Advertisement

Building a Reliable and Affordable System of Medical Care

  • Lawrence L. WeedEmail author
  • Lincoln Weed
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

In this critical review of our approach to medical education, medical practice and decision-making in medicine, the authors draw upon the disciplined thinking of Francis Bacon (mid 1600s), Battista Morgagni (late 1700s), and others to advocate for recognition of the limitations of the human mind as applied in the way medical learning is imparted and the way physicians practice. The authors outline how medical students acquire scientific knowledge, but not scientific behaviors. A scientific approach to diagnosis begins with using information tools to identify all diagnostic possibilities for the presenting problem and the initial findings needed to determine which possibilities are worth investigating in the patient. If the initial findings do not reveal a clear diagnostic solution, then information tools must be employed as part of a system of care to enforce highly organized follow-up processes, that is, careful problem definition, planning, execution, feedback, and corrective action over time, all documented under strict standards of care for managing the complexities involved.

Keywords

Intellectual behaviors of modern science Transforming medical education Fallacies in medical decision-making Medical error/diagnostic failures Clinical decision-making technology Knowledge development system Individualized healthcare delivery Patient’s problem oriented medical record 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Chris Weed’s assistance in the planning and preparation of this paper and to thank him for all his support in his editorial reviews of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen M. How many die from medical mistakes in U.S. hospitals? 2013. ProPublica, 19 Sep. Accessed 20 Jan 2014: http://www.propublica.org/article/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-us-hospitals.
  2. 2.
    Bacon F. Novum organum, 1620; ed. by Joseph Devey, M.A. (New York: P.F. Collier, 1902). Available at: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1432. Accessed 19 July 2015.
  3. 3.
    Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada. Pittsburg: Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching; 1910.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markham B (1942) West with the Night. Berkeley: North Point PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgagni, GB. De Sedibus et Causis Morborum per Anatomen Indagatis (The seats and causes of diseases investigated by anatomy. Published in Italy. 1761. Available at: https://archive.org/details/seatscausesofdis02morg. Accessed 19 July 2015.
  6. 6.
    Weed LL. Medical records, medical education, and patient care. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press; 1969, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weed LL, Weed L. Diagnosing diagnostic failure. Diagnosis. 2014;1(1):13–7. doi: 10.1515/dx-2013-0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weed LL, Weed L. Medicine in denial. 2011. Charleston: CreateSpace. Table of contents, overview and introduction available at: http://www.thepermanentejournal.org/files/MedicineInDenial.pdf. Available for purchase at: Amazon.com or www.createspace.com/3508751.
  9. 9.
    Weed LL, Abbey LM, Bartholomew KA, et al. Knowledge coupling: new premises and new tools for medical care and education, Computers in Health Care series. New York: Springer; 1991. Chapter 13, pp. 235–277.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitehead AN. An introduction to mathematics; 1911. Project Gutenberg at: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/41568/41568-pdf.pdf. Available in paperback edition 2009 from Bibliobazaar.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of VermontUnderhillUSA
  2. 2.Axiom Resource Management Inc.OaktonUSA

Personalised recommendations