Advertisement

Adaptive Reminders for Safe Work

  • Matthias Hartwig
  • Philipp Scholl
  • Vanessa Budde
  • Armin Windel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9072)

Abstract

In working context, new information and communication systems like head-mounted displays are often established to increase productivity. However, new technology can also potentially assist users to increase their health and well-being by encouraging safe behaviour, as they offer rich potential for persuasive elements and are highly adaptive to the respective situation. A setup is presented that evaluates the persuasive effect of a head mounted display-based assistance system on safe behaviour during a task in a laboratory simulation. In a randomised experimental design, the results show that the persuasive assistance system led to a significant and substantial reduction of safety violations compared to a traditionally designed warning sign. The findings suggest to design reminders not only according to ergonomic aspects, but also to consider persuasive effects on behavior. Furthermore, the results highlight the opportunities of mobile devices for assisting healthy behaviour in working environments.

Keywords

Head mounted display Occupational safety Laboratory safety Assistance system Persuasive technology Anthropomorphic agent 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rolland, J.P., Thompson, K.P., Urey, H., Thomas, M.: See-Through Head Worn Display (HWD) Architectures. In: Chen, J., Cranton, W., Fihn, M. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Display Technology. LNCS, pp. 2145–2170. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Theis, S., Alexander, T., Mayer, M.p., Wille, M.: Considering ergonomic aspects of head-mounted displays for applications in industrial manufacturing. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2013 and DHM 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8026, pp. 282–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiser, M.: The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, 66–75 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aarts, E.H.L., Harwig, H., Schuurmans, M.: Ambient Intelligence. In: Denning, J. (ed.) The Invisible Future, pp. 235–250. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Windel, A., Hartwig, M.: New Forms of Work Assistance by Ambient Intelligence. In: Paternò, F., de Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Santoro, C., van Loenen, E., Luyten, K. (eds.) AmI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7683, pp. 348–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Pakkanen, T.: Do Persuasive Technologies Persuade? - A Review of Empirical Studies. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 118–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Boer, J., Teeuw, W.B., Heylen, D.K.J.: Applying the Behaviour Grid for Improving Safety in Industrial Environments. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings, p. 6. CEUR, Sydney (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang-Kennedy, L.: Persuading Secure User Behaviour at ork. In: 9th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2014, Padua, Italy, pp. 127–129 (2014) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulman, D., Bickmore, T.: Persuading users through counseling dialogue with a conversational agent. In: Persuasive 2009 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartwig, M., Windel, A.: Safety and Health at Work through Persuasive Assistance Systems. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2013 and DHM 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8026, pp. 40–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Hartwig
    • 1
  • Philipp Scholl
    • 2
  • Vanessa Budde
    • 1
  • Armin Windel
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Technical University DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations