Learning to Diagnose a Virtual Patient: an Investigation of Cognitive Errors in Medical Problem Solving

  • Amanda Jarrell
  • Tenzin Doleck
  • Eric Poitras
  • Susanne Lajoie
  • Tara Tressel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9112)

Abstract

Although cognitive errors (i.e., premature closure, faulty data gathering, and faulty knowledge) are the main reasons for making diagnostic mistakes, the mechanisms by which they occur are difficult to isolate in clinical settings. Computer-based learning environments (CBLE) offer the opportunity to train medical students to avoid cognitive errors by tracking the onset of these errors. The purpose of this study is to explore cognitive errors in a CBLE called BioWorld. A logistic regression was fitted to learner behaviors that characterize premature closure in order to predict diagnostic performance. An ANOVA was used to assess if participants who were highly confident in their wrong diagnosis engaged in more faulty data gathering via confirmation bias. Findings suggest that diagnostic mistakes can be predicted from faulty knowledge and faulty data gathering and indicate poor metacognitive awareness. This study supports the notion that to improve diagnostic performance medical education programs should promote metacognitive skills.

Keywords

Cognitive errors Metacognition Computer-based learning environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Elstein, A.S., Schwartz, A.: Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions, pp. 49–59. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartlett, E.E.: Physicians’ cognitive errors and their liability consequences. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 18(4), 62–69 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graber, M.L., Franklin, N., Gordon, R.: Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine 165(13), 1493–1499 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norman, G.R., Eva, K.W.: Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Medical Education 44(1), 94–100 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Podbregar, M., Voga, G., Krivec, B., Skale, R., Parežnik, R., Gabršček, L.: Should we confirm our clinical diagnostic certainty by autopsies? Intensive Care Medicine 27(11), 1750–1755 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lajoie, S.: Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship mode. In: Development of professional expertise, Cambridge, UK, pp. 61–83 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berner, E.S., Graber, M.L.: Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error inmedicine. The American Journal of Medicine 121(5), S2–S23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azevedo, R., Feyzi-Behnagh, R.: Dysregulated learning with advanced learning technologies. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational SystemsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Croskerry, P.: The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine 78(8), 775–780 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lajoie, S.P., Poitras, E.G., Doleck, T., Jarrell, A.: Modeling metacognitive activities in medical problem-solving with BioWorld. In: Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends, pp. 323–343. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lajoie, S., Naismith, L., Poitras, E., Hong, Y., Panesso-Cruz, I., Ranelluci, J., Wiseman, J.: Technology rich tools to support self-regulated learning and performance in medicine. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naismith, L.: Examining motivational and emotional influences on medical students’ attention to feedback in a technology-rich environment for learning clinical reasoning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Canada (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K.E. et al.: Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Barchfeld, P., Perry, R.P.: Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 36–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gauthier, G., Lajoie, P.S., Naismith, L., Wiseman, J.: Using expert decision maps to promote reflection and self-assessment in medical case-based instruction. In: Proceedings of Workshop on the Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains at ITS, Montréal, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howell, D.: 8th Edition of statistical methods for psychology. Wadsworth, Belmont (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda Jarrell
    • 1
  • Tenzin Doleck
    • 1
  • Eric Poitras
    • 2
  • Susanne Lajoie
    • 1
  • Tara Tressel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational and Counselling PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations