Important New Terms and Classifications in Uncertainty and Fuzzy Logic

Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 326)


Human cognitive and perception processes have a great tolerance for imprecision or uncertainty. For this reason, the notions of perception and cognition have great importance in solving many decision making problems in engineering, medicine, science, and social science as there are innumerable uncertainties in real-world phenomena. These uncertainties can be broadly classified as either type one uncertainty arising from the random behavior of physical processes or type two uncertainty arising from human perception and cognition processes. Statistical theory can be used to model the former, but lacks the sophistication to process the latter. The theory of fuzzy logic has proven to be very effective in processing type two uncertainty. New computing methods based on fuzzy logic can lead to greater adaptability, tractability, robustness, a lower cost solution, and better rapport with reality in the development of intelligent systems. Fuzzy logic is needed to properly pose and answer queries about quantitatively defining imprecise linguistic terms like middle class, poor, low inflation, medium inflation, and high inflation. Imprecise terms like these in natural languages should be considered to have qualitative definitions, quantitative definitions, crisp quantitative definitions, fuzzy quantitative definitions, type-one fuzzy quantitative definitions, and interval type-two fuzzy quantitative definitions. There can be crisp queries, crisp answers, type-one fuzzy queries, type-one fuzzy answers, interval type-two fuzzy queries, and interval type-two fuzzy answers.


  1. 1.
    Gupta, M.M.: Cognition, Perception and Uncertainty. In: Gupta, M.M., Yamakawa, T. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge-Based Systems, Decision and Control, pp. 3–6. North-Holland, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, M.M.: On Cognitive Computing: Perspectives. In: Gupta, M.M., Yamakawa, T. (eds.) Fuzzy Computing: Theory, Hardware, and Applications, pp. 7–10. North-Holland, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, M.M.: Uncertainty and Information: The Emerging Paradigms. Int. J. Neuro Mass Parallel Comput. Inf. Syst. 2, 65–70 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta, M.M.: Intelligence, Uncertainty and Information. In: Ayyub, B.M., Gupta, M.M., Kanal, L.N. (eds.) Analysis and Management of Uncertainty: Theory and Applications, pp. 3–12. North-Holland, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ayyub, M.,Gupta, M.M. (eds.): Uncertainty Analysis in Engineering and Sciences: Fuzzy Logic, Statistics and Neural Networks Approach. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klir, G.J.: Where Do We Stand on Measures of Uncertainty, Ambiguity, Fuzziness and the Like. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 24(2), 141–160 (1987). Special Issue on Measure of UncertaintyCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klir, G.J.: The Many Faces of Uncertainty. In: Ayyub, B.M., Gupta, M.M. (eds.) Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis: Theory and Applications, pp. 3–19. North-Holland, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solo, A.M.G. Gupta,M.M.: Perspectives on Computational Perception and Cognition under Uncertainty. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) 2000, Taleigaon, Goa, India, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 221–224, 19-22 Jan 2000Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solo, A.M.G., Gupta, M.M.: Uncertainty in Computational Perception and Cognition. In: Nikravesh, M., Kacprzyk, J., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) Forging New Frontiers: Fuzzy Pioneers I: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 251–266. Springer Verlag, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta, M.M., Solo, A.M.G.: On the Morphology of Uncertainty in Human Perception and Cognition. In: Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary CHESS Interactions Conference pp. 257–271. World Scientific, Hackensack, N.J. (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Einstein, A.: Geometry and Experience. In: The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Papers on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Dover, New York (1952)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zadeh, L.A.: A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J. Cybern. 2, 4–34 (1972)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex system and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3, 28–44 (1973)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Calculus of fuzzy restrictions. In: Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S., Shimura, M. (eds.) Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, pp. 1–39. Academic, New York (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part I: Information Science, vol. 8, 199–249, Part II: Information Science, vol. 8, 301–357, Part III: Information Science, vol. 9, 43–80Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets and information granularity. In: Gupta, M.M., Ragade, R., Yager, R. (eds.) Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications, pp. 3–18. North-Holland, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zadeh, L.A.: A theory of approximate reasoning. In: Hayes, J., Michie, D., Mikulich, L.I. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 9, pp. 149–194. Halstead, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a computational approach to meaning and knowledge representation based on the concept of a generalized assignment statement. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Artificial Intelligence and Man-Machine Systems, pp. 198–211 (1986)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. Commun. ACM 37(3), 77–84 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs: a précis. Multiple Valued Logic 1, Gordon and Breach Science, pp. 1–38 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 90, 111–127 (1997)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a Computational Theory of Perceptions Based on Computing with Words. In: Sinha, N.K., Gupta, M.M. (eds.) Soft Computing & Intelligent Systems: Theory and Applications, pp. 3–22. Academic, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gupta, M.M., Jin, L., Homma, N.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: An Overview, in Static and Dynamic Neural Networks: From Fundamentals to Advanced Theory, pp. 636–644. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gupta, M.M., Saridis, G.N., Gaines, B.R. (eds.): Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes. Elsevier North-Holland, New York (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E. (eds.): Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis. North-Holland, New York (1982)MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E. (eds.): Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes. North-Holland, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta, M.M., Kandel, A., Bandler, W., Kiszka, J.B. (eds.): Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems. North-Holland, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mitra, S., Gupta, M.M., Kraske, W. (eds.): Neural and Fuzzy Systems: The Emerging Science of Intelligent Computing. International Society for Optical Computing (SPIE) (1994)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, H., Gupta, M.M. (eds.): Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sinha, N.K., Gupta, M.M. (eds.): Soft Computing & Intelligent Systems: Theory and Applications, pp. 3–22. Academic, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Solo, A M.G.: Fuzzy Grading: Fuzzy Logic for Uncertainty Management of Linguistic Evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE’10) pp. 271–276 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Singh, H., Gupta, M.M., Meitzler, T., Hou, Z.-G., Garg, K.K., Solo, A.M.G. (eds.): Real-Life Applications of Fuzzy Logic. Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Hindawi, New York (2013). Accessed 31 Dec 2013
  36. 36.
    Kosko, B.: Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Hyperion, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kosko, B.: Heaven in a Chip: Fuzzy Visions of Society and Science in the Digital Age. Three Rivers, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mendel, J.M., John, R.I.: Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Made Simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10, 117–127 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Liu, F.: Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14, 808–821 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mendel, J.M.: Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems: An Overview. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2, 20–29 (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Solo, A.M.G., Gupta, M.M., Homma, N., Hou, Z.-G.: Obama, McCain, and Warren Needed Fuzzy Logic to Define ‘Rich’ by Income. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE’09), Las Vegas, pp. 265–270, 13–16 July 2009Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Solo, A.M.G.: Warren, McCain, and Obama Needed Fuzzy Sets at Presidential Forum. Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Hindawi, New York (2013). Accessed 31 Dec 2013
  43. 43.
    Solo, A.M.G., Gupta, M.M., Homma, N., Hou, Z.-G.: Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy. In: Solo, A.M.G. (ed.) Political Campaigning in the Information Age. IGI Global, Hershey, Penn (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Solo, A.M.G.: Interval Type-Two Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy. In: Solo, A.M.G. (ed.) Political Campaigning in the Information Age. IGI Global, Hershey, Penn (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory, College of EngineeringUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.Maverick Technologies America IncWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations