Measuring Asymmetric Interactions in Resting State Brain Networks

  • Anand A. Joshi
  • Ronald Salloum
  • Chitresh Bhushan
  • Richard M. Leahy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9123)

Abstract

Directed graph representations of brain networks are increasingly being used to indicate the direction and level of influence among brain regions. Most of the existing techniques for directed graph representations are based on time series analysis and the concept of causality, and use time lag information in the brain signals. These time lag-based techniques can be inadequate for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal analysis due to the limited time resolution of fMRI as well as the low frequency hemodynamic response. The aim of this paper is to present a novel measure of necessity that uses asymmetry in the joint distribution of brain activations to infer the direction and level of interaction among brain regions. We present a mathematical formula for computing necessity and extend this measure to partial necessity, which can potentially distinguish between direct and indirect interactions. These measures do not depend on time lag for directed modeling of brain interactions and therefore are more suitable for fMRI signal analysis. The necessity measures were used to analyze resting state fMRI data to determine the presence of hierarchy and asymmetry of brain interactions during resting state. We performed ROI-wise analysis using the proposed necessity measures to study the default mode network. The empirical joint distribution of the fMRI signals was determined using kernel density estimation, and was used for computation of the necessity and partial necessity measures. The significance of these measures was determined using a one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the posterior cingulate cortex plays a central role in the default mode network.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamini, Y., Yekutieli, D.: The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29(4), 1165–1188 (2001)MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burge, J., Lane, T., Link, H., Qiu, S., Clark, V.P.: Discrete dynamic Bayesian network analysis of fMRI data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30(1), 122–137 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fransson, P., Marrelec, G.: The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: evidence from a partial correlation network analysis. NeuroImage 42(3), 1178–1184 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friston, K.J.: Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2(1–2), 56–78 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friston, K.J., Harrison, L., Penny, W.: Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 19(4), 1273–1302 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friston, K.J., Kahan, J., Biswal, B., Razi, A.: A DCM for resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 94, 396–407 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glasser, M.F., Sotiropoulos, S.N., Wilson, J.A., Coalson, T.S., Fischl, B., Andersson, J.L., Xu, J., Jbabdi, S., Webster, M., Polimeni, J.R., et al.: The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 80, 105–124 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray, A.G., Moore, A.W.: Very fast multivariate kernel density estimation via computational geometry. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meeting (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang, J.N., Lay, S.R., Lippman, A.: Nonparametric multivariate density estimation: a comparative study. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42(10), 2795–2810 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leech, R., Braga, R., Sharp, D.J.: Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex. J. Neurosci. 32(1), 215–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mclntosh, A., Gonzalez-Lima, F.: Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2(1–2), 2–22 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mill, J.S.: A system of logic: ratiocinative and Inductive. Green and Company, Longmans (1956)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mumford, J.A., Ramsey, J.D.: Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer. NeuroImage 86, 573–582 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel, R.S., Bowman, F.D., Rilling, J.K.: A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27(3), 267–276 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ragin, C.C.: Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., Goebel, R.: Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 25(1), 230–242 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, S.M., Beckmann, C.F., Andersson, J., Auerbach, E.J., Bijsterbosch, J., Douaud, G., Duff, E., Feinberg, D.A., Griffanti, L., Harms, M.P., et al.: Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage 80, 144–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, S.M., Miller, K.L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Webster, M., Beckmann, C.F., Nichols, T.E., Ramsey, J.D., Woolrich, M.W.: Network modelling methods for fMRI. NeuroImage 54(2), 875–891 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Essen, D.C., Smith, S.M., Barch, D.M., Behrens, T.E., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K.: The Wu-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. NeuroImage 80, 62–79 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu, X., Li, J., Yao, L.: Determining effective connectivity from fMRI data using a gaussian dynamic Bayesian network. In: Huang, T., Zeng, Z., Li, C., Leung, C.S. (eds.) ICONIP 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7663, pp. 33–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anand A. Joshi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ronald Salloum
    • 1
  • Chitresh Bhushan
    • 1
  • Richard M. Leahy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Signal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations