Advertisement

Steps Towards the Gamification of Collaborative Learning Scenarios Supported by Ontologies

  • Geiser Chalco ChallcoEmail author
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
  • Ig Ibert Bittencourt
  • Seiji Isotani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9112)

Abstract

The Computer-Support Collaborative Learning (CSCL) script is an effective approach to support meaningful interactions and better learning. Unfortunately, in some situations, scripted collaboration demotivates students, which makes more difficult its use over time. To deal with this problem, we propose the use of gamification to positively change learners’ motivation and engagement. Nevertheless, the adequate application of gamification is a complex task that requires deeper knowledge about game design and their impact on collaborative learning (CL). Thus, we develop an ontology called OntoGaCLeS to provide a formal systematization of the knowledge about gamification and its correct application. In this paper, we focus in the formalization of concepts relate to gamification as persuasive technology.

Keywords

Ontology Gamification Collaborative learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Challco, G.C., Moreira, D., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: Towards an ontology for gamifying collaborative learning scenarios. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 404–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Challco, G.C., Moreira, D.A., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: An ontology engineering approach to gamify collaborative learning scenarios. In: Baloian, N., Burstein, F., Ogata, H., Santoro, F., Zurita, G. (eds.) CRIWG 2014. LNCS, vol. 8658, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falout, J., Elwood, J., Hood, M.: Demotivation: Affective states and learning outcomes. System 37(3), 403–417 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogg, B.: A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive 2009, pp. 40:1–40:7. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3025–3034. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. AAAI Press, San Jose (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4(4), 445–478 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: Hozo: an environment for building/using ontologies based on a fundamental consideration of “role” and “relationship”. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 213–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mäyrä, F., Ermi, L.: Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005: Changing Views-Worlds in Play (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sicart, M.: Defining game mechanics. Game Studies 8(2), 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staddon, J.E.R., Cerutti, D.T.: Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology 54(1), 115–144 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webb, E.N.: Gamification: when it works, when it doesn’t. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 608–614. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geiser Chalco Challco
    • 1
    Email author
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
    • 2
  • Ig Ibert Bittencourt
    • 3
  • Seiji Isotani
    • 1
  1. 1.University of São Paulo, ICMCSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Japan Institute of Science and TechnologyIshikawaJapan
  3. 3.Federal University of AlagoasMaceioBrazil

Personalised recommendations