International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization

UMAP 2015: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization pp 370-376 | Cite as

Integrating Context Similarity with Sparse Linear Recommendation Model

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9146)

Abstract

Context-aware recommender systems extend traditional recommender systems by adapting their output to users’ specific contextual situations. Most of the existing approaches to context-aware recommendation involve directly incorporating context into standard recommendation algorithms (e.g., collaborative filtering, matrix factorization). In this paper, we highlight the importance of context similarity and make the attempt to incorporate it into context-aware recommender. The underlying assumption behind is that the recommendation lists should be similar if their contextual situations are similar. We integrate context similarity with sparse linear recommendation model to build a similarity-learning model. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed model is able to outperform several state-of-the-art context-aware recommendation algorithms for the top-N recommendation task.

Keywords

Context Context-aware recommendation Context similarity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adomavicius, G., Mobasher, B., Ricci, F., Tuzhilin, A.: Context-aware recommender systems. AI Magazine 32(3), 67–80 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baltrunas, L., Ludwig, B., Ricci, F.: Matrix factorization techniques for context aware recommendation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 301–304. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karatzoglou, A., Amatriain, X., Baltrunas, L., Oliver, N.: Multiverse recommendation: n-dimensional tensor factorization for context-aware collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 79–86. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ning, X., Karypis, G.: SLIM: sparse linear methods for top-n recommender systems. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 497–506. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng, Y., Burke, R., Mobasher, B.: Recommendation with differential context weighting. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds.) UMAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7899, pp. 152–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, Y., Burke, R., Mobasher, B.: Splitting approaches for context-aware recommendation: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 274–279. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zheng, Y., Mobasher, B., Burke, R.: Deviation-based contextual SLIM recommenders. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 271–280. ACM (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing, Center for Web IntelligenceDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations