Learning to Diagnose a Virtual Patient: an Investigation of Cognitive Errors in Medical Problem Solving
Although cognitive errors (i.e., premature closure, faulty data gathering, and faulty knowledge) are the main reasons for making diagnostic mistakes, the mechanisms by which they occur are difficult to isolate in clinical settings. Computer-based learning environments (CBLE) offer the opportunity to train medical students to avoid cognitive errors by tracking the onset of these errors. The purpose of this study is to explore cognitive errors in a CBLE called BioWorld. A logistic regression was fitted to learner behaviors that characterize premature closure in order to predict diagnostic performance. An ANOVA was used to assess if participants who were highly confident in their wrong diagnosis engaged in more faulty data gathering via confirmation bias. Findings suggest that diagnostic mistakes can be predicted from faulty knowledge and faulty data gathering and indicate poor metacognitive awareness. This study supports the notion that to improve diagnostic performance medical education programs should promote metacognitive skills.
KeywordsCognitive errors Metacognition Computer-based learning environment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Elstein, A.S., Schwartz, A.: Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions, pp. 49–59. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn (1995)Google Scholar
- 6.Lajoie, S.: Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship mode. In: Development of professional expertise, Cambridge, UK, pp. 61–83 (2009)Google Scholar
- 8.Azevedo, R., Feyzi-Behnagh, R.: Dysregulated learning with advanced learning technologies. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lajoie, S.P., Poitras, E.G., Doleck, T., Jarrell, A.: Modeling metacognitive activities in medical problem-solving with BioWorld. In: Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends, pp. 323–343. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
- 11.Lajoie, S., Naismith, L., Poitras, E., Hong, Y., Panesso-Cruz, I., Ranelluci, J., Wiseman, J.: Technology rich tools to support self-regulated learning and performance in medicine. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, Amsterdam (2013)Google Scholar
- 12.Naismith, L.: Examining motivational and emotional influences on medical students’ attention to feedback in a technology-rich environment for learning clinical reasoning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Canada (2013)Google Scholar
- 13.Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K.E. et al.: Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan (2000)Google Scholar
- 15.Gauthier, G., Lajoie, P.S., Naismith, L., Wiseman, J.: Using expert decision maps to promote reflection and self-assessment in medical case-based instruction. In: Proceedings of Workshop on the Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains at ITS, Montréal, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
- 16.Howell, D.: 8th Edition of statistical methods for psychology. Wadsworth, Belmont (2013)Google Scholar