediation of cognitive bias modification for alcohol addiction via stimulus-specific alcohol avoidance association. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(1):101–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wiers RW, Houben K, Fadardi JS, van Beek P, Rhemtulla M, Cox WM. Alcohol cognitive bias modification training for problem drinkers over the web. Addict Behav. 2015;40:21–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    van Deursen DS, Salemink E, Smit F, Kramer J, Wiers RW. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: protocol of a randomised controlled trial with a 2×2×2 factorial design. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:674.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Amir N, Kuckertz JM, Najmi S. The effect of modifying automatic action tendencies on overt avoidance behaviors. Emotion. 2013;13(3):478–84.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rinck M, Telli S, Kampmann IL, Woud ML, Kerstholt M, Te Velthuis S, Wittkowski M, Becker ES. Training approach-avoidance of smiling faces affects emotional vulnerability in socially anxious individuals. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:481.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Taylor CT, Amir N. Modifying automatic approach action tendencies in individuals with elevated social anxiety symptoms. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(9):529–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rapee RM, MacLeod C, Carpenter L, Gaston JE, Frei J, Peters L, Baillie AJ. Integrating cognitive bias modification into a standard cognitive behavioural treatment package for social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(4–5):207–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Boettcher J, Hasselrot J, Sund E, Andersson G, Carlbring P. Combining attention training with internet-based cognitive-behavioural self-help for social anxiety: a randomised controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther. 2014;43(1):34–48.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Shechner T, Rimon-Chakir A, Britton JC, Lotan D, Apter A, Bliese PD, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Attention bias modification treatment augmenting effects on cognitive behavioral therapy in children with anxiety: randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):61–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Emmelkamp PM. Attention bias modification: the Emperor’s new suit? BMC Med. 2012;10:63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Clarke PJ, Notebaert L, MacLeod C. Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206(1):7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hallion LS, Ruscio AM. A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(6):940–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Linetzky M, Pergamin-Hight L, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2015;32(6):383–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;116(1–3):132–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Houben K, Havermans RC, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Beer à no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition. Addiction. 2012;107(7):1280–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IF, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DH, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109(1–3):30–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Houben K, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Getting a grip on drinking behavior: training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(7):968–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C. Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(3):260–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(3):426–32.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Thush C, Wiers RW, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1–3):116–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WA. Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction. 2012;107(11):1939–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Peeters M, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot RA, Janssen T, Vollebergh WA, Wiers RW. Automatic processes and the drinking behavior in early adolescence: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(10):1737–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Salemink E, Wiers RW. Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: the moderating role of regulatory control. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(1):40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Zvielli A, Bernstein A, Koster EH. Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Beard C, Weisberg RB, Primack J. Socially anxious primary care patients’ attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): a qualitative study. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012;40(5):618–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Boffo M, Pronk T, Mannarini S, Wiers RW. Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Trials. 2015;16:63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Notebaert L, Clarke PJ, Grafton B, MacLeod C. Validation of a novel attentional bias modification task: the future may be in the cards. Behav Res Ther. 2015;65:93–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Boendermaker WJ, Prins PJ, Wiers RW. Cognitive Bias Modification for adolescents with substance use problems – Can serious games help? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Payne HE, Lister C, West JH, Bernhardt JM. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e20.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Donker T, Petrie K, Proudfoot J, Clarke J, Birch MR, Christensen H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e247.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Enock PM, Hofmann SG, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification training via smartphone to reduce social anxiety: a randomized, controlled multi-session experiment. Cogn Ther Res. 2014;38(2):200–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Kerst WF, Waters AJ. Attentional retraining administered in the field reduces smokers’ attentional bias and craving. Health Psychol. 2014;33(10):1232–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthijs Blankers
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Elske Salemink
    • 4
  • Reinout W. Wiers
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ResearchArkin Mental Health CareAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Drug MonitoringTrimbos-institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and AddictionUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryAcademic Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT)-Lab, Department of PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations