Advertisement

Analyzing Collaborative Reflection Support: A Content Analysis Approach

  • Michael PrillaEmail author
  • Alexander Nolte
  • Oliver Blunk
  • Dennis Liedtke
  • Bettina Renner
Conference paper

Abstract

Collaborative reflection helps groups to learn from work experiences for future work. Although its potential has been recognized and initial work is available, insights on how tools support people in collaborative reflection at work are scarce. We present an approach to analyze collaborative reflection support based on content analysis and an initial study in which it was applied to four cases of using a tool for collaborative reflection. From this we derive design suggestions such as levels of support for different groups and support for the creation of results from collaborative reflection. Our work contributes to CSCW by showing how tools can foster collaborative reflection at work.

Keywords

Experience Report Support Level Reflection Process Hospital Case Initial Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978): Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. UK: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, D. F. (2010). Enhancing group decision making: An exercise to reduce shared information bias. Journal of Management Education, 34(2), 249–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannon, L., & Schmidt, K. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1), 7–40.Google Scholar
  4. Baumer, E. P., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Sosik, V. S., & Gay, G. K. (2014): Reviewing reflection: On the use of reflection in interactive system design. In Proceedings of DIS 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Bjørn, P., & Boulus, N. (2011). Dissenting in reflective conversations: Critical components of doing action research. Action Research, 9(3), 282–302. doi: 10.1177/1476750310396949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boud, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  7. Boud, D., Cressey, P., & Docherty, P. (2006). Productive reflection at work: Learning for changing organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Crowston, K., & Kammerer, E. E. (1998). Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems Journal, 37(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daudelin, M. W. (1996). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics, 24(3), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, E. A. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Groot, E., Endedijk, M. D., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Simons, P. R.-J., & van Beukelen, P. (2013). Critically reflective dialogues in learning communities of professionals. Studies in Continuing Education, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2013.779240
  12. Dennis, A. R., George, J. F., Jessup, L. M., Nunamaker, J. F, Jr, & Vogel, D. R. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In Handbook of affective sciences (Vol. 572, pp. V595).Google Scholar
  14. Fleck, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2010). Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, OZCHI’10 (pp. 216–223). Brisbane, Australia: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1952222.1952269.
  15. Greenwood, J. (1998). The role of reflection in single and double loop learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(5), 1048–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoyrup, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 442–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Introne, J. E., & Drescher, M. (2013). Analyzing the flow of knowledge in computer mediated teams. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 341–356). ACM.Google Scholar
  19. Isaacs, E., Konrad, A., Walendowski, A., Lennig, T., Hollis, V., & Whittaker, S. (2013). Echoes from the past: how technology mediated reflection improves well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’13 (pp. 1071–1080). Paris, France: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2470654.2466137
  20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Lockhorst, D., Admiraal, W., Pilot, A., & Veen, W. (2003). Analysis of electronic communication using 5 different perspectives.Google Scholar
  22. Marcu, G., Dey, A. K., & Kiesler, S. (2014). Designing for collaborative reflection. In Proceedings of PervasiveHealth’14.Google Scholar
  23. Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56–77.Google Scholar
  25. Porges, Z., Yang, X., Desai, A., Ho, C., Pallegedara, R., Razzaque, R. et al. (2014). Achieve: Evaluating the impact of progress logging and social feedback on goal achievement. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW Companion’14 (pp. 221–224). Baltimore, Maryland, USA: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2556420.2556498
  26. Power, D. J., & Sharda, R. (2009). Decision support systems. In Springer handbook of automation (pp. 1539–1548). Berlin: :Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Prilla, M. (2014). User and group behavior in computer support for collaborative reflection in practice: An explorative data analysis’. In C. Rossitto, L. Ciolfi, D. Martin, & B. Conein (Eds.), COOP 2014—Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Prilla, M., Pammer, V., & Krogstie, B. (2013). Fostering collaborative redesign of work practice: Challenges for tools supporting reflection at work. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2013).Google Scholar
  29. Prilla, M., & Renner, B. (2014). Supporting collaborative reflection at work: A comparative case analysis. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Group Work (GROUP 2014). ACM.Google Scholar
  30. Prinz, W., & Zaman, B. (2005). Proactive support for the organization of shared workspaces using activity patterns and content analysis. In Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 246–255). ACM.Google Scholar
  31. Raelin, J. A. (2002). I don’t have time to think! versus the art of reflective practice. Reflections, 4(1), 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds, M. (1999). Critical reflection and management education: rehabilitating less hierarchical approaches. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, S. G. (2010). Enhancing reflection skills through learning portfolios: An empirical test. Journal of Management Education, 34(3), 430–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tigelaar, D., Dolmans, D., Meijer, P., de Grave, W., & van der Vleuten, C. (2008). Teachers’ interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during peer meetings. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Woerkom, M., & Croon, M. (2008). Operationalising critically reflective work behaviour. Personnel Review, 37(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vince, R. (2002). Organizing reflection. Management Learning, 33(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Wever, B. D., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Keer, H. V. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46(1), 6–28. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu, E. (1996). Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Coventions of the Association for Education Communications and Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Prilla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander Nolte
    • 1
  • Oliver Blunk
    • 1
  • Dennis Liedtke
    • 1
  • Bettina Renner
    • 2
  1. 1.Ruhr-University of BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institut für WissensmedienTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations