Advertisement

Diagnostic Features Modeling for Decision Boundaries Calculation for Maintenance of Gearboxes Used in Belt Conveyor System

  • Paweł K. StefaniakEmail author
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
  • Radoslaw Zimroz
  • Walter Bartelmus
  • Monika Hardygóra
Conference paper
Part of the Applied Condition Monitoring book series (ACM, volume 4)

Abstract

Condition-Based maintenance (CBM) becomes more and more popular in industry. The idea is simple: measure raw data (vibrations, temperatures, etc.), extract features and make a right decisions regarding replacement of the whole machine or its component at appropriate time. Right decision might mean simple if-then-else rule or complex decision making scheme using multidimensional data. In any case mentioned rules require definition of appropriate thresholds for diagnostic parameters (i.e. decision boundaries). This is a key problem in CBM. The article presents the procedure for determining decision thresholds based on statistical modeling of diagnostic data. In the presented procedure first we fit the suitable distribution (Weibull) to data set for each gearbox. Next we calculate the fitting quality measure and select the distribution parameters for well fitted data. Finally, on the basis of the multidimensional analysis of those parameters we determine threshold values for the effective identification of the machines’ condition and their components. It might be interpreted as training process of diagnostic system. From this phase of the procedure we can obtain thresholds for warning and alarm statuses and they can be used for classification of rest of the data (that did not pass modeling phase). Proposed procedure has been applied to relatively large diagnostic data set that covers nearly 150 measurements acquired during several years in underground mine. The data describes gearboxes in different conditions—from nearly new or after repair to seriously damaged/worn just before failure.

Keywords

Belt conveyor Decision making Maintenance Weibull distribution Diagnostics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the statutory grant No. B40037 (P. Stefaniak).

References

  1. 1.
    Bartelmus W (2001) Mathematical modelling and computer simulations as an aid to gearbox diagnostics. Mech Syst Sig Process 15(5):855–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartelmus W, Chaari F, Zimroz R, Haddar M (2010) Modelling of gearbox dynamics under time-varying non-stationary load for distributed fault detection and diagnosis. Eur J Mech A Solids 29(4):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartelmus W (1992) Mach Vibr 1:178–189Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartelmus W, Zimroz R (2009) A new feature for monitoring the condition of gearboxes in non-stationary operating conditions. Mech Syst Sig Process 23(5):1528–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks R, Thorpe R, Wilson J (2004) A new method for defining and managing process alarms and for correcting process operation when an alarm occurs. J Hazard Mater 115:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cempel C (1990) Limit value in practice of vibration diagnosis. Mech Syst Sig Process 4(6):483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cizek P, Härdle WK, Weron R (2005) Statistical tools for finance and insurance. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dybała J, Radkowski S (2007) Geometrical method of selection of features of diagnostic signals. Mech Syst Sig Process 21(2):761–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dybała J (2013) Vibrodiagnostics of gearboxes using NBV-based classifier: a pattern recognition approach. Mech Syst Sig Process 38(1):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galar D, Gustafson A, Tormos B, Berges L (2012) Maintenance decision making based on different types of data fusion. Eksploatacja I Niezawodnosc—Maintenance Reliab 14(2):135–144Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jablonski A, Barszcz T, Bielecka M, Breuhaus P (2013) Modeling of probability distribution functions for automatic threshold calculation in condition monitoring systems. Measurement 46(1):727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lodewijks G (2004) Strategies for automated maintenance of belt conveyor systems. Bulk Solids Handling 24(1):16–22Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stefaniak PK, Wyłomańska A, Obuchowski J, Zimroz R (2015) Procedures for decision thresholds finding in maintenance management of belt conveyor system—statistical modeling of diagnostic data. Proceedings of the 12th international symposium continuous surface mining—Aachen 2014. Lecture notes in production engineering 2015, pp 391–402Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stefaniak PK, Zimroz R, Bartelmus W, Hardygóra M (2014) Computerised decision-making support system based on data fusion for machinery system’s management and maintenance. Appl Mech Mater 683:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimroz R, Bartelmus W, Barszcz T, Urbanek J (2012) Wind turbine main bearing diagnosis—a proposal of data processing and decision making procedure under non stationary load condition. Key Eng Mater 518:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimroz R, Bartelmus W, Barszcz T, Urbanek J (2014) Diagnostics of bearings in presence of strong operating conditions non-stationarity—a procedure of load-dependent features processing with application to wind turbine bearings. Mech Syst Sig Process 46(1):16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zimroz R, Bartkowiak A (2013) Two simple multivariate procedures for monitoring planetary gearboxes in non-stationary operating conditions. Mech Syst Sig Process 38(1):237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimroz R, Stefaniak P, Bartelmus W, Hardygóra M (2015) Novel techniques of diagnostic data processing for belt conveyor maintenance. Proceedings of the 12th international symposium continuous surface mining—Aachen 2014. Lecture notes in production engineering 2015, pp 31–40Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim CKR, Mba D (2014) Switching Kalman filter for failure prognostic. Mech Syst Sig Process. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.006i
  21. 21.
    Raad A, Antoni J, Sidahmed M (2008) Indicators of cyclostationarity: theory and application to gear fault monitoring. Mech Syst Sig Process 22(3):574–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stefaniak PK, Zimroz R, Krol R, Gorniak-Zimroz J, Bartelmus W, Hardygora M (2012) Some remarks on using condition monitoring for spatially distributed mechanical system belt conveyor network in underground mine—a case study condition monitoring of machinery in non-stationary operations: proceedings of the second international conference. Condition monitoring of machinery in non-stationary operations. CMMNO’ 2012/ed. TaharFakhfakh [i in.] Springer, pp 497–507Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 18(3):293–297zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paweł K. Stefaniak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnieszka Wyłomańska
    • 1
  • Radoslaw Zimroz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Walter Bartelmus
    • 1
  • Monika Hardygóra
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Wroclaw University of TechnologyWrocławPoland
  2. 2.KGHM Cuprum R&DWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations