Towards Investigating Performance Differences in Clinical Reasoning in a Technology Rich Learning Environment

  • Tenzin Doleck
  • Amanda Jarrell
  • Eric Poitras
  • Susanne Lajoie
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9112)

Abstract

Technology Rich Learning Environments (TREs) are increasingly used to support scholastic activities. BioWorld is an example of a TRE designed to support the metacognitive activities of learners tasked with solving virtual patient cases. The present paper aims to examine the performance differences of novice physicians in diagnosing cases in BioWorld. We present an empirically guided line of research concerning the performance differences: (1) across three endocrinology cases, (2) between genders, (3) between goal orientations, and (4) in diagnosis correctness.

Keywords

Technology rich learning environments Clinical reasoning Performance differences Learner outcomes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Simmons, B.: Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(5), 1151–1158 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delany, C., Golding, C.: Teaching clinical reasoning by making thinking visible: an action research project with allied health clinical educators. BMC Medical Education 14(1), 20 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, G.: Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education 39(4), 418–427 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S., Noble, D., Norton, C., Roche, J., Hickey, N.: The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today 30(6), 515–520 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beal, C.R., Walles, R., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P.: On-line tutoring for math achievement testing: A controlled evaluation. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(1), 43–55 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsuda, N., Yarzebinski, E., Keiser, V., Raizada, R., William, W.C., Stylianides, G.J., Koedinger, K.R.: Cognitive anatomy of tutor learning: Lessons learned with SimStudent. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(4), 1152–1163 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanlehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: The Andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15, 147–204 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naismith, L.: Examining motivational and emotional influences on medical students’ attention to feedback in a technology-rich environment for learning clinical reasoning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Canada (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gauthier, G., Lajoie, P.S., Naismith, L., Wiseman, J.: Using expert decision maps to promote reflection and self-assessment in medical case-based instruction. In: Proceedings of Workshop on the Assessment & Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains at ITS, Montréal, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lajoie, S.P.: Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: examples from avionics and medicine. In: Ericsson, K.A. (ed.) Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments, pp. 61–83. Cambridge University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lajoie, S.P., Poitras, E. G., Doleck, T., Jarrell, A.: modeling metacognitive activities in medical problem-solving with bioworld. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Metacognition: Fundamentals, Applications, and Trends, pp. 323–343. Springer (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tenzin Doleck
    • 1
  • Amanda Jarrell
    • 1
  • Eric Poitras
    • 2
  • Susanne Lajoie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational and Counselling PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations