Advertisement

Automatic LV Feature Detection and Blood-Pool Tracking from Multi-plane TEE Time Series

  • Shusil Dangi
  • Yehuda K. Ben-Zikri
  • Yechiel Lamash
  • Karl Q. Schwarz
  • Cristian A. LinteEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9126)

Abstract

Multi-plane, 2D TEE images constitute the clinical standard of care for assessment of left ventricle function, as well as for guiding various minimally invasive procedure that rely on intra-operative imaging for real-time visualization. We propose a framework that enables automatic, rapid and accurate endocardial left ventricle feature identification and blood-pool segmentation using a combination of image filtering, graph cut, non-rigid registration-based motion extraction, and 3D LV geometry reconstruction techniques applied to the TEE image series. We evaluate our proposed framework using several retrospective patient tri-plane TEE image sequences and demonstrate comparable results to those achieved by expert manual segmentation using clinical software.

Keywords

Left Ventricle Target Registration Error Volume Reconstruction Left Ventricle Volume Active Contour Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Nathan Cahill for sharing his technical expertise and Aditya Daryanani for his help with image segmentation. In addition, we acknowledge funding support from the Kate Gleason Research Fund and the RIT College of Engineering Faculty Development Grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Noble, J., Boukerroui, D.: Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(8), 987–1010 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mishra, A., Dutta, P., Ghosh, M.: A GA based approach for boundary detection of left ventricle with echocardiographic image sequences. Image Vis. Comput. 21(11), 967–976 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mignotte, M., Meunier, J.: A multiscale optimization approach for the dynamic contour-based boundary detection issue. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 25(3), 265–275 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernard, O., Friboulet, D., Thevenaz, P., Unser, M.: Variational B-spline level-set: a linear filtering approach for fast deformable model evolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18(6), 1179–1191 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cremers, D., Osher, S.J., Soatto, S.: Kernel density estimation and intrinsic alignment for shape priors in level set segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 69(3), 335–351 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., Graham, J.: Active shape models-their training and application. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 61(1), 38–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosch, J., Mitchell, S., Lelieveldt, B., Nijland, F., Kamp, O., Sonka, M., Reiber, J.: Automatic segmentation of echocardiographic sequences by active appearance motion models. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21(11), 1374–1383 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Georgescu, B., Zhou, X., Comaniciu, D., Gupta, A.: Database-guided segmentation of anatomical structures with complex appearance. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 2, pp. 429–436 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jyh Herng Wu, E., De Andrade, M.L., Nicolosi, D.E., Pontes Jr., S.C.: Artificial neural network: border detection in echocardiography. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46(9), 841–848 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mulet-Parada, M., Noble, J.A.: 2D + T acoustic boundary detection in echocardiography. Med. Image Anal. 4, 21–30 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., Zabih, R.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. PAMI 23, 1222–1239 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovesi, P.: Symmetry and asymmetry from local phase. In: Proceedings of 10th Australian Joint Conference Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2–4 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajpoot, K., Grau, V., Noble, J.A.: Local-phase based 3D boundary detection using monogenic signal and its application to real-time 3-D echocardiography images. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium Biomedical Imaging, pp. 783–786 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uzkent, B., Hoffman, M.J., Cherry, E., Cahill, N.: Processing IEEE western NY image signal process workshop, pp. 47–51 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamash, Y., Fischer, A., Carasso, S., Lessick, J.: Strain analysis from 4D cardiac CT image data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62, 511–521 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zitova, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 21, 977–1000 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, E.T.Y.: Choosing nodes in parametric curve interpolation. Comput. Aided Des. 21, 363–370 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H.: The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 22, 469–483 (1996)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shusil Dangi
    • 1
  • Yehuda K. Ben-Zikri
    • 1
  • Yechiel Lamash
    • 4
  • Karl Q. Schwarz
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cristian A. Linte
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging ScienceRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Biomedical EngineeringRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Division of EchocardiographyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Technion - Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations