Mind Wandering During Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System
Mind wandering (zoning out) can be detrimental to learning outcomes in a host of educational activities, from reading to watching video lectures, yet it has received little attention in the field of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). In the current study, participants self-reported mind wandering during a learning session with Guru, a dialogue-based ITS for biology. On average, participants interacted with Guru for 22 minutes and reported an average of 11.5 instances of mind wandering, or one instance every two minutes. The frequency of mind wandering was compared across five different phases of Guru (Common-Ground-Building Instruction, Intermittent Summary, Concept Map, Scaffolded Dialogue, and Cloze task), each requiring different learning strategies. The rate of mind wandering per minute was highest during the Common-Ground-Building Instruction and Scaffolded Dialogue phases of Guru. Importantly, there was significant negative correlation between mind wandering and learning, highlighting the need to address this phenomena during learning with ITSs.
KeywordsMind wandering Intelligent tutoring Engagement Attention
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Baker, R.S.J.: Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1059–1068 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: When Does Disengagement Correlate with Performance in Spoken Dialog Computer Tutoring? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 22, 39–58 (2013)Google Scholar
- 5.Baker, R.S.J., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 223–241 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Beck, J.E.: Using response times to model student disengagement. In: Proceedings of the ITS2004 Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, pp. 13–20 (2004)Google Scholar
- 10.Szpunar, K.K., Moulton, S.T., Schacter, D.L.: Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Olney, A., D’Mello, S., Risko, E.F., Graesser, A.C.: Attention in educational contexts: the role of the learning task in guiding attention. In: Fawcett, J., Risko, E.F., Kingstone, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Attention. MI Press, Cambridge, MA, (in press)Google Scholar
- 16.Sousa, T.L.V., Carriere, J.S., Smilek, D.: The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013)Google Scholar
- 20.Olney, A., Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C.: Guru: designing a conversational expert intelligent tutoring system. Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing: Issues and Approaches, pp. 156–171 (2012)Google Scholar
- 21.Olney, A.M., D’Mello, S., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., Graesser, A.: Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 256–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Feng, S., D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.C.: Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic bulletin & review 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
- 25.Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Toward fully automated person-independent detection of mind wandering. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar