Load Shifting, Interrupting or Both? Customer Portfolio Composition in Demand Side Management

  • Johannes Gärttner
  • Christoph M. Flath
  • Christof Weinhardt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 682)

Abstract

The share of renewable power sources in the electricity generation mix has seen enormous growth in recent years. Generation from fluctuating renewable energy sources (Wind, Solar) has to be considered stochastic and not (fully) controllable. To align demand with volatile supply, balancing and storage capacities have to be increased. To avoid high costs of storage investments, we suggest exploiting demand side flexibility instead. This can be operationalized through scheduling of electrical loads. Prior research typically assumes that both the set of customers, as well as the flexibility endowments of the scheduling problem, are exogenously given. However, the quality of the scheduling result highly depends on the composition of the customer portfolio. Therefore, it should be designed in an optimal fashion. This includes two decisions: which customers should be part of the portfolio and how much flexibility each customer should offer. Thus, future energy retailers face a complicated decision-making problem.We present a portfolio design optimization model which includes both selecting customers to be part of the portfolio and scheduling their flexibility. Furthermore, we present exemplary results from a scenario based on empirical load and generation data.

References

  1. 1.
    Baldick, R., Kolos, S., Tompaidis, S.: Interruptible electricity contracts from an electricity retailer’s point of view: valuation and optimal interruption. Oper. Res. 54(4), 627–642 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carpaneto, E., Chicco, G.: Probabilistic characterisation of the aggregated residential load patterns. Gener. Transm. Distrib. IET 2(3), 373–382 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deng, S.J., Xu, L.: Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources. Energy 34(10), 1523–1529 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flath, C.M.: Flexible demand in smart grids-modeling and coordination. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEA: The power of transformation - wind, sun and the economics of flexible power systems. International Energy Agency, Paris (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parvania, M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.: Demand response scheduling by stochastic scuc. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 1(1), 89–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strbac, G.: Demand side management: benefits and challenges. Energy Policy 36(12), 4419–4426 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Subramanian, A., Garcia, M., Dominguez-Garcia, A., Callaway, D., Poolla, K., Varaiya, P.: Real-time scheduling of deferrable electric loads. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2012, pp. 3643–3650. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Subramanian, A., Garcia, M.J., Callaway, D.S., Poolla, K., Varaiya, P.: Real-time scheduling of distributed resources. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4(4), 2122–2130 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valero, S., Ortiz, M., Senabre, C., Alvarez, C., Franco, F., Gabaldon, A.: Methods for customer and demand response policies selection in new electricity markets. Gener. Transm. Distrib. IET 1(1), 104–110 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Gärttner
    • 1
  • Christoph M. Flath
    • 2
  • Christof Weinhardt
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Process Engineering (IPE)FZI Research Center for Information TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Information Systems and Marketing (IISM)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations