Advertisement

Rural School Location and Student Allocation

  • Ricardo GiesenEmail author
  • Paulo Rocha E Oliveira
  • Vladimir Marianov
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 232)

Abstract

Optimizing school location can dramatically improve the quality of life of a large number of children, especially of those in rural areas in developing countries. Moreover, when transportation costs are considered, improving the location and assignment of student to schools can save important resources that can be used to provide better teaching supplies to the students. We review selected literature on school location and present an application in Brazil as well as overview some experiences in Chile.

Keywords

Transportation Cost School System Travel Distance School Location School Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Giesen and Oliveira gratefully acknowledge partial support by the Instituto Alfa e Beto, Brazil. Marianov gratefully acknowledges partial support by the Institute Complex Engineering Systems through Grants ICM MIDEPLAN P-05-004-F and CONICYT FBO16.

References

  1. Antunes A, Peeters D (2000) A dynamic optimization model for school network planning. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 34(2):101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araya F, Dell R, Donoso P, Marianov V, Martínez F, Weintraub A (2012) Optimizing location and size of rural schools in Chile. Int Transa Oper Res 19(5):695–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcelos FB, Pizzolato ND, Lorena AN (2003) Localização de escolas do ensino fundamental com modelos capacitado e não-capacitado: caso de Vitória/es. Pesqui Operacion 24(1):133–149Google Scholar
  4. Caro F, Shirabe T, Guignard M, Weintraub A (2004) School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming. J Oper Res Soc 55(8):836–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Church RL, Murray AT (1993) Modeling school utilization and consolidation. J Urban Plann Dev 119:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond JT, Wright JR (1987) Multiobjective analysis of public school consolidation. J Urban Plann Dev 113(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin AD, Koenigsberg E (1973) Computed school assignments in a large district. Oper Res 21(2):413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lemberg DS, Church RL (2000) The school boundary stability problem over time. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 34(3):159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liggett RS (1973) The application of an implicit enumeration algorithm to the school desegregation problem. Manage Sci 20(2):159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mandujano P, Giesen R, Ferrer J-C (2012) An optimization model for location of schools and student transportation in rural areas. Transp Res Rec 2283:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martínez F, Tamblay L, Weintraub A (2011) School locations and vacancies: a constrained logit equilibrium model. Environ Plan A 43:1853–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pizzolato ND (1994) A heuristic for large-size p-median location problems with application to school location. Ann Oper Res 50(1):473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pizzolato ND, Fraga da Silva HB (1997) The location of public schools: evaluation of practical experiences. Int Trans Oper Res 4(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pizzolato ND, Barcelos FB, Lorena NAL (2004) School location methodology in urban areas of developing countries. Int Trans Oper Res 11(6):667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutcliffe C, Boardman J, Cheshire P (1984) Goal programming and allocating children to secondary schools in Reading. J Oper Res Soc 35(8):719–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teixeira JC, Antunes AP (2008) A hierarchical location model for public facility planning. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Toregas C, Swain R, ReVelle C, Bergman L (1971) The location of emergency service facilities. Oper Res 19(6):1363–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. White F, Tweeten L (1973) Optimal school district size emphasizing rural areas. Amer J Agr Econ 55(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Giesen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paulo Rocha E Oliveira
    • 2
  • Vladimir Marianov
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Transport Engineering and LogisticsPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.IESE Business SchoolUniversity of NavarraPamplonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations