Towards a Framework for Socially Influencing Systems: Meta-analysis of Four PLS-SEM Based Studies

  • Agnis StibeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9072)


People continuously experience various types of engagement through social media, mobile interaction, location-based applications, and other technologically advanced environments. Often, integral parts of such socio-technical contexts often are information systems designed to change behaviors and attitudes of their users by leveraging powers of social influence, further defined as socially influencing systems (SIS). Drawing upon socio-psychological theories, this paper initially reviews and presents a typology of relevant social influence aspects. Following that, it analyzes four partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) based empirical studies to examine the interconnectedness of their social influence aspects. As a result, the analysis provides grounds for seminal steps towards the development and advancement of a framework for designing and evaluating socially influencing systems. The main findings can also deepen understanding of how to effectively harness social influence for enhanced user engagement in socio-technical environments and guide persuasive engineering of future socially influencing systems.


Socially influencing systems Framework Persuasive technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Appleford, S., Bottum, J.R., Thatcher, J.B.: Understanding the Social Web: Towards Defining an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda for Information Systems. ACM SIGMIS Database 45(1), 29–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelrod, R.: On Six Advances in Cooperation Theory. Analyse & Kritik 22(1), 130–151 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura, A.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology 3(3), 265–299 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumeister, R.F.: The self. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 680–740. McGraw–Hill, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., Javier Sese, F.: Using Clickers in Class. The Role of Interactivity, Active Collaborative Learning and Engagement in Learning Performance. Computers Science Education 13(2), 137–172 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Stoltenberg, C.D.: Processes of Social Influence: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In: Kendall, P.C. (ed.) Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy, pp. 215–274. Academic Press, San Diego (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy Living with Persuasive Technologies: Framework, Issues, and Challenges. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(2), 171–178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng, Y., Liang, J., Leung, L.: Social Network Service Use on Mobile Devices: An Examination of Gratifications, Civic Attitudes and Civic Engagement in China. New Media & Society (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., Wang, E.T.: Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3), 1872–1888 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins e-books (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., Reno, R.R.: A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24(20), 1–243 (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crano, W.D., Prislin, R.: Attitudes and Persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57, 345–374 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deutsch, M.: A Theory of Cooperation-Competition and Beyond. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, vol. 2, p. 275 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deutsch, M., Gerard, H.B.: A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3), 629 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Festinger, L.: A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Firpo, D., Kasemvilas, S., Ractham, P., Zhang, X.: Generating a Sense of Community in a Graduate Educational Setting through Persuasive Technology. In: 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 41 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guerin, B., Innes, J.: Social Facilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science 1(1), 29–40 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hsu, C.L., Lin, J.C.C.: Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance, Social Influence and Knowledge Sharing Motivation. Information & Management 45(1), 65–74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lapinski, M.K., Rimal, R.N.: An Explication of Social Norms. Communication Theory 15(2), 127–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loock, C.M., Staake, T., Landwehr, J.: Green IS Design and Energy Conservation: An Empirical Investigation of Social Normative Feedback. In: International Conference on Information Systems, p. 10 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.: Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and Affective Process Analyses, pp. 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J.: Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix. Business Horizons 52(4), 357–365 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    May, M.A., Doob, L.W.: Cooperation and Competition. Social Science Research Council Bulletin, 125 (1937)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mead, M.: Cooperation and Competition among Primitive Peoples. McGraw-Hill, New York (1937)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moeller, S., Ciuchita, R., Mahr, D., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Fassnacht, M.: Uncovering Collaborative Value Creation Patterns and Establishing Corresponding Customer Roles. Journal of Service Research 16(4), 471–487 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mumford, E.: A Socio-Technical Approach to Systems Design. Requirements Engineering 5(2), 125–133 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mumm, J., Mutlu, B.: Designing Motivational Agents: The Role of Praise, Social Comparison, and Embodiment in Computer Feedback. Computers in Human Behavior 27(5), 1643–1650 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nambisan, S., Baron, R.A.: Virtual Customer Environments: Testing a Model of Voluntary Participation in Value Co-creation Activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(4), 388–406 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O’Keefe, D.J.: Theories of Persuasion. In: Nabi, R., Oliver, M.B. (eds.) Handbook of Media Processes and Effects. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: The New Frontier of Experience Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44(4), 12–18 (2003)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rashotte, L.: Social Influence. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology 9, 562–563 (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schoenau-Fog, H.: Teaching Serious Issues through Player Engagement in an Interactive Experiential Learning Scenario. Eludamos, Journal for Computer Game Culture 6(1), 53–70 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stibe, A.: Socially Influencing Systems: Persuading People to Engage with Publicly Displayed Twitter-based Systems. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stibe, A.: Advancing Typology of Computer-Supported Influence: Moderation Effects in Socially Influencing Systems. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) Persuasive Technology. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 251–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wills, T.A.: Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology. Psychological Bulletin 90(2), 245 (1981)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wilson, S.R., Benner, L.A.: The Effects of Self-Esteem and Situation upon Comparison Choices During Ability Evaluation. Sociometry, 381–397 (1971)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wood, J.V.: What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(5), 520–537 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D.: The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18(5), 459–482 (1908)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zajonc, R.B.: Social Facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MIT Media LabCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations